On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 17:37, Markus Schaaf via arch-general
wrote:
> What I have found: It is unlikely that hibernation is the cause to the
> problem I have encountered. It is just the trigger. Somehow dm-integrity
> or dm-crypt manages to fuck up it's on-disk meta-data. (Meanwhile the
> same happ
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 12:03, Justin Capella via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Ah interesting. Do those memory regions match what is reported in
> proc/iomem prior to hibernating-- odd question but I recall someone on the
> irc encountering a difference.
Mmm that *is* inter
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020, 10:08 Justin Capella via arch-general, <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dm-crypt/Swap_encryption#With_suspend-to-disk_support
Nope; if that was the problem then the kernel would not see the resume data
at all, because the swap blo
I'm having trouble getting hibernation to work on my new Dell Inspiron
7590. It seems that the image is stored correctly (onto LUKS+LVM thin-lv),
but resume fails, with the following left in the kernel logs:
---
PM: Image signature found, resuming
PM: resume from hibernation
Freezing user space pr
On 10 March 2014 16:14:07 GMT, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
>On Monday 10 Mar 2014 15:40:13 John WH Smith wrote:
>> By the way, I
>> strongly believe you will fix things faster if you like
>your environment
>> (I assume it is Arch here, of course). Being used to your
>system is much
>> more importa
If there's a developer anywhere that agrees with you, and I expect there will
be at some point, udev will be forked, or something else will be developed to
rival systemd. Right now, that's not even necessary.
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/14/2012 10
Sometimes the most loving thing to do is let someone go through a short, sharp
pain in order to avoid a long, drawn out one. Systemd is not evil. You may not
like the idea of changing, but it probably will be the best thing for you to do
to avoid more pain down the line. No rush, but I reckon t
That sounds like a perfectly fair attitude to have. Although the change may
require a little thought, I really think SystemD will not suddenly make Arch
difficult to use, though. Is that what you're worried about?
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue,
Are you talking about the willingness of the Linux community in general to go
through tough technical transitions for the sake of progress? If so, I'd say
that's one of the big things that makes Linux so successful, and Windows so
slow to improve. There are always the distros with LTS releases
Yes, but it strives to hide those sorts of transitions from the user. I believe
the issue in question is the pain of change.
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
Jelle van der Waa wrote:
On 08/14/12 15:51, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 Aug 2012 14:59:43 Ralf Mardorf wro
10 matches
Mail list logo
