On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:30 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:57:05 +0100
>> Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>>
>>> p.s. I wasn't being sarcastic about the JS package, polkit now has
>>> javascript based config files!
>>
>>
> You don't need sudo or su to sign a package with your own key, just
> import your own (public) key into the pacman keyring as normal and
> trust it.
I know
The makepkg -i uses sudo or su if missing
You'll need root to import the key once.
Sudo can enforce signed packages are required.
--
__
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:57:05 +0100
> Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
>> p.s. I wasn't being sarcastic about the JS package, polkit now has
>> javascript based config files!
>
> WTF...
>
> I want some of that stuff they smoke at Red Hat :)
... i'
> > > > Don't you need to sign it too? I would
> > >
> > > ?
> >
> > Signing a package you build for yourself, knowing that it's a dummy,
> > without a source and even if there should be a source, why signing this
> > package. Is this an UEFI thingy?
> >
> > Sarcasm lost in translation ;).
> >
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:57:05 +0100
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> p.s. I wasn't being sarcastic about the JS package, polkit now has
> javascript based config files!
WTF...
I want some of that stuff they smoke at Red Hat :)
---
Joakim
> On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 15:02 +0200, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:52:22 +0100
> > Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > > Don't you need to sign it too? I would
> >
> > ?
>
> Signing a package you build for yourself, knowing that it's a dummy,
> without a source and even if there shou
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 12:52 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > I send the PKGBUILD and the package with a second mail. For good reasons
> > only the PKGBUILD came through the list. I could send the package
> > off-line, but it's more secure to build it yourself using the PKGBUILD.
> > Inside of the d
> I send the PKGBUILD and the package with a second mail. For good reasons
> only the PKGBUILD came through the list. I could send the package
> off-line, but it's more secure to build it yourself using the PKGBUILD.
> Inside of the directory where the PKGBUILD is run
> makepkg
> then as root run
>
8 matches
Mail list logo