Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: systemd pulseaudio

2012-08-29 Thread Jan Steffens
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:30 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Joakim Hernberg wrote: >> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:57:05 +0100 >> Kevin Chadwick wrote: >> >>> p.s. I wasn't being sarcastic about the JS package, polkit now has >>> javascript based config files! >> >>

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: systemd pulseaudio

2012-08-29 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> You don't need sudo or su to sign a package with your own key, just > import your own (public) key into the pacman keyring as normal and > trust it. I know The makepkg -i uses sudo or su if missing You'll need root to import the key once. Sudo can enforce signed packages are required. -- __

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: systemd pulseaudio

2012-08-29 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Joakim Hernberg wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:57:05 +0100 > Kevin Chadwick wrote: > >> p.s. I wasn't being sarcastic about the JS package, polkit now has >> javascript based config files! > > WTF... > > I want some of that stuff they smoke at Red Hat :) ... i'

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: systemd pulseaudio

2012-08-29 Thread John K Pate
> > > > Don't you need to sign it too? I would > > > > > > ? > > > > Signing a package you build for yourself, knowing that it's a dummy, > > without a source and even if there should be a source, why signing this > > package. Is this an UEFI thingy? > > > > Sarcasm lost in translation ;). > >

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: systemd pulseaudio

2012-08-29 Thread Joakim Hernberg
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:57:05 +0100 Kevin Chadwick wrote: > p.s. I wasn't being sarcastic about the JS package, polkit now has > javascript based config files! WTF... I want some of that stuff they smoke at Red Hat :) --- Joakim

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: systemd pulseaudio

2012-08-29 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 15:02 +0200, Joakim Hernberg wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:52:22 +0100 > > Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > > Don't you need to sign it too? I would > > > > ? > > Signing a package you build for yourself, knowing that it's a dummy, > without a source and even if there shou

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: systemd pulseaudio

2012-08-29 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 12:52 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > I send the PKGBUILD and the package with a second mail. For good reasons > > only the PKGBUILD came through the list. I could send the package > > off-line, but it's more secure to build it yourself using the PKGBUILD. > > Inside of the d

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: systemd pulseaudio

2012-08-29 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> I send the PKGBUILD and the package with a second mail. For good reasons > only the PKGBUILD came through the list. I could send the package > off-line, but it's more secure to build it yourself using the PKGBUILD. > Inside of the directory where the PKGBUILD is run > makepkg > then as root run >