- Original message -
> But heiko makes a point. If an unsupported package still worked, without
> compiling or something like that, why would you drop it? The idea with a
> new "unsupported" repo is not bad. You have got the binaries, but you
> are also saying: "this program will probably n
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:27, Harlequin wrote:
> The idea with a new "unsupported" repo is not bad.
> You have got the binaries, but you are also saying: "this program will
> probably not work. We take no responsibility"
Then step up and do something. Make this repository. It would make no
diffe
But heiko makes a point. If an unsupported package still worked, without
compiling or something like that, why would you drop it? The idea with a new
"unsupported" repo is not bad. You have got the binaries, but you are also
saying: "this program will probably not work. We take no responsibility
Am Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:41:01 -0600
schrieb Dan McGee :
> Five step plan to success:
> 1) Actually contribute instead of whining on a mailing list
Is saying one's opinion whining? How long since? And, yes, I am already
contributing in AUR, I've already written a split PKGBUILD for
libreoffice-i18n
Am Thu, 18 Nov 2010 02:01:11 +0800
schrieb Ng Oon-Ee :
> And Gan Lu, I'm not sure which thread you've been following, but Heiko
> specifically references something along the lines of "I may as well go
> back to Gentoo".
Have you really read only this half sentence? Or have you read all my
argumen
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:47 +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 November 2010 16:37:41 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
> > If some says "this is shame", "I'm leaving",
> > "you suck", "developers are selfish", you could certainly discard
> > them, but not I or Heiko, we just talk about our opinion.
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 16:37:41 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
> If some says "this is shame", "I'm leaving",
> "you suck", "developers are selfish", you could certainly discard
> them, but not I or Heiko, we just talk about our opinion.
> Does a great community contain only TU/devs? Does Arch is drive
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:31 AM, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>>> I know I'm crossposting this, but this rather belongs to arch-general
>>> than to aur-general.
>>>
>>> Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:19:40 -0
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:31 AM, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> I know I'm crossposting this, but this rather belongs to arch-general
>> than to aur-general.
>>
>> Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:19:40 -0500
>> schrieb Kaiting Chen :
>>
>>> I think it's kind of
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> I know I'm crossposting this, but this rather belongs to arch-general
> than to aur-general.
>
> Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:19:40 -0500
> schrieb Kaiting Chen :
>
>> I think it's kind of hard for me to see why I should maintain a
>> package that's
I know I'm crossposting this, but this rather belongs to arch-general
than to aur-general.
Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:19:40 -0500
schrieb Kaiting Chen :
> I think it's kind of hard for me to see why I should maintain a
> package that's already been discarded by its developer. In my opinion
> such pac
At Sonntag, 14. November 2010 22:07 Eric Bélanger wrote:
> There's already RSS feeds with that information (maybe not as compact
> as you want) :
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/rss.php
> http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/?op=rss&isdir=1
> http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/community/?op=rss&isd
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Attila wrote:
> At Samstag, 13. November 2010 17:32 Heiko Baums wrote:
>
>> And I have nothing against cleaning up a repo. But this should be done
>> more considered. Means only unimportant, unpopular packages or packages
>> which don't run anymore should be moved
At Samstag, 13. November 2010 17:32 Heiko Baums wrote:
> And I have nothing against cleaning up a repo. But this should be done
> more considered. Means only unimportant, unpopular packages or packages
> which don't run anymore should be moved to AUR or removed completely but
> not packages which
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 17:32 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
>
> And I have nothing against cleaning up a repo. But this should be done
> more considered. Means only unimportant, unpopular packages or packages
> which don't run anymore should be moved to AUR or removed completely but
> not packages which
Am Sat, 13 Nov 2010 10:18:02 -0500
schrieb Loui Chang :
> Sorry, Heiko. I don't think you properly understand Arch culture here.
> If you want something done you are expected to contribute and put
> forth your own effort to make it happen. The TUs and Devs cannot be
> expected to be your personal
Am Sat, 13 Nov 2010 10:05:46 -0500
schrieb Leonid Isaev :
> eboard:The latest version is: 1.1.1 (Feb 22nd, 2008)
> gdesklets: gDesklets 0.36.1 released November 5th 2008
> lincity: The current stable release of lincity is version 1.12.1
>(Aug. 13, 2004)
> tin: TIN 1.9.5 (un
Am Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:34:20 +0100
schrieb Andrea Scarpino :
> I'd like to see your application as TU.
There are reasons, why I currently can't. If I could I would do it. I
hope this will change in the near future, but it can take a while.
Heiko
On Sat 13 Nov 2010 15:23 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:46:30 +0100
> schrieb Andrea Scarpino :
>
> > On Thursday 11 November 2010 22:54:36 Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> > > I adopted some (and edited the page).
> > Nice, today we have 291 orphans packages in [extra] (they were 352
>
On (11/13/10 15:23), Heiko Baums wrote:
-~> Those packages are also quite common and important:
-~>
-~> > eboard
-~> > gdesklets
-~> > lincity
-~> > pure-ftpd
-~> > tcsh
-~> > tin
Let's see...
eboard:The latest version is: 1.1.1 (Feb 22nd, 2008)
gdesklets: gDesklets 0.36.1 released November
On Saturday 13 November 2010 15:23:45 Heiko Baums wrote:
> Nice, then I would need to install 110 packages from AUR and compile
> them manually. When I switched to Arch Linux about 3 years ago it was
> less than 50.
Is a tiny that you do not use any of ours ~8000 packages in official
repositories.
On 14/11/10 00:23, Heiko Baums wrote:
I wouldn't say anything if you would cleanup the official repos from
unnecessary, unimportant and unused or hardly used packages like some
ttf fonts, GTK1 themes, etc. But there are too many, too important
packages in your list which definitely belong into t
Am Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:46:30 +0100
schrieb Andrea Scarpino :
> On Thursday 11 November 2010 22:54:36 Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> > I adopted some (and edited the page).
> Nice, today we have 291 orphans packages in [extra] (they were 352
> three days ago). 62 will be moved to [community]. 127 to AUR.
23 matches
Mail list logo
