On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 06/19/2011 05:56 PM, Pico Geyer wrote:
>
>> [ 20.668] (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
>
> isn't that obvious ?
Indeed, it is.
Sorry for the noise!
>
>> [ 21.555] (II) LoadModule: "nouveau"
>> [ 21.599] (WW) Warning, c
On 06/19/2011 05:56 PM, Pico Geyer wrote:
[20.668] (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
isn't that obvious ?
[21.555] (II) LoadModule: "nouveau"
[21.599] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nouveau
[21.599] (II) UnloadModule: "nouveau"
[21.599] (II) Unloading nouve
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 08:46 PM, Pico Geyer wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As the title of this email suggests I'm having trouble with the new
>> Nvidia driver.
>> I've attached my Xorg log, as I'm sure that there are a log of people
>> who understand the ou
Am 19.06.2011 04:07, schrieb Armando M. Baratti:
Em 18-06-2011 05:03, Richard Schütz escreveu:
I don't think so. Epiphany is based on WebKit these days. And because I
can trigger the bug in EOG (Eye of GNOME) it doesn't look like a browser
problem for me at all.
Perhaps it is a problem of GTK
Em 18-06-2011 05:03, Richard Schütz escreveu:
I don't think so. Epiphany is based on WebKit these days. And because I
can trigger the bug in EOG (Eye of GNOME) it doesn't look like a browser
problem for me at all.
Perhaps it is a problem of GTK together with nvidia 275.09.07. I tried
feh (a sim
Loads fine here with Opera. By the way, nice picture ;)
Nvidia 9600M GT
kernel26-ck-core2 1:2.6.39.1-3
nvidia-ck-core2 275.09.07-1
KDE 4.6.3
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:56:06 -0400, Yaro Kasear wrote:
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 04:57:07 AM Richard Schütz wrote:
Am 18.06.2011 11:29, schrieb Martt
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 04:57:07 AM Richard Schütz wrote:
> Am 18.06.2011 11:29, schrieb Martti Kühne:
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Richard Schütz
wrote:
> >> Am 18.06.2011 09:08, schrieb Dan Vratil:
> >> I don't think so. Epiphany is based on WebKit these days. And because I
> >> can
Am 18.06.2011 11:29, schrieb Martti Kühne:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Richard Schütz wrote:
Am 18.06.2011 09:08, schrieb Dan Vratil:
I don't think so. Epiphany is based on WebKit these days. And because I can
trigger the bug in EOG (Eye of GNOME) it doesn't look like a browser problem
fo
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Richard Schütz wrote:
> Am 18.06.2011 09:08, schrieb Dan Vratil:
> I don't think so. Epiphany is based on WebKit these days. And because I can
> trigger the bug in EOG (Eye of GNOME) it doesn't look like a browser problem
> for me at all.
>
> Perhaps it is a probl
Image loads fine here with nvidia 7600GT. I tried
firefox-pgo4.0.1(without xulrunner), firefox-beta-bin-5b7(with
xulrunner), chromium, konqueror, eog, gpicview, gwenview.
Using KDE atm with:
nvidia 275.09.07-1
kernel26 2.6.39.1-1
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Richard Schütz wrote:
> Am 18.0
Am 18.06.2011 09:08, schrieb Dan Vratil:
On Friday, June 17, 2011 23:10:01 Richard Schütz wrote:
The new driver really seems to have a major problem. I figured out that
you just need an image with 2047px width to screw up the driver.
ATTENTION: This can crash your X server and corrupt memory!
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Mike Sampson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Richard Schütz wrote:
>> The new driver really seems to have a major problem. I figured out that you
>> just need an image with 2047px width to screw up the driver.
>>
>>
>> ATTENTION: This can crash your X se
On Friday, June 17, 2011 23:10:01 Richard Schütz wrote:
> The new driver really seems to have a major problem. I figured out that
> you just need an image with 2047px width to screw up the driver.
>
>
> ATTENTION: This can crash your X server and corrupt memory!
>
> Example: [1], an otherwise harml
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Richard Schütz wrote:
> The new driver really seems to have a major problem. I figured out that you
> just need an image with 2047px width to screw up the driver.
>
>
> ATTENTION: This can crash your X server and corrupt memory!
>
> Example: [1], an otherwise harml
On 17 June 2011 23:10, Richard Schütz wrote:
> The new driver really seems to have a major problem. I figured out that you
> just need an image with 2047px width to screw up the driver.
>
>
> ATTENTION: This can crash your X server and corrupt memory!
>
> Example: [1], an otherwise harmless pictur
*before* nvidia update I had very strange artifacts and freezes with
lxterminal. now it's all right with all kernels and applications.
I have nvidia 9800GT. After update nvidia driver KDE's desktop effects are
chrash and disable :(
works fine here with thinkpad - NVIDIA GPU Quadro FX 880M - latest
linux and nvidia on kde.
tested on rekonq and chromium.
On Friday, June 17, 2011 05:35:06 PM Martti Kühne wrote:
>
>
> >>> Are we sure ths is a bug with the nVidia driver? Can someone load that
> >>> image
> >>> who isn't using it?
>
> confirming display screwage with firefox on an onboard nvidia chip. nasty.
> 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVid
>>> Are we sure ths is a bug with the nVidia driver? Can someone load that
>>> image
>>> who isn't using it?
confirming display screwage with firefox on an onboard nvidia chip. nasty.
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation C77 [GeForce
8200] (rev a2)
cheers!
Yaro Kasear [2011.06.17 1709 -0500]:
> On Friday, June 17, 2011 04:10:01 PM Richard Schütz wrote:
> > The new driver really seems to have a major problem. I figured out that
> > you just need an image with 2047px width to screw up the driver.
> >
> >
> > ATTENTION: This can crash your X server an
Am 18.06.2011 00:20, schrieb John K Pate:
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 17:09 -0500, Yaro Kasear wrote:
On Friday, June 17, 2011 04:10:01 PM Richard Schütz wrote:
The new driver really seems to have a major problem. I figured out that
you just need an image with 2047px width to screw up the driver.
A
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Friday, June 17, 2011 04:10:01 PM Richard Schütz wrote:
>> ATTENTION: This can crash your X server and corrupt memory!
>
> Are we sure ths is a bug with the nVidia driver? Can someone load that image
> who isn't using it?
>
I braved the da
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 17:09 -0500, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Friday, June 17, 2011 04:10:01 PM Richard Schütz wrote:
> > The new driver really seems to have a major problem. I figured out that
> > you just need an image with 2047px width to screw up the driver.
> >
> >
> > ATTENTION: This can crash
275.09.07 here, no problems loading big images.
I do use a custom kernel with with a recompiled nvidia drivers, but I
doubt that would have anything to do with it.
2011/6/17 Yaro Kasear :
> On Friday, June 17, 2011 04:10:01 PM Richard Schütz wrote:
>> The new driver really seems to have a major pr
On Friday, June 17, 2011 04:10:01 PM Richard Schütz wrote:
> The new driver really seems to have a major problem. I figured out that
> you just need an image with 2047px width to screw up the driver.
>
>
> ATTENTION: This can crash your X server and corrupt memory!
>
> Example: [1], an otherwise
The new driver really seems to have a major problem. I figured out that
you just need an image with 2047px width to screw up the driver.
ATTENTION: This can crash your X server and corrupt memory!
Example: [1], an otherwise harmless picture. Every picture with the same
width will work, too. I
On Friday, June 17, 2011 12:55:01 PM Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 08:46 PM, Pico Geyer wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As the title of this email suggests I'm having trouble with the new
> > Nvidia driver.
> > I've attached my Xorg log, as I'm sure that there are a log of people
> > who understand
On 06/17/2011 08:46 PM, Pico Geyer wrote:
Hi all,
As the title of this email suggests I'm having trouble with the new
Nvidia driver.
I've attached my Xorg log, as I'm sure that there are a log of people
who understand the ouput better than I do.
attachments doesn't work on this list
I've ha
Hi all,
As the title of this email suggests I'm having trouble with the new
Nvidia driver.
I've attached my Xorg log, as I'm sure that there are a log of people
who understand the ouput better than I do.
I've had to revert to the previous driver (270.41.19-3) to get my
system up and running again
30 matches
Mail list logo
