As far as I've understand the main problem, it's about mirror which are not
up-to-date.
So could it be possible to make a dummy package of the day ?
Every morning, the main server will produce a dummy package containing the
today's timestamp. So if the dummy package is 3 days old, this means that
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 14:33 -0700, Brendan Long wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 12:07 +0100, Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
> > On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
> > > On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> So should it be a fu
On 12/13/2009 10:33 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 12:07 +0100, Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
So should it be a function of the program to make sure that
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 12:07 +0100, Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
> On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
> > On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So should it be a function of the program to make sure that happens?
> >>> Or is a
> >>
On 13/12/09 12:02, Xavier wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:02:16 +
schrieb Nathan Wayde:
Of-course this also raises the question of 'what happens when the
master goes down?'.
Or gets hacked?
The changes you talked about don't really m
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:02:16 +
> schrieb Nathan Wayde :
>
>> Of-course this also raises the question of 'what happens when the
>> master goes down?'.
>
> Or gets hacked?
>
The changes you talked about don't really make that problem any wo
Am Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:02:16 +
schrieb Nathan Wayde :
> Of-course this also raises the question of 'what happens when the
> master goes down?'.
Or gets hacked?
Greetings,
Heiko
On 12/13/2009 12:08 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
So should it be a function of the program to make sure that happens?
Or is a
responsibility of
Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
So should it be a function of the program to make sure that happens?
Or is a
responsibility of the user? Should the functionality be progra
On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
So should it be a function of the program to make sure that happens?
Or is a
responsibility of the user? Should the functionality be programmed into
pacman to make su
On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
So should it be a function of the program to make sure that happens? Or is a
responsibility of the user? Should the functionality be programmed into
pacman to make sure that happens, or should we be asking that
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Brendan Long wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 11:16 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 17:08 -0700, Brendan Long wrote:
> > > > 2009/12/11 Ng Oon-Ee
> > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 02:13
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Brendan Long wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 11:16 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 17:08 -0700, Brendan Long wrote:
> > > 2009/12/11 Ng Oon-Ee
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 02:13 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > > > > Am Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:58
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 11:16 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 17:08 -0700, Brendan Long wrote:
> > 2009/12/11 Ng Oon-Ee
> >
> > > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 02:13 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > > > Am Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:58:17 +0800
> > > > schrieb Ng Oon-Ee :
> > > >
> > > > > Because so
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 17:08 -0700, Brendan Long wrote:
> 2009/12/11 Ng Oon-Ee
>
> > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 02:13 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > > Am Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:58:17 +0800
> > > schrieb Ng Oon-Ee :
> > >
> > > > Because sometimes all the mirrors listed in mirrorlist will not have
> > > > t
2009/12/11 Ng Oon-Ee
> On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 02:13 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Am Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:58:17 +0800
> > schrieb Ng Oon-Ee :
> >
> > > Because sometimes all the mirrors listed in mirrorlist will not have
> > > the file, if its just been uploaded. Also not everyone stays
> > > up-to
2009/12/11 Ng Oon-Ee :
> On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 02:13 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> Am Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:58:17 +0800
>> schrieb Ng Oon-Ee :
>>
>> > Because sometimes all the mirrors listed in mirrorlist will not have
>> > the file, if its just been uploaded. Also not everyone stays
>> > up-to-the-m
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 02:13 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:58:17 +0800
> schrieb Ng Oon-Ee :
>
> > Because sometimes all the mirrors listed in mirrorlist will not have
> > the file, if its just been uploaded. Also not everyone stays
> > up-to-the-minute with updates, judging by
Am Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:58:17 +0800
schrieb Ng Oon-Ee :
> Because sometimes all the mirrors listed in mirrorlist will not have
> the file, if its just been uploaded. Also not everyone stays
> up-to-the-minute with updates, judging by the "updated after a month"
> posts we see once in a while.
>
>
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:35 +0100, Xavier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > While I'm not as concerned about security as some (most) here, I do
> > think "db files from one site and packages from another" is a good idea.
> > (some) Mirrors will be slow, however, and t
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> While I'm not as concerned about security as some (most) here, I do
> think "db files from one site and packages from another" is a good idea.
> (some) Mirrors will be slow, however, and there will be additional
> complexity since the db would p
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:54 +0200, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote:
> Aaron Griffin (2009-12-11 15:38):
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
> > > For a little while I've been confused because pacman -Syu always said
> > > that everything was up to date (for a week or more). I talked
Aaron Griffin (2009-12-11 15:38):
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
> > For a little while I've been confused because pacman -Syu always said
> > that everything was up to date (for a week or more). I talked to a
> > friend at school and he had the same thing happening and I r
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
> For a little while I've been confused because pacman -Syu always said
> that everything was up to date (for a week or more). I talked to a
> friend at school and he had the same thing happening and I realized
> something might be wrong and com
For a little while I've been confused because pacman -Syu always said
that everything was up to date (for a week or more). I talked to a
friend at school and he had the same thing happening and I realized
something might be wrong and commented out mirrors one at a time until I
found one with update
25 matches
Mail list logo
