Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-11 Thread SanskritFritz
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Brandon Watkins wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:24 AM, fredbezies wrote: > >> 2012/8/11 Andreas Radke : >> > I've updated the PKGBUILD.36 files for libreoffice and libreoffice-i18n >> > in svn trunk. >> > >> > Every user should now be able to build the new vers

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-11 Thread Brandon Watkins
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:24 AM, fredbezies wrote: > 2012/8/11 Andreas Radke : > > I've updated the PKGBUILD.36 files for libreoffice and libreoffice-i18n > > in svn trunk. > > > > Every user should now be able to build the new version. > > > > -Andy > > Thanks. I've tweaked them yesterday, and s

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-11 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Brandon Watkins wrote: > I'm afraid its going to happen unless you know of a way to make gmail stop > top-posting :p You can e.g. scroll down to the end of the message you're replying to ...

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-11 Thread Brandon Watkins
I'm afraid its going to happen unless you know of a way to make gmail stop top-posting :p On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Brandon Watkins wrote: > > Yeah, it does work. I had a read a few posts earlier saying that > spellcheck > > was "b

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-11 Thread fredbezies
2012/8/11 Andreas Radke : > I've updated the PKGBUILD.36 files for libreoffice and libreoffice-i18n > in svn trunk. > > Every user should now be able to build the new version. > > -Andy Thanks. I've tweaked them yesterday, and so far so good. It seems LibO 3.6 is faster on start than 3.5.x. -- F

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-11 Thread Andreas Radke
I've updated the PKGBUILD.36 files for libreoffice and libreoffice-i18n in svn trunk. Every user should now be able to build the new version. -Andy signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-11 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Brandon Watkins wrote: > Yeah, it does work. I had a read a few posts earlier saying that spellcheck > was "broken" in libreoffice 3.6, but it turns out it was all hyperbole, > they were just referring to this bug which is certainly not totally broken > spellcheck:

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-10 Thread Brandon Watkins
Yeah, it does work. I had a read a few posts earlier saying that spellcheck was "broken" in libreoffice 3.6, but it turns out it was all hyperbole, they were just referring to this bug which is certainly not totally broken spellcheck: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53006 On Fri, Aug

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-10 Thread fredbezies
2012/8/10 fredbezies : > 2012/8/10 Brandon Watkins : >> Spellcheck is currently broken in 3.6.0 afiak, so probably best to wait >> until the point release. > > Well, if you don't wipe previous configuration, it could be broken. > And as there is PKGBUILD.36 files, will try by myself. Good to learn

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-10 Thread fredbezies
2012/8/10 Brandon Watkins : > Spellcheck is currently broken in 3.6.0 afiak, so probably best to wait > until the point release. Well, if you don't wipe previous configuration, it could be broken. And as there is PKGBUILD.36 files, will try by myself. Good to learn some more things on build proces

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-10 Thread Brandon Watkins
Spellcheck is currently broken in 3.6.0 afiak, so probably best to wait until the point release. On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:54:14 +0200 > schrieb Jelle van der Waa : > > > On 10/08/12 21:15, fredbezies wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > I know, arc

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-10 Thread fredbezies
Ok. Thanks for the info. Will try ti build it for fun. Have a good weekend Le 10 août 2012 22:15, "Andreas Radke" a écrit : > Am Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:54:14 +0200 > schrieb Jelle van der Waa : > > > On 10/08/12 21:15, fredbezies wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > I know, archlinux is really quick to

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-10 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:54:14 +0200 schrieb Jelle van der Waa : > On 10/08/12 21:15, fredbezies wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I know, archlinux is really quick to package software, so I was > > wondering when LibreOffice 3.6 will be proposed, at least on > > testing ? > > 3.6.0 won't go into our rep

Re: [arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-10 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 10/08/12 21:15, fredbezies wrote: > Hello. > > I know, archlinux is really quick to package software, so I was > wondering when LibreOffice 3.6 will be proposed, at least on testing ? > > I grabbed PKGBUILD from abs, and tweaked .36 version to build both > translations (done first) and then co

[arch-general] When will LibreOffice 3.6 proposed ?

2012-08-10 Thread fredbezies
Hello. I know, archlinux is really quick to package software, so I was wondering when LibreOffice 3.6 will be proposed, at least on testing ? I grabbed PKGBUILD from abs, and tweaked .36 version to build both translations (done first) and then core package (currently working on LibO Writer after