Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Allan McRae
On 30/07/10 12:28, Caleb Cushing wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote: I'd rather wait and let the devs sort out any/all problems with the new version of perl, or any software for that matter, before releasing it, rather than rushing to releasing it in order to "win

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 22:28 -0400, Caleb Cushing wrote: > The only thing left to do is rebuild community -dbd's and move > everything to stable (so far as I can tell), if there's more no one > has mentioned it. Rebuilding, as far as I have observed, does take pretty long for more common packages,

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote: > I'd rather wait and let the devs sort out any/all problems with the new > version of perl, or any software for that matter, before releasing it, > rather than rushing to releasing it in order to "win" a nonexistent race. > On Thu, Jul

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Allan McRae
On 30/07/10 11:23, mike rosset wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Allan McRae wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote: Just so you know I volunteered to be a junior dev and was rejected. I have ~400 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=xenoterracide

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread mike rosset
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Caleb Cushing >  wrote: >> >> Just so you know I volunteered to be a junior dev and was >> rejected. I have ~400 >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=xenoterracide >> packages on the AUR. I f

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 29 Jul 2010 10:05 -0400, Caleb Cushing wrote: > of perl > http://jquelin.blogspot.com/2010/07/perls-state-in-mandriva-cooker.html > how embarrassing. Congrats to them! How's that embarrassing?

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Allan McRae
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote: Just so you know I volunteered to be a junior dev and was rejected. I have ~400 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=xenoterracide packages on the AUR. I file out of date packages on on Arch every day. I think I filed ALL the

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Ray Rashif
On 29/07/2010, Caleb Cushing wrote: > of perl > http://jquelin.blogspot.com/2010/07/perls-state-in-mandriva-cooker.html > how embarrassing. I can see your dissatisfaction, and I empathise, but you don't have to be so vocal about it. There are at least a couple of avenues for you to ensure that us

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Angel Velásquez
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote: > Just so you know I volunteered to be a junior dev and was > rejected. I have ~400 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=xenoterracide > packages on the AUR. I file out of date packages on on Arch every day. > I think I file

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Caleb Cushing
2010/7/29 Angel Velásquez : > Do you know that there is some human intervention in the process to > make these packages? those humans who are in the process called devs, > trusted users, etc .. If you want the last version of _perl_ (or any > other package) and it's not on the repos yet, you can co

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Angel Velásquez
Dear Caleb, Do you know that there is some human intervention in the process to make these packages? those humans who are in the process called devs, trusted users, etc .. If you want the last version of _perl_ (or any other package) and it's not on the repos yet, you can compile yourself, share i

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote: > I'd rather wait and let the devs sort out any/all problems with the new > version of perl, or any software for that matter, before releasing it, > rather than rushing to releasing it in order to "win" a nonexistent race. > Normally I'd

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 07/29/2010 09:36 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote: how embarrassing. I guess cooker is like their testing version... but according to this it's in opensuse 11.3... we're definitely starting to fall behind release distro's here. Since when did

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 07/29/2010 05:05 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote: of perl http://jquelin.blogspot.com/2010/07/perls-state-in-mandriva-cooker.html how embarrassing. perl freak -- Ionuț

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
Mandriva Cooker is like debian sid that's the unstable branch from which they freeze to stable ones. On 29 July 2010 16:36, Caleb Cushing wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Caleb Cushing > wrote: > > how embarrassing. > > I guess cooker is like their testing version... but according to

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote: > how embarrassing. I guess cooker is like their testing version... but according to this it's in opensuse 11.3... we're definitely starting to fall behind release distro's here. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com

[arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Caleb Cushing
of perl http://jquelin.blogspot.com/2010/07/perls-state-in-mandriva-cooker.html how embarrassing. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com