On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:58:34 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
So you wanted to add a comment totally unrelated to the bug itself to
the bug? Isn't that polluting the bug report? What happened here is
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:58:34 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
So you wanted to add a comment totally unrelated to the bug itself to
the bug? Isn't that polluting the bug report? What happened here is
On 03/14/10 13:05, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Heiko Baumsli...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:58:34 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
So you wanted to add a comment totally unrelated to the bug itself to
the bug? Isn't that
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:58:12 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
This sounds like throwing technology at a problem that basically boils
down to a communication issue.
Without specific examples, this
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
I didn't know it, thanks for the info! So I guess every argument
from now on is just for the sake of completion...
More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
commenting
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:34:01 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
Commenting on closed bugs isn't necessary. This is a matter of taste.
Some bug trackers allow this, some not.
More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
But just closing a bug should not be done. There's usually a reason why
a bug is reported even if it's invalid.
Seriously, present some examples here, this talking in the abstract is
stupid. We're all grown ups, no one
On Fri 12 Mar 2010 09:34 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
developers - give reasons why the bug shouldn't be closed.
On Fri 12 Mar 2010 13:28 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
But just closing a bug should not be done. There's usually a reason why
a bug is reported even if it's invalid.
Seriously, present some examples here, this talking in
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri 12 Mar 2010 13:28 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
But just closing a bug should not be done. There's usually a reason why
a bug is reported even if
On Fri 12 Mar 2010 14:11 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri 12 Mar 2010 13:28 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
But just closing a bug should not be done.
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
Actually it is doable, it's a configuration option per project.
Check http://bugs.archlinux.org/pm/proj1/prefs
More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Damjan Georgievski gdam...@gmail.com wrote:
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
Actually it is doable, it's a configuration option per project.
Check http://bugs.archlinux.org/pm/proj1/prefs
More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Damjan Georgievski gdam...@gmail.com wrote:
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
Actually it is doable, it's a configuration option per project.
Check http://bugs.archlinux.org/pm/proj1/prefs
More-over, I
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Damjan Georgievski gdam...@gmail.com wrote:
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
Actually it is doable, it's a configuration option per project.
Check http://bugs.archlinux.org/pm/proj1/prefs
Well damn, looks like I was looking too high up.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Damjan Georgievski gdam...@gmail.com wrote:
More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
developers
assuming malicious users up-front?
Not at all. It is statistics. For a long
On 03/12/10 10:34, Aaron Griffin wrote:
More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
developers - give reasons why the bug shouldn't be closed. That's what
a reopen request is for. If that fails, then it's time to
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Isaac Dupree
m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org wrote:
On 03/12/10 10:34, Aaron Griffin wrote:
More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
developers - give reasons why the bug
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:38:36 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
Not at all. It is statistics. For a long time before the bug
wranglers, I personally had to deal with 75% of the Project Manager
requests from flyspray. These were all reopen requests, and many of
them arguing
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:58:34 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
So you wanted to add a comment totally unrelated to the bug itself to
the bug? Isn't that polluting the bug report? What happened here is
exactly what I'd expect - you contacted the developer.
No, this is
My primary complaint against flyspray is that it doesn't allow comments to
be added after the bug is closed. The only way is by doing a request to
reopen the bug, and even in that case your comment is not added to the
comment list.
Wouldn't this functionality remedy the closing bugs early
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
My primary complaint against flyspray is that it doesn't allow comments to
be added after the bug is closed. The only way is by doing a request to
reopen the bug, and even in that case your comment is not added to the
Am Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:59:07 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
Commenting on bugs after they are closed will just annoy the
developer. If you have an issue with the fix or something, reopening
is the right action. If you have information to add, then add it to
the wiki, as
Am Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:19:46 +0200 (GTB Standard Time)
schrieb Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net:
My primary complaint against flyspray is that it doesn't allow
comments to be added after the bug is closed. The only way is by
doing a request to reopen the bug, and even in that case your
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 14:59 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
My primary complaint against flyspray is that it doesn't allow comments to
be added after the bug is closed. The only way is by doing a request to
reopen the
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 16:57, Hussam Al-Tayeb ht990...@gmail.com wrote:
You should consider moving to bugzilla.
-1. I've used bugzilla, and the interface is absolutely horrible.
Flyspray is much much better.
On 12/03/10 07:57, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 14:59 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Dimitrios Apostolouji...@gmx.net wrote:
My primary complaint against flyspray is that it doesn't allow comments to
be added after the bug is closed. The only way
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 22:49 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:59:07 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
Commenting on bugs after they are closed will just annoy the
developer. If you have an issue with the fix or something, reopening
is the right action.
2010/3/11 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 22:49 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:59:07 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
Commenting on bugs after they are closed will just annoy the
developer. If you have an issue with the fix or
Am Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:58:12 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
This sounds like throwing technology at a problem that basically boils
down to a communication issue.
Without specific examples, this isn't going to go anywhere, really.
Would someone mind linking to the
30 matches
Mail list logo
