On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 06:29, Arch Website Notification
wrote:
>
> * Note: this is an automated message
>
> @gmail.com wants to notify you that the following package may be out
> of date:
>
> Package Name: snes9x
> Architecture: i686
> Repository: Extra
> (http://www.archlinux.org/p
Hello archers,
I just want to let you know that the french hosting service OVH now
provide Arch among many others distro.
Reference :
http://www.ovh.com/fr/items/distributions/archlinux.xml?sort=gnu
Here is a (attempt at) translation :
« Arch Linux distribution, lightweight and fast, which pur
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:51, ianux wrote:
> They provide ArchLinux 2009.08 in both 32 and 64 bit with
> their own kernel with grsecurity (2.6.31.5-grs)
How well does this integrate? Arch doesn't have any
officially-endorsed grsecurity kernel. Does it require userspace
modifications? Have they su
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:00 -0500, "Daenyth Blank"
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:51, ianux wrote:
> > They provide ArchLinux 2009.08 in both 32 and 64 bit with
> > their own kernel with grsecurity (2.6.31.5-grs)
> How well does this integrate? Arch doesn't have any
> officially-endorsed grsec
Am 13.01.2010 14:31, schrieb James Rayner:
>>> They provide ArchLinux 2009.08 in both 32 and 64 bit with
>>> their own kernel with grsecurity (2.6.31.5-grs)
>> How well does this integrate? Arch doesn't have any
>> officially-endorsed grsecurity kernel. Does it require userspace
>> modifications? H
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Alexander Duscheleit
wrote:
> I didn't know, where to put a proper reply in this thread, because
> basically you are all doing the same mistake. I will just outline the
> procedure here briefly and then explain where it all went wrong :)
>
> 1 - cfdisk # the setti
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 07.01.2010 18:26, schrieb David C. Rankin:
> > the create the filesystem. With ext4 now available, is there any
> > reason I shouldn't go ahead and create the filesystem as ext4? It
> Delayed allocation might lead to data loss of recently created or
> overwritten files i
On 12-01-10 19:32, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Guus Snijders wrote:
On 12-01-10 06:27, Loui Chang wrote:
[top posting& trimming ]
I think part of the problem is that some email clients like gmail
webmail help persist the bad behaviour. They default with top postin
On 01/13/2010 02:19 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 January 2010 01:55:40 Patrick Brisbin wrote:
>> I've mine set to yes as well but I still don't get my own posts. Oh well,
>> mutt to the rescue again:
>>
>> # cc myself when replying to an ML
>> # note: with this, you can't :
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:38:45 +0100
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 13.01.2010 14:31, schrieb James Rayner:
> >>> They provide ArchLinux 2009.08 in both 32 and 64 bit with
> >>> their own kernel with grsecurity (2.6.31.5-grs)
> >> How well does this integrate? Arch doesn't have any
> >> officially-endo
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:49:40 -0500
Baho Utot wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > All your tries with the "new methos" thus just failed, because you
> > copied /etc/mdadm.conf too late, and it was never added to the
> > initrd file. Mdadm inside the ramfs just never knew what to look
> > for.
> >
>
> Only if
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:05:04 -0500
Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Alexander Duscheleit
> wrote:
> > I didn't know, where to put a proper reply in this thread, because
> > basically you are all doing the same mistake. I will just outline
> > the procedure here briefly a
Am Mittwoch 13 Januar 2010 schrieb Alexander Duscheleit:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:05:04 -0500
>
> Carlos Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Alexander Duscheleit
> >
> > wrote:
> > > I didn't know, where to put a proper reply in this thread, because
> > > basically you are all d
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Alexander Duscheleit
wrote:
> I still think /arch/setup *should* generate this file itself if it
> detects software raids in use for the target. The wiki even seems to
> suggest, that it does.
>
> Could some releng shine light on this, please?
I completely agree.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Alexander Duscheleit
> wrote:
>> I still think /arch/setup *should* generate this file itself if it
>> detects software raids in use for the target. The wiki even seems to
>> suggest, that it does.
>>
>> Co
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Xavier wrote:
> Where is the link to the bug report ?
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17827
Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:49:40 -0500
Baho Utot wrote:
[putolin]
Notice no initrd in the above
I'm not entirely sure, *how* the system manages to find raid-members
and assembles them in this cases.
A while ago there was a kernel-level raid auto detection which
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:22:30 -0500
Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Alexander Duscheleit
> wrote:
> > I still think /arch/setup *should* generate this file itself if it
> > detects software raids in use for the target. The wiki even seems to
> > suggest, that it does.
>
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:58:34 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:22:30 -0500
> Carlos Williams wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Alexander Duscheleit
> > wrote:
> > > I still think /arch/setup *should* generate this file itself if it
> > > detects software raids
On Wednesday 13 January 2010 21:57:04 Christos Nouskas wrote:
> Kind of late response, but I strongly agree with Thomas. I've had my
> share of truncated files after unclean shutdowns (every single time), some
> kernel modules being among the victims. If you decide to decide to use
> ext4, then it
The new configuration file shows:
# Linux kernel-mode plugin for pppd. If you want to try the kernel-mode
# plugin, use LINUX_PLUGIN=/usr/lib/rp-pppoe/
rp-pppoe.so/etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so
the old path hasn't been removed from comment line.
21 matches
Mail list logo
