> The issue I'm worried about is that of trailing zeroes. Is 2.1_1 < 2.1.1_0?
Seems so:
===
$ mkdir TEMP; cd TEMP
$ cat << EOL > PKGBUILD
pkgname=dummy
pkgver=2.1.1_0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="dummy package"
arch=(any)
url="http://";
license=('GPL')
source=()
md5sums=()
packag
On 30 April 2015 at 07:55, Fabien Dubosson wrote:
>> So, instead of dealing with a pair of `(pgkver, pkgrel)` we now have a
>> triple of `(pkgver,xrev,pkgrel)`. The issue then becomes how to
>> convert this triple into a pair. In particular, how to do it so the
>> version ordering rules that `pa
> So, instead of dealing with a pair of `(pgkver, pkgrel)` we now have a
> triple of `(pkgver,xrev,pkgrel)`. The issue then becomes how to
> convert this triple into a pair. In particular, how to do it so the
> version ordering rules that `pacman` uses results in the wanted
> behaviour.
The `pkg
On 30 April 2015 at 01:10, Xyne wrote:
> On 2015-04-29 22:11 +0200
> Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>>I've slowly been working away on some way to deal with the addition of
>>x-revisions in Cabal files. My plan at the moment is to include it in
>>the `pkgrel` in this way
>>
>> haskell-zlib-0.5.4.2-76-
On 30 April 2015 at 01:01, Xyne wrote:
> On 2015-04-17 18:07 +0200
> Dawid Loubser wrote:
>
>>Magnus, you're a rock star!
>
> A little late to the party but +1 on this. Magnus, your work is great! Thank
> you!
Thank you, thank you very much! ;)
/M
--
Magnus Therning OpenP
On 2015-04-29 22:11 +0200
Magnus Therning wrote:
>I've slowly been working away on some way to deal with the addition of
>x-revisions in Cabal files. My plan at the moment is to include it in
>the `pkgrel` in this way
>
> haskell-zlib-0.5.4.2-76-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
>
>becomes
>
> haskell-zlib-0.5
On 2015-04-17 18:07 +0200
Dawid Loubser wrote:
>Magnus, you're a rock star!
A little late to the party but +1 on this. Magnus, your work is great! Thank
you!
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman
I've slowly been working away on some way to deal with the addition of
x-revisions in Cabal files. My plan at the moment is to include it in
the `pkgrel` in this way
haskell-zlib-0.5.4.2-76-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
becomes
haskell-zlib-0.5.4.2-0.76-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
given that the x-revision is 0
On 29 April 2015 at 12:01, SP wrote:
> On 27/04/15 12:02, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> What reasons would that be?
>
> Maybe some file damage by accident. Also accidentally or under
> misconception that this would fix something. It is an operation
> supported by pacman, so the package should, _ideall
On 27/04/15 12:02, Magnus Therning wrote:
> What reasons would that be?
Maybe some file damage by accident. Also accidentally or under
misconception that this would fix something. It is an operation
supported by pacman, so the package should, _ideally_, cater for it.
> Yes, I understand that, but
10 matches
Mail list logo
