On 27/04/15 12:02, Magnus Therning wrote:
> What reasons would that be?
Maybe some file damage by accident. Also accidentally or under
misconception that this would fix something. It is an operation
supported by pacman, so the package should, _ideally_, cater for it.
> Yes, I understand that, but *why* did it go missing. Somewhere during
> the installation of haskell packages your ghc package database was
> changed (corrupted?) in such a way that ghc lost records of `base`.
> I'd really like to know why.
That I don't know and it would be impossible to work back, as I have
reinstalled it. Sorry..
Maybe it will happen again.
--
SP
_______________________________________________
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
