[arch-projects] [DEVTOOLS][PATCH] arch-nspawn: Force PATH to be the Arch default

ch "$CARCH"} systemd-nspawn -q \ -D "$working_dir" \ + -E "PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin" \ --register=no --keep-unit \ "${mount_args[@]}" \ "$@" -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer

[arch-projects] [DEVTOOLS][PATCH 1/3] archbuild: build without updating the chroot

+4,7 @@ m4_include(lib/valid-tags.sh) _archbuild_args=( '-c[Recreate the chroot before building]' + '-u[Do not update the chroot before before building]' '-r[Create chroots in this directory]:base_dir:_files -/' ) -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer

[arch-projects] [DEVTOOLS][PATCH 2/3] archbuild: install packages in one call to pacman

rm "$copydir$dst" + done } prepare_chroot() { @@ -384,6 +387,9 @@ $update_first && arch-nspawn "$copydir" \ [[ -n ${install_pkgs[*]} ]] && install_packages +# If there is no PKGBUILD we are done +[[ -f PKGBUILD ]] || exit 0 + download_sources prepare_chroot -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer

[arch-projects] [DEVTOOLS][PATCH 3/3] Add sudo config

686-build, /usr/bin/kde-unstable-x86_64-build, \ + /usr/bin/gnome-unstable-i686-build, /usr/bin/gnome-unstable-x86_64-build + +Defaults!DEVTOOLS umask_override + +%devtools ALL=(root) NOPASSWD: DEVTOOLS -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH 2/4] vconsole: use the systemd tool

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > -# Set console font if required > -set_consolefont > +status "Configuring Virtual Console" /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-vconsole-setup Simple quoting is better. Maybe adding a "s" to "Console"? -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH 3/4] random-seed: use the systemd tool

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen > --- >  rc.shutdown |   13 + >  rc.sysinit  |    5 + >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/rc.shutdown b/rc.shutdown > index ec30d56..fc520a6 100755 > --- a/rc.sh

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH 4/4] tmpfiles: let systemd-tools ship most tmpfiles.d entries

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > We only have one that is initsrcipts specific. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen > --- >  tmpfiles.conf |   16 >  1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tmpfiles.conf b/tmpfiles.conf > index a63ca07..8f99a99 100644

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH 1/4] tmpfiles, sysctl, binfmt: use the systemd tools

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > diff --git a/functions b/functions > index 7516345..0d488a7 100644 > --- a/functions > +++ b/functions > @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ umount_all() { > >  remove_leftover() { >        stat_busy "Removing Leftover Files" > -               /usr/lib/init

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 1/2] Remove comment line in rc.conf to be consistent

c.conf >> index 51a8393..030ffb2 100644 >> --- a/rc.conf >> +++ b/rc.conf >> @@ -36,5 +36,4 @@ NETWORK_PERSIST="no" >> >>  # DAEMONS >>  # --- >> -# >>  DAEMONS=(syslog-ng network crond) >> -- >> Sebastien "Seblu&q

Re: [arch-projects] netcfg moving forward

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Jouke Witteveen wrote: > Today netcfg 2.8.0 was made available in testing. This release comes > with improved systemd support. > Can we push 2.7.3 to the stable repositories? > > Since much has changed, a news item might be in place. Current version of netcfg in c

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 4/4] Remove NEED_ROOT crap

give a summary in > the commit message of the pros and cons, and why this is the right > thing to do? https://github.com/seblu/arch-initscripts/commit/9f75591c8a56ba7ec1ea20cfe16dd10a83c65503 Better? -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 2/4] arch-sysctl: allow passing specific config files

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Sébastien Luttringer > wrote: >> Modify our path collection loop to accept the remaining argv as paths to >> config files. This overrides the default lookup for config files in >> /etc, /lib, and /run so t

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 3/4] Support additional binary formats at boot

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Sébastien Luttringer > wrote: >> This patch mount kernel binfmt_misc filesystem at boot and allow loading of >> a default configuration inspired from systemd binfmt.d way. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sébastien Lu

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 4/4] fhs: disallow installing in /srv

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Seblu wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Seblu wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:46

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 4/4] fhs: disallow installing in /srv

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Seblu wrote: >> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Seblu wrote: >> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:56 PM,

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 4/4] fhs: disallow installing in /srv

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Seblu wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> /srv is admin territory, similar to /home. No package should >>> put stuff there. >> Are you sure

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 4/4] fhs: disallow installing in /srv

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > If all packages should install into /usr/share instead of /srv, how > about a TODO? > I can create it if there is consensus that it's a good idea. This should be great ! I see this old wiki page: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Web_

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 4/4] fhs: disallow installing in /srv

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > /srv is admin territory, similar to /home. No package should > put stuff there. Are you sure of this? Currently many "http" packages use /srv/http to put static files. e.g backuppc, flyspray, roundcube... http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH] arch-sysctl: suppress errors about unknown keys

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:23 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:44 PM, lolilolicon wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:09 PM, lolilolicon wrote: According to sysctl(8), the -e option is used to "ignore er

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 6/7] locale: fix locale.sh for zsh

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Uglier script, but should now work with zsh as well as bash. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen > --- >  locale.sh |   77 +--- >  1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > dif

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 1/7] config: add /etc/hostname support

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 28/10/11 09:35, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Allan McRae  wrote: >>> >>> On 27/10/11 10:28, Dan McGee wrote: Does anyone else still hold onto the old days where configuration was primarily a sing

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] new release

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Seblu wrote: >> I'm writing a patch to fix this : https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25269. >> I hope it will be done monday or tuesday. > > Cool. I believe there was a patch for this

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] new release

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Hi guys, > > I intend to make a new initscripts release in the next week. Please > let me know if I have missed some patches, or if you notice any > problems with the current git. > > Changes: > > * We'll start complaining about an empty /usr

Re: [arch-projects] [MKINITCPIO][PATCH 2/2] Add a virtio hook

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Seblu wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:39:44PM +0200, Sebastien Luttringer wrote: >>>> This allow initcpio to boot

Re: [arch-projects] [MKINITCPIO][PATCH 2/2] Add a virtio hook

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:39:44PM +0200, Sebastien Luttringer wrote: >> This allow initcpio to boot vm which use virtio as network/disk backend. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sebastien Luttringer >> --- >>  install/virtio |   15 +++ >>  1

Re: [arch-projects] [MKINITCPIO][PATCH 1/2] Fix save build directory with presets

;) >> +        (( SAVELIST )) && preset_mkopts+=(-s) >>          (( QUIET )) || preset_mkopts+=(-v) >>          # Build all images >>          . "$PRESET" >> @@ -237,7 +238,8 @@ if [[ $PRESET ]]; then >>              msg2 "${preset_cmd[*]}"

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH] Load sysctl config files from sysctl.d

p &>/dev/null > +# Load sysctl config files > +[[ -x /usr/lib/initscripts/arch-tmpfiles ]] && > /usr/lib/initscripts/arch-tmpfiles falure! > >  # Start daemons >  for daemon in "${DAEMONS[@]}"; do > diff --git a/tmpfiles.conf b/tmpfiles.conf > index 7dd1358..93fe532 100644 > --- a/tmpfiles.conf > +++ b/tmpfiles.conf > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > >  D /tmp              1777 root root >  D /run/daemons      0755 root root > +d /run/sysctl.d     0755 root root > >  d /tmp/.X11-unix    1777 root root >  d /tmp/.ICE-unix    1777 root root > -- > Sebastien "Seblu" Luttringer > > -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH] Load sysctl config files from sysctl.d

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> NOTE: maybe this feature should be added as a daemon for procps package >> allowing user to reload configs files by calling rc.d reload procps > > What's the "off" version of this setting: > > vm.swappiness=0 > > I have no idea how you inten

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH] initscripts: load of sysctl files at startup

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Seblu wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:44:17PM +0200

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH] initscripts: load of sysctl files at startup

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:44:17PM +0200, Earendil wrote: >>> I have also added the capability to stip th sysctl.conf files in many >>> files in the sysctl.d directory. >>> This idea

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH] rc.d: handle a set of options

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:32:32PM +0200, Sebastien Luttringer wrote: >> rc.d can now take --started, --stopped, --auto, --noauto as option which >> help user to populate list of daemon for all actions >> >> As a corollary list command can

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 4/4] rc.d: list [started|stopped|auto|noauto|daemon]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 01:04:23PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Lukas Fleischer >> wrote: >> > `rc.d list [--started|--stopped|--auto|--noauto] [...]`, of >> > course. Skipping the optional list of daemon

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH] rc.d: list [started|stopped|auto|noauto|daemon]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > If you want to be consistent, we use '[[ -z' everywhere else. '[[ !' > isn't wrong, its just unexpected in our codebase. ok > > Generally we use array+=("$another"). There's nothing wrong with this > persay, just don't reverse it -- bash is

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH] rc.d: list [started|stopped|auto|noauto|daemon]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > Hm, wouldn't that mean we would never be able to explicitly list daemons > called "started", "stopped", "auto" and "noauto"? I know that this is > nit-picking, but I would prefer another argument "daemons" or "all", > followed by a list

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 4/4] rc.d: list [started|stopped|auto|noauto|daemon]

d ]] && continue >> -                               printf >> "${C_OTHER}[${C_FAIL}STOPPED${C_OTHER}]" >> -                       fi >> -                       # print auto / manual status >> -                       if ! ck_autostart "$d"; then >> -                               printf "${C_OTHER}[${C_DONE}AUTO${C_OTHER}]" >> -                       else >> -                               printf "${C_OTHER}[${C_FAIL}    ${C_OTHER}]" >> -                       fi >> -                       printf " ${C_CLEAR}$d\n" >> -               done >> +               list "$@" >>        ;; >>        *) >>                # check min args count >> diff --git a/zsh-completion b/zsh-completion >> index e5c2850..b324e5c 100644 >> --- a/zsh-completion >> +++ b/zsh-completion >> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ _rc.d () { >>                                        _arguments "*: :" >>                                        ;; >>                                list) >> -                                       _arguments "2: :(started stopped)" >> +                                       _arguments "*: :(started stopped >> auto noauto $(echo /etc/rc.d/*(N-*:t)))" >>                                        ;; >>                                start) >>                                        _arguments "*: :($(comm -23 <(echo >> /etc/rc.d/*(N-*:t)|tr ' ' '\n') <(echo /run/daemons/*(N:t)|tr ' ' '\n')))" >> -- >> Sebastien "Seblu" Luttringer >> >> > -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-projects] [mkinitcpio] boot times with different COMPRESSIONs

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > In case it is not clear: the only imortant number is the "kernel" > time. In which gzip/lzop are the clear winners. > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> We have a lot of compression options now for mkin

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] Add manpage for rc.d script

>>> +More uncommon actions are >>> + >>> +*reload*:: >>> +     Signals the daemon to reload its configuration. >> >> It might just be me, but I don't like the usage of the word 'signal' >> here, as it might imply that a signal is sent, which isn't always the >> case. >> >>> + >>> +*status*:: >>> +     Shows the status of the daemon. >> >> This whole section should be pluralized wrt daemons, no? >> >> dave >> >>> + >>> +Examples >>> + >>> +*rc.d stop crond*:: >>> +     Stops the *crond* daemon. >>> + >>> +*rc.d start crond cupsd*:: >>> +     Starts the *crond* and *cupsd* daemon. >> >> daemons. >> >>> + >>> +*rc.d restart crond*:: >>> +     Restarts the *crond* daemon. >>> + >>> +*rc.d list*:: >>> +     List all daemons and their status. >>> + >>> +Files >>> +- >>> +'/etc/rc.d':: >>> +     Directory containing available daemons on the system. >>> + >>> +Authors >>> +--- >>> +*rc.d* is created by the Arch Linux Developer community. >>> -- >>> 1.7.6 > > I'm preparing a patch to incorporate these suggestions (minus the > "list " thing as I saw that was reverted, right?). > > Anyone know how I can get a newline in the synopsis, because I guess > there are two distinct synopsises now: > > rc.d [daemons] > rc.d list [started|stopped] [seblu@rwolf ~]$ rc.d usage: rc.d [daemon] ... rc.d list [started|stopped] rc.d help -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] Add manpage for rc.d script

On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 03:03:18PM +0200, Seblu wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Elvis Stansvik wrote: >> >> As suggested by Tom at [1

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] Add manpage for rc.d script

On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Elvis Stansvik wrote: >> As suggested by Tom at [1], I'm sending this patch here (see >> attachment). Please proof-read and give comments. >> >> Cheers, >> Elvis >> >> [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/ta

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH 2/2] rc.d: Add check to cleanly abort rc.d script if user doesn't have root privileges

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Seblu wrote: >> Dave, Tom, i see your comments in this bug : >> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25271 and this doesn't make be happy. >> >> Here I wanted to make adjustmen

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH 2/2] rc.d: Add check to cleanly abort rc.d script if user doesn't have root privileges

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Seblu wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Seblu wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Eric Bélanger >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Sure, checking for

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH 2/2] rc.d: Add check to cleanly abort rc.d script if user doesn't have root privileges

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Seblu wrote: > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Eric Bélanger > wrote: >> >> Sure, checking for root privileges for all actions is the easiest and >> simplest method.  However, the status actions which currently, in most >> cases, c

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] [PATCH 11/11] functions: Simplify LC_* unsetting

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > --- >  functions |    4 +--- >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/functions b/functions > index 8d303e8..1985170 100644 > --- a/functions > +++ b/functions > @@ -64,9 +64,7 @@ unset TERM_COLORS >  unset TZ > >  

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] [PATCH 13/18] Simplify LC_* unsetting

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > --- >  functions |    4 +--- >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/functions b/functions > index 88a7822..d24df8c 100644 > --- a/functions > +++ b/functions > @@ -62,9 +62,7 @@ unset TERM_COLORS >  unset TZ > >

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] [PATCH] Fix: don't use install where target file can't/shouldn't be removed

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > Seblu, 2011-06-27 00:51: >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Kurt J. Bosch >>  wrote: >>> >>> Seblu, 2011-06-27 00:28: >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Kurt J.

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] [PATCH] Fix: don't use install where target file can't/shouldn't be removed

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > Seblu, 2011-06-27 00:28: >> >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Kurt J. Bosch >>  wrote: >>> >>> --- >>>  functions  |    7 +++ >>>  rc.sysinit |    4 ++-- >>>  2 f

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] [PATCH] Fix: don't use install where target file can't/shouldn't be removed

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > --- >  functions  |    7 +++ >  rc.sysinit |    4 ++-- >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/functions b/functions > index 43414c0..9ad75a9 100644 > --- a/functions > +++ b/functions > @@ -428,6 +428,13 @@

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] Patch to fix FS#24879

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Jacob Okamoto wrote: > On June 26, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Seblu wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Seblu wrote: >>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Jacob Okamoto >>> wrote: >>>> Patch to fix FS#24879, clearing

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] [PATCH 2/2] add_daemon: Fix redirection

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > Seblu, 2011-06-26 21:24: >> >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Kurt J. Bosch >>  wrote: >>> >>> --- >>>  functions |    2 +- >>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] Patch to fix FS#24879

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Seblu wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Jacob Okamoto wrote: >> Patch to fix FS#24879, clearing terminal text formatting after nonexistent >> daemon script failure in rc.d. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jacob Okamoto >> --

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] Patch to fix FS#24879

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Jacob Okamoto wrote: > Patch to fix FS#24879, clearing terminal text formatting after nonexistent > daemon script failure in rc.d. > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Okamoto > --- >  rc.d |    3 ++- >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/rc.d

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] [PATCH 2/2] add_daemon: Fix redirection

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > --- >  functions |    2 +- >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/functions b/functions > index 9374827..43414c0 100644 > --- a/functions > +++ b/functions > @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ in_array() { > >  add_daemon() { >

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] [PATCH 11/12] Simplify LC_* unsetting

On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Kurt J. Bosch > wrote: >> Dave Reisner, 2011-06-25 20:00: >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:16:03PM +0200, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: ---  functions |    4 +---  1 files changed, 1 insertions

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] [PATCH] rc.sysinit: Fix Initializing Random Seed

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > Seblu, 2011-06-26 19:18: >> >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Kurt J. Bosch >>  wrote: >>> >>> --- >>>  rc.sysinit |    2 +- >>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] [PATCH] rc.sysinit: Fix Initializing Random Seed

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > --- >  rc.sysinit |    2 +- >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/rc.sysinit b/rc.sysinit > index a6a5fa5..2d0fdc1 100755 > --- a/rc.sysinit > +++ b/rc.sysinit > @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ status "Activating Swap" swap

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][RFC] deprecating ck_depends

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm trying to resolve FS#20903, and I think the only sensible solution is to > stop using the ck_depends function. I'd like to hear your opinion on this. > > This is the situation: > ck_depends was introduced in >

Re: [arch-projects] [MKINITCPIO][PATCH 1/2] Fix printing of bash usage when asking for a bad hook

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:54:08AM +0200, Seblu wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 07:04:26AM +0200, Sebastien Luttringer wrote: >> >> before: >&

Re: [arch-projects] [MKINITCPIO][PATCH 1/2] Fix printing of bash usage when asking for a bad hook

ile getopts ':c:k:s:b:g:a:p:m:vH:LMhS:' arg; do >>             IFS=${OLDIFS} >>             unset OLDIFS >>             ;; >> -        H) . "${INSTDIR}/${OPTARG}"; >> +        H) [[ ! -r "${INSTDIR}/${OPTARG}" ]] && echo "No such

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] [GIT] Arch Linux initscripts repository branch master updated. 2011.06.3-31-g824567c

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > commit fe48fab2c2c35ccbfa3eec436d40739bc4b486da > Author: Dave Reisner > Date:   Sun Jun 19 09:04:24 2011 -0400 > >    rc.sysinit: avoid use of regex match for USE* vars > >    Although silly, this would positively match something such as >

Re: [arch-projects] [mkinitcpio][PATCH] Added usbinput to default hooks (implements FS#19328)

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > Signed-off-by: Eric Bélanger > --- >  mkinitcpio.conf |    2 +- >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mkinitcpio.conf b/mkinitcpio.conf > index 52abd56..64e0c13 100644 > --- a/mkinitcpio.conf > +++ b/mkinitcpi

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH 2/2] rc.d: Add check to cleanly abort rc.d script if user doesn't have root privileges

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > > Sure, checking for root privileges for all actions is the easiest and > simplest method.  However, the status actions which currently, in most > cases, can done as a regular user will require root privileges from > now on if we go this way.

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH 2/2] rc.d: Add check to cleanly abort rc.d script if user doesn't have root privileges

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Eric Bélanger > wrote: >> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Seblu wrote: >>> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Eric Bélanger >>> wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH] [initscripts] network: Add missing broadcast address

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 09.06.2011 06:04, schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi: >> Without this broadcast address is not set. > > The broadcast address is uniquely defined by the network(or IP) and > netmask. The user should not need to explicitly specify this. It's

Re: [arch-projects] rc.d bash_completion

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >>On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:32:36PM +0200, Andrwe wrote: >> So here is a version which should satisfy your hints. >> Why should I always use an array? >> It's easier to manipulate a string using bash internals than >> manipulating an array. >> B

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] new release soon

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Hi Seblu, > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Seblu wrote: >>> Thanks. I had indeed forgotten this. Looks good to me. Seblu, any >>> reason you did not include this with the others? Should I just rebase &g

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH] rc.sysinit: kill off VERBOSE= parameter

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > Upstream already supports this via the loglevel= parameter on the kernel > cmdline, so we should support using this instead of our own homegrown > solution. > Hi Dave, I wondering about which upstream you speak? In don't find any reference of

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] new release soon

refactored because of Dave's patch. Feel free to do >> it. I'm not very confortable with git and I usually messed up when I >> had to do this kind of thing in the past. > > Thanks. I had indeed forgotten this. Looks good to me. Seblu, any > reason you did not include t

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH 2/2] rc.d: Add check to cleanly abort rc.d script if user doesn't have root privileges

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Seblu wrote: >> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Eric Bélanger >> wrote: >>> This implements FS#24095. The check is only made for the start, stop and >>> restart >&g

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH 2/2] rc.d: Add check to cleanly abort rc.d script if user doesn't have root privileges

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > This implements FS#24095. The check is only made for the start, stop and > restart > actions of the daemon scripts. This allows regular user to use the help and > list > functionality of rc.d and also to use rc.d for actions that doesn't r

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH] rc.d: declare ENV as an array

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner > --- > Sorry to sneak this in -- I should have noticed it earlier. This is simply a > continuation of my crusade against eval, which would happily go to town with > word splitting. > > As this conflicts with Eric'

Re: [arch-projects] [netcfg] doing a netcfg release ?

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Rémy Oudompheng wrote: > Hello, > > I see the current netcfg release is more than a year old. It seems > wise to do a new release with the current state of the git repository, > which has accumulated several patches over time. > > If nobody objects, I can write som

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] rc.d zsh completion

2011/5/18 Tom Gundersen : > Hi, > > Clément submitted the attached zsh completion file for review. zsh it's cool ! I will look this. > (Anyone should be able to post to the mailinglist, don't know what the > problem might have been). you need to be member of the list to post. I already mentioned t

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 6/6] Add rc.d bash completion

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Hi Sébastien, > > Is your branch on github ready to be reviewed now? I think you > implemented some suggestions I made, but I don't know if you finished. As you ask me, i sent patch on project to review and let you pull when you think it's go

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 6/6] Add rc.d bash completion

on b/bash-completion > new file mode 100644 > index 000..3b0f464 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/bash-completion > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ > +# rc.d bash completion by Seblu > + > +_rc.d () > +{ > +       local action="help list start stop reload restart" > +  

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH] [initscripts] Use mount -n for devpts and shm

nts against modifying the initscripts to > enforce the symlink and coordinate it with a util-linux rebuild, but I'm > not sure others agree. > I switch some times ago with a /etc/mtab linked to /proc/self/mounts and fuse works well. smbnetfs on /home/seblu/samba type fuse.smbnetfs (rw,no

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][RFC] deprecating TIMEZONE from rc.conf

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: >> Am Mon, 16 May 2011 20:28:17 +0200 >> schrieb Tom Gundersen : > As far as I know Gentoo does the same as Arch, I'm not sure what > Ubuntu does and Fedora/OpenSuse do what I propose. d

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH] [initscripts] Use mount -n for devpts and shm

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi > --- >  rc.sysinit |    4 ++-- >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/rc.sysinit b/rc.sysinit > index 733149c..6a01029 100755 > --- a/rc.sysinit > +++ b/rc.sysinit

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 1/2] Fix coloring on light terms

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Kwpolska wrote: > This patch has one flaw with $C_H2 (patch is available in a mail sent > by me a while ago).  This one does not look very nice with a white > xfce4 terminal and gnome-terminal (with Linux colors).  It's cyan. > For testing, I have a white xfce4 ter

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] /sbin/rc conflicts with plan9 package

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> It's not a file conflict, but a PATH conflict. Calling 'rc' or using a >> '#!/usr/bin/env rc' shebang is likely the culprit. From >> community/plan9port's profile.d script: > > Is there a

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 1/2] Fix coloring on light terms

      C_BKGD="\033[1;35m"         # backgrounded >> >> -       C_H1="\033[1;37;40m"        # highlight text 1 >> -       C_H2="\033[1;36;40m"        # highlight text 2 >> +       C_H1="\033[0;1m"            # highlight text 1 >> +       C_H2="\033[1;36m"           # highlight text 2 >> >> -       C_CLEAR="\033[1;0m" >> +       C_CLEAR="\033[0m" >>  fi >> >>  if [[ -t 1 ]]; then >> -- >> Sebastien "Seblu" Luttringer >> >> > -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 1/2] Fix coloring on light terms

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 04/05/11 09:18, Sebastien Luttringer wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Sebastien Luttringer >> --- > > Just as an FYI, we spent quite a bit of time trying to do this as portably > and safely as possible in makepkg.  Check out how we select > colors

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] background color in /sbin/rc

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> Seblu wrote: >>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis >>> wrote: >>>> Kwpolska wrote: >>>>> >>>>> (a reprint of FS#

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts] background color in /sbin/rc

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Kwpolska wrote: >> >> (a reprint of FS#24074) >>> The initscripts' /etc/rc.d/functions uses colors with a black >>> background. It does not look very nice on a transparent black >>> terminal. A patch is included. >> >> tomegun requested

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH] [RFC][mkinitcpio] Cleanly stop udev >= 168 as recommended by upstream.

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 04:11:08AM +0200, Seblu wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi >> wrote: >> > N0: udev >= 168 is needed. >> > N1: I guess the order is correct (first

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH] [RFC][mkinitcpio] Cleanly stop udev >= 168 as recommended by upstream.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > N0: udev >= 168 is needed. > N1: I guess the order is correct (first cleanup then exit). > N2: device-mapper/LVM udev rules must be parsed for initramfs creation >    to add OPTIONS+="db_persist" > > From udev NEWS: > The running ud

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][netcfg] deprecating advanced network functionality from initscripts

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: I'd vote for #2, keeping old timers (and me) happy. It seems like the right line to draw so that someone using a "normal" de

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH] rc cleaning run rc.d scripts

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Sebastien Luttringer > wrote: >> diff --git a/rc b/rc >> index 1e64119..9889d1e 100755 >> --- a/rc >> +++ b/rc >> @@ -43,8 +43,14 @@ case $1 in >>        *) >>                action=$1 >>                sh

Re: [arch-projects] [initscrupts][RFC] umount tmpfs and ramfs on shutdown

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > uOn Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Seblu wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> >>> If someone knows of any reason not to unmount tmpfs or ramfs on >>> shutdown, please spea

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH] rc: exit with error count, not error sum

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > cc199761f assumes that /etc/rc.d scripts will exit with a value of 0 or > 1. Since this can't be guaranteed, clamp the return value to 0 or 1 > before adding it to the exit value. > --- >  rc |    2 +- >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 d

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 3/3] rc: exit with a meaningful value

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:28:00PM +0200, Seblu wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> > --- >> >  rc |    7 +-- >> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >&

Re: [arch-projects] [initscrupts][RFC] umount tmpfs and ramfs on shutdown

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Hi guys, > > On shutdown we unmount/remount most filesystems. However, we make > exception fro the "api" filesystems as they might still be useful and > they are anyway not backed by a block device. > > The problem is that umount does not eas

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 3/3] rc: exit with a meaningful value

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: > --- >  rc |    7 +-- >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/rc b/rc > index 9abeb52..1e64119 100755 > --- a/rc > +++ b/rc > @@ -11,10 +11,12 @@ e.g: rc list >      rc help >      rc start sshd gpm >  EOF > +  

Re: [arch-projects] [initscripts][PATCH] Use Makefile to replace install.sh

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> If we're going to use a Makefile for minilogd, we might as well use it >> for everything. This has some moving pieces: > > Brilliant! Committed. > Great idea :) -- Sébastien Luttrin

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 3/3] Add an rc helper

}STARTED${C_OTHER}]" >> +                       else >> +                           printf "${C_OTHER}[${C_FAIL}STOPPED${C_OTHER}]" >> +                       fi >> +                       # print auto / manual status >> +                       if ! ck_autostart "$d"; then >> +                           printf "${C_OTHER}[${C_DONE}AUTO${C_OTHER}]" >> +                       else >> +                           printf "${C_OTHER}[${C_FAIL}    ${C_OTHER}]" >> +                       fi >> +                       printf " ${C_MAIN}$d${C_CLEAR}\n" >> +               done >> +               ;; >> +       *) >> +               action=$1 >> +               shift >> +               for i; do >> +                       [[ -x "/etc/rc.d/$i" ]] && "/etc/rc.d/$i" $action >> +               done >> +esac >> + >> +true >> + >> +# vim: set ts=2 sw=2 noet: >> -- >> Sebastien Seblu Luttringer >> >> > -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 04/10] mtab: don't write to mtab if it is a symlink

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Seblu wrote: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Seblu wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>>> In the future /etc/mtab should be a symlink to /proc

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 04/10] mtab: don't write to mtab if it is a symlink

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Seblu wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> In the future /etc/mtab should be a symlink to /proc/self/mounts, add >>> support for this in rc.sy

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 2/2] Disable Soft Raid (mdadm) detection in initscipts.

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 05:39:57PM +0200, Seblu wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 04:55:14PM +0200, Sebastien Luttringer wrote: >> >> This job is don

Re: [arch-projects] [INITSCRIPTS][PATCH 2/2] Disable Soft Raid (mdadm) detection in initscipts.

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 04:55:14PM +0200, Sebastien Luttringer wrote: >> This job is done by recent version of udev in >> /lib/udev/rules.d/64-md-raid.rules. > > this comes from mdadm, not udev. Yes but upstream rules does not match with my cu

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 08/10] depmod: no longer update module dependencies on boot

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Seblu wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> This should not be necessary as the packages installing modules should >> be responsible for updating the dependencies. >> >> Furthermore, as modules can be loa

Re: [arch-projects] [PATCH 09/10] timezone: do not set timezone from rc.conf at boot

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Seblu wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> This is done at shutdown, so no need to repeat it here. >> Why removing it at boot and not at shutdown. I

  1   2   >