[Architecture] Review of ES in existing products

2014-03-24 Thread Sameera Medagammaddegedara
Hello Everyone, The meeting minutes for the ES in existing products discussion are given below (Sorry about the delay) ; *Participants: * - * ES:* Ruchira, SameeraM - * Greg:* Chandana - * APIM/APP:* Rajeeva,Ruwan and Joeseph (Jo) *Purpose:* - This was a follow up meeting from the

Re: [Architecture] ESB Connector for Gmail

2014-03-24 Thread Sewwandi Perera
Yes Indika. But in the initial discussions, we thought of mainly focusing on the e-mail transactions than Gmail settings. As suggested by Samisa, I'll first implement one operation and see whether I can take some more operations to implement. Thanks, Sewwandi On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:30 PM, I

Re: [Architecture] ESB Connector for Gmail

2014-03-24 Thread Indika Kularathne
There are more operations [0] that you can see in gmail rest api. [0] - https://developers.google.com/admin-sdk/email-settings/?csw=1 Thanks BR Indika Kularathne On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Sewwandi Perera wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [Architecture] Integrating ntask component into ESB

2014-03-24 Thread Isuru Udana
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Sagara Gunathunga wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Kasun Indrasiri wrote: > >> I would like to clarify the objective of this task: >> >> - Introduce the concept of a Task provider in to ESB. Which means any >> existing task (task config) can be ra

Re: [Architecture] Integrating ntask component into ESB

2014-03-24 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Kasun Indrasiri wrote: > I would like to clarify the objective of this task: > > - Introduce the concept of a Task provider in to ESB. Which means any > existing task (task config) can be ran on the available task provider( this > can be ntask, quartz or anything

Re: [Architecture] ESB Connector for Gmail

2014-03-24 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > So you are going to support only 7 operations? Is that all we have in this > original Gmail PI? > Menat to say API > > Thanks, > Samisa... > > > Samisa Abeysinghe > > Vice President Developer Evangelism > > WSO2 Inc. > http://wso2.com

Re: [Architecture] Integrating ntask component into ESB

2014-03-24 Thread Kasun Indrasiri
I would like to clarify the objective of this task: - Introduce the concept of a Task provider in to ESB. Which means any existing task (task config) can be ran on the available task provider( this can be ntask, quartz or anything) - However, the recipes concept is completely transparent at Synaps

Re: [Architecture] ESB Connector for Gmail

2014-03-24 Thread Sewwandi Perera
Hi Samisa, As I mentioned above, there is no specific API for Gmail. Therefore, I am going to use the "java-gmail-imap" library given in [1]. The Operations which I have listed out in the above mail can be implemented using the "java-gmail-imap" library. I planned only for 7 operations to fit int

[Architecture] ESB Connector for Gmail

2014-03-24 Thread Sewwandi Perera
*Introduction* For the V1.0 of the connector, I mainly focus on implementing the basic e-mail operations like accessing and sending e-mail messages. *API* Since there is no data API for Gmail [1], I'll be using IMAP, SMTP extensions provided by Google [2] for implementation. *Authentication* OAut

Re: [Architecture] ESB Connector for Gmail

2014-03-24 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Sewwandi Perera wrote: > Hi Samisa, > > As I mentioned above, there is no specific API for Gmail. Therefore, I am > going to use the "java-gmail-imap" library given in [1]. > The Operations which I have listed out in the above mail can be > implemented using the "

Re: [Architecture] ESB Connector for Gmail

2014-03-24 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
So you are going to support only 7 operations? Is that all we have in this original Gmail PI? Thanks, Samisa... Samisa Abeysinghe Vice President Developer Evangelism WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Sewwandi Perera wrote: > *Introduction* > For the V1.0 of the co