Re: [Architecture] Removing tenant ID and using tenant domain throughout

Tenant ID is a core part of the design. It cannot be dropped at this stage without major changes & implications to the platform. On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Shashika Karunatilaka wrote: > HI Chinthana, > > AFAIU let say a scenario where a tenant is deleted and create another with > the same

Re: [Architecture] Removing tenant ID and using tenant domain throughout

HI Chinthana, AFAIU let say a scenario where a tenant is deleted and create another with the same domain. By having a tenant id we can uniquely identify the tenant. Thank you. On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Chintana Wilamuna wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to do $subject? > > Often times whe

[Architecture] Removing tenant ID and using tenant domain throughout

Hi, Is it possible to do $subject? Often times when debugging and trying to trouble shoot problems, we have tenant ID and we need to identify tenant domain from ID. I'm proposing that we removing tenant ID altogether and use tenant domain. So for each tenant, in the file system also when storing

Re: [Architecture] RFC: RESTFul API for API Manager

Hi Jo, again, thanks for your work: we'll get a nice RESTful API :-) In the Richardson maturity model we'll get to level 2 (not level 3 because we are leaving out HATEOS - which is something that is not used often today in practice anyhow). I exported the YAML of the API, put it into a Word doc

Re: [Architecture] [G-Reg] Introducing a new carbon-governance specific table in carbon-governance

Hi Senaka, In previous implementation I did, the checkpoints were not captured as resource properties. They were stored in a table. Now I included them as resource properties as you said. Hence no need of introducing a new table. Thanks for the suggestion. Property search was done using the solar

[Architecture] [APPM] [IS] Change of XACML based authorization

We are planning to change the existing XACML based authorization implementation. In the current implementation the XACML policies are generated by aggregating the following parts. 1) Target -> Resource-Id (Determined by the URL of a resource) 2) Target -> Action-Id (Determined by the HTTP verb of

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Extension for Developer Studio 4.0.0

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Punnadi Gunarathna wrote: > Hi Rajeeva, > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Rajeeva Uthayasangar > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Manisha Gayathri >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Rajeevan Vimalanathan < >>> rajeev..

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Extension for Developer Studio 4.0.0

Hi Rajeeva, On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Rajeeva Uthayasangar wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Manisha Gayathri > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Rajeevan Vimalanathan < >> rajeev...@wso2.com> wrote: >> >>> --Adding Manjula >>> >>> Hi Rajeeva/ Awanthika, >>>

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Extension for Developer Studio 4.0.0

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Manisha Gayathri wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Rajeevan Vimalanathan > wrote: > >> --Adding Manjula >> >> Hi Rajeeva/ Awanthika, >> >> Please find my inline comments. >> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Awanthika Senarath >> wrote: >> >>> Hi R

Re: [Architecture] Operations Center RestAPI

Hi Nirmal, I fully agree about naming APIs according to the REST guidelines :-) Since we are currently in the process of creating a bunch of RESTful APIs, I suggest to make sure that we have a WSO2-wide naming scheme for the resources we support to manipulate via our APIs. Obviously, the followi

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Extension for Developer Studio 4.0.0

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Rajeevan Vimalanathan wrote: > --Adding Manjula > > Hi Rajeeva/ Awanthika, > > Please find my inline comments. > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Awanthika Senarath > wrote: > >> Hi Rajeevan, >> >> My thoughts on this >> >> But, this is different case from crea

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Extension for Developer Studio 4.0.0

@ Rajeevan importing an project actually means bringing the source into workspace, is it really happens with our scenario? yes it does On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Rajeevan Vimalanathan wrote: > --Adding Manjula > > Hi Rajeeva/ Awanthika, > > Please find my inline comments. > > On Fri, Mar

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Extension for Developer Studio 4.0.0

--Adding Manjula Hi Rajeeva/ Awanthika, Please find my inline comments. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Awanthika Senarath wrote: > Hi Rajeevan, > > My thoughts on this > > But, this is different case from creating a new project, or importing an > existing project. Here, both App Factory and

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Extension for Developer Studio 4.0.0

Hi On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Awanthika Senarath wrote: > Hi Rajeevan, > > My thoughts on this > > But, this is different case from creating a new project, or importing an > existing project. Here, both App Factory and DevStudio is going to be cloud > based applications and interacting eac

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Extension for Developer Studio 4.0.0

Hi Rajeevan, My thoughts on this But, this is different case from creating a new project, or importing an existing project. Here, both App Factory and DevStudio is going to be cloud based applications and interacting each other. So, putting this into "New" category won't make any sense, I guess.

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Extension for Developer Studio 4.0.0

Hi Rajeeva, Please find my inline comments. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Rajeeva Uthayasangar wrote: > Hi, > > In writing the plugin for App Factory/App Cloud, we planned to introduce > perspective concept to have the necessary tools for App factory extensions > to be loaded.We thought to

[Architecture] App Factory Extension for Developer Studio 4.0.0

Hi, In writing the plugin for App Factory/App Cloud, we planned to introduce perspective concept to have the necessary tools for App factory extensions to be loaded.We thought to have a *Perspective tab *in Main menu and list App Factory Perspective under that. But there were some discussions, not