Hi Sinthuja,
What we are trying to do here is, persist the events coming from
micro-gateway so that events would not be lost when publishing them to
analytics.
Microgateway should be able to run on its own. If analytics server is not
present at the moment we are invoking APIs in microgateway, ther
Hi all,
We tested following
- Private key jwt authentication
- OIDC login/logout flow
- OIDC Hybrid flow with "code id_token" response type
No blocking issues found. Hence +1 for the release
Thanks
Amalka
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:08 AM Ayesha Dissanayaka wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have tested f
Hi Rukshan,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:40 AM Rukshan Premathunga
wrote:
> Hi Sinthuja,
>
> Per min summary within local node will be fine and reduce the traffic to
> Analyzer. But can we grantee that, Siddhi apps will not slow down other
> functionalities(gateway request)?
>
IMHO it should not s
Hi Fazlan,
Yes, would reduce some events 3 times, but still, I think in the new
approach we need to send at least one event per gateway request to
analytics server. Which means, based on the TPS values (load) of APIM
server, we need to scale up analytics nodes as well. Basically, our
requirement i
Hi All,
I have tested following Identity Management Scenarios.
User Self Registration
Username Recovery
Password Self Recovery
via Email
via Challenge Questions
Admin Forced Password reset
via Email link
via OTP in Email
via Offline OTP
Email Notifications
Resend Account Verification li
Hi all,
I've started working on the server-side implementation of SAML Artifact
Binding. The basic idea is as follows.
When authentication is done via SAML, SAML assertion is sent to the user
agent (browser) as a direct response from the IDP. One disadvantage of this
method is the possibility of
Hi Sinthuja,
There is an ongoing effort to combine request, response and execution time
event streams into a single stream and publish a single event instead of 3
events to the Stream processor. This is targeted for the Q3 release and can
bring down the traffic by 3 times to the analytics server.
Hi Sinthuja,
Per min summary within local node will be fine and reduce the traffic to
Analyzer. But can we grantee that, Siddhi apps will not slow down other
functionalities(gateway request)?
This can be try out in ballerina based gateway since streams is already in
there. But if we take c4 based
Hi All,
I have tested the following,
- Generating MP-JWT 1.0 compatible token.
- Microprofile JWT Sample
No blocking issues found. Hence +1 for the release.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 5:08 PM Biruntha Gnaneswaran
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have tested the following,
>
> Create service provider
Hi All,
I have tested the following,
Create service provider and tested OAuth flow with playground when hashing
access tokens, refresh tokens, client secrets, and authorization codes
feature enabled.
No blocking issues found.
[+] Stable - go ahead and release
Thanks,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 4
Hi,
With my recent work with metrics and other monitoring systems, I'm thinking
whether our model of sending everything and calculate in the analytics
server side is correct.
Basically IMHO, the majority of the product analytics use cases are
statistics calculation. For example, in APIM, we are c
Hi All,
+1 from Platform Security Team.
Thank You,
Nadeeshani.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Ashen Weerathunga wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have tested the following and found no issues.
>
>- Consent Management for Self Sign Up.
>- Creating Users with the Ask Password Option.
>- Passw
Hi All,
I have tested the following and found no issues.
- Consent Management for Self Sign Up.
- Creating Users with the Ask Password Option.
- Password pattern validation.
- SAML SSO with Consent Management.
[+] Stable - go ahead and release
Thanks,
Ashen
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at
Hi Jørgen.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:31 AM Jørgen Østergaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are using an Secure LDAP connection to Active Directory as a user
> store. We need some additional functionality on top of the existing AD
> structure, which requires changes in the existing setup / application.
Hi All,
Tested the IS 5.6.0-RC3 integration with IS-Analytics-5.6.0
And check the session analytics reports.
No blocking issues found.
[+] Stable
Thanks,
Ishara
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:48 PM Isuri Anuradha wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've tested following scenarios on the IS 5.6.0-RC3 pack.
>
Hi All,
Tested user account association scenarios. No blocking issues found.
[+] Stable - Go ahead and release
Thanks,
Thanuja
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:48 PM Isuri Anuradha wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've tested following scenarios on the IS 5.6.0-RC3 pack.
>
>- SAML to SAML federation flow.
>
Hi all,
I've tested following scenarios on the IS 5.6.0-RC3 pack.
- SAML to SAML federation flow.
- Publish and Update XACML policies.
- OAuth token revocation.
No blocking issues found.
[+] Stable
Thanks
Isuri.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Omindu Rathnaweera wrote:
> Hi All,
>
Hi All,
Tested SCIM 2.0 basic operations. No blocking issues found
[+] Stable - Go ahead and release
Regards,
Omindu.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:14 PM Nipuni Bhagya wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've tested following scenarios on the IS 5.6.0-RC3 pack.
>
>- Configuring Single-Sign-On with SAML2
Hi all,
We are working on a feature to prompt for user input during the
authentication flow. This is a part of the conditional authentication
implementation.
Consider the identifier first login flow implementation, where the user
first enter the username first and then Identity Server prompt for
Hi all,
I've tested following scenarios on the IS 5.6.0-RC3 pack.
- Configuring Single-Sign-On with SAML2
- Configuring Single-Sign-On with OIDC
- Configuring Multi-Factor Authentication
- Configuring Twitter as a Federated Authenticator
- Setting up Self-Signup
- Creating a wo
Hi,
Tested SSO with Multi step/multi option authentication, Google and Twitter
authenticators
No blocking issues found.
[+] Stable - Go ahead and release
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:59 PM Hasanthi Purnima Dissanayake <
hasan...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tested below scenarios on IS 5.6.0-RC3 p
Hi all,
I have tested the following,
Create service provider and tested oAuth flow with playground.
multi-authentication with facebook.
Configure TOTP Authenticator.
No blocking issues found.
[+] Stable - Go ahead and release
thanks,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 1:44 PM Sathya Bandara wrote:
> H
Hi,
Tested followed scenarios in super tenant, primary user store.
- Account Locking
- Self Registration with email confirmation.
- Self-care portal operations.
- Password reset through a notification.
- Password reset through challenge questions.
- Account Recovery.
- Passw
Hi,
Tested below scenarios on IS 5.6.0-RC3 pack,
- Register a service provider
- Obtain an access token using JWT grant type
- Invoke user info endpoint using the token.
No blocking issues found.
[+] Stable - Go ahead and release
Thanks,
Hasanthi
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Dewni Weerama
When we do WUM updates to the distribution (Microgateway Toolkit), we may
have to force build the runtime even if there aren't changes to the API and
Policy definitions. In that case we may need a flag to force build.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote:
> +1 for this approa
Hi,
We are closing the vote due to the above issue. We will fix the issue and
release another release candidate as soon as possible.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Thilini Shanika wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Found [1] while testing the distributed deployment of APIM. Hence -1 for
> RC3.
>
>
Hi,
Tested below scenarios on IS 5.6.0-RC3 pack,
- Invoke the OAuth Introspection Endpoint.
- OAuth token revocation.
- Entitlement policy creation using write policy in xml and publishing.
- Using REST APIs via XACML to manage entitlement.
- Create, update, get, delete an OAuth ap
+1 for this approach.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Malintha Amarasinghe
wrote:
> + IsuruH
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Malintha Amarasinghe > wrote:
>
>> List of fields planned to be added as of now; kindly let me know if any
>> field is missing.
>>
>> *API*
>> name
>> context
>> v
Hi All,
Found [1] while testing the distributed deployment of APIM. Hence -1 for
RC3.
[1] https://github.com/wso2/product-apim/issues/3459
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Dinusha Dissanayake
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Tested the following.
>
> Different user creations. ( admin, publisher and s
+ IsuruH
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Malintha Amarasinghe
wrote:
> List of fields planned to be added as of now; kindly let me know if any
> field is missing.
>
> *API*
> name
> context
> version
> apiDefinition
> responseCaching
> isDefaultVersion
> type - (http vs ws)
> transport - (http
Hi all,
I've tested following scenarios on the IS 5.6.0-RC3 pack.
User management (add/update/remove users).
User management in secondary userstores (Read-Write LDAP).
Consent Management in SAML SSO.
SAML to SAML federation.
Creating workflows definitions for primary userstore users.
Engaging/Dis
List of fields planned to be added as of now; kindly let me know if any
field is missing.
*API*
name
context
version
apiDefinition
responseCaching
isDefaultVersion
type - (http vs ws)
transport - (http/https)
endpointConfig
endpointSecurity
corsConfiguration
authorizationHeader
*SubscriptionThro
32 matches
Mail list logo
