Re: [Architecture] [APIM][IS] A new permission to create OAuth app through Dynamic Client Registration module

2016-03-02 Thread Johann Nallathamby
Hi Nuwan, On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote: > Yes, having a dedicated permissions string would be best IMO. Can we > finalize on a permissions string for this? > > @IS Team, what is the plan of applying the Dynamic Client Registration PR > to the release branch? We need to make a

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][IS] A new permission to create OAuth app through Dynamic Client Registration module

2016-03-02 Thread Nuwan Dias
Yes, having a dedicated permissions string would be best IMO. Can we finalize on a permissions string for this? @IS Team, what is the plan of applying the Dynamic Client Registration PR to the release branch? We need to make a decision whether we're going to use this one or the one we have locally

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][IS] A new permission to create OAuth app through Dynamic Client Registration module

2016-03-01 Thread Malintha Amarasinghe
Hi Darshana, Thanks for the quick response. I will go through the link. Thanks, Malintha On Mar 1, 2016 5:09 PM, "Darshana Gunawardana" wrote: > Hi Malintha, > > Yes, the better option is to create new permissions for DCR, rather > reusing already defined permissions. You can refer [1] to see

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][IS] A new permission to create OAuth app through Dynamic Client Registration module

2016-03-01 Thread Darshana Gunawardana
Hi Malintha, Yes, the better option is to create new permissions for DCR, rather reusing already defined permissions. You can refer [1] to see how the recently developed IS workflow component defined its permission model and it's hierarchy. [1] http://cdwijayarathna.blogspot.com/2016/01/permissio