Re: svn commit: r647784 - in /archiva/trunk: archiva-cli/ archiva-modules/archiva-base/archiva-artifact-converter/ archiva-modules/archiva-base/archiva-configuration/ archiva-modules/archiva-base/arch

Okay, reverted now :) Thanks, Deng On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Deng, The latest snapshot I published should not include this in the POM, so I think you can revert that now :) Cheers, Brett On 14/04/2008, at 9:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Board Report for April 2008 review

Hi Everyone, We need to submit the board report this weekend. So far, below is what we have in the report. Could you please review it? Some things might have been missed as well, please feel free to add them :-) Archiva Board Report for April 2008 --- *

Re: Board Report for April 2008 review

Okay, I'll add all of these in the board report. Btw, the report is accessible in the /pmc/archiva private space if there's more any of you would like to add. Thanks! -Deng On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/04/2008, at 12:09 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:

Re: svn commit: r645833 - in /archiva/trunk: archiva-jetty/src/main/conf/jetty.xml archiva-modules/archiva-web/archiva-rss/src/main/java/org/apache/archiva/rss/processor/NewArtifactsRssFeedProcessor.j

entries (e.g. new artifacts discovered after another repo scan) then the rss would only be generated or updated if another user subscribes to the feed :-) - Brett On 09/04/2008, at 12:00 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote: Unfortunately, not all the time.. The generation and update of the feeds

Alpha releases for 1.1

What does everybody think of doing alpha releases for 1.1 so that we could get the things scheduled for that release out in small increments? It would be like what we did with 1.0, except that this would be at a shorter time frame. We could set a date for the final release and if necessary, move

Feature Archiva in ApacheCon

Hi Everyone, In the upcoming ApacheCon US 2008, the ASF will be offering a program where in different ASF projects will be featured (each slot will have a 4hr duration). I would like to submit some materials for Archiva for this program. Below is a draft I made of what we could present for

Re: mailing lists?

Brett already filed an IT jira for that :-) http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1563 -Deng On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Joakim Erdfelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so ... what's needed to move the archiva mailing lists? - Joakim

Re: [ohloh] Update with new svn enlistment

Great :-) Thanks Joakim! -Deng On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Joakim Erdfelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I updated the Apache Archiva project on ohloh.net http://www.ohloh.net/projects/6670 I added a new enlistment for the new subversion repository/trunk root. I left the old one in place

Re: [JIRA] move from jira.codehaus.org to issues.apache.org?

I have no problems moving the MRM jira to Apache, as that would centralize all the resources we're using to Apache. We just need to make sure that users would be well notified of this change, as not everyone who's using Archiva is subscribed to the mailing lists. -Deng On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at

Re: svn commit: r641729 - /maven/archiva/trunk/archiva-web/archiva-standalone/archiva-jetty/pom.xml

I was able to build the jetty bundle. The problem came up when I ran it. I'm getting a jasper compiler exception when I tried to access the application, so I added the dependency back and everything worked fine again :-) Thanks, Deng On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL

Re: Apache Archiva is now a top level project at the ASF

Great news! :-) Thanks everyone and congratulations! -Deng On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, The board approved the resolution we submitted, so Archiva is now a TLP. I look forward to working with you all on moving forward with this! Cheers,

Re: Trunk has a build loop??

I forgot to add earlier.. you could take a look at wrapper.log in the installation dir to see the startup problem. Thanks, Deng On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm expecting we will

Re: Trunk has a build loop??

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 17/03/2008, at 2:05 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, the jetty bundle should be working.. it already worked for me before. I tried it again

[Results] [VOTE] Request Archiva graduation to a TLP

, Deng On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, As discussed in the Archiva dev list, below is the proposal for the Archiva TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. [ ] +1

Re: [Results] [VOTE] Request Archiva graduation to a TLP

Okay, thanks Brett! :-) -Deng On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/03/2008, at 9:20 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Cool! I will pass this on to the board for the meeting later this month. I will also note that I removed Dennis at his request on the Maven

Re: Repository purge documentation

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can only activate one of them (if the # of days old is 0, then purge by # of days old; otherwise, purge by retention count). However

[VOTE] Request Archiva graduation to a TLP

; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Archiva PMC: Fabrice Bellingard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Maria Odea Ching ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Nicolas de Loof ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Joakim Erdfelt ([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [discuss] Archiva TLP proposal

list as: Maria Odea Ching ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Fabrice Bellingard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Nicolas de Loof ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Joakim Erdfelt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Arnaud Heritier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Dennis Lundberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Jesse McConnell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Brett Porter ([EMAIL

Re: [discuss] Archiva TLP proposal

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 28/02/2008, at 5:31 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote: +1 to this list. Is this a list of existing commiters in the project only? Would it be inappropriate to get James Dumay involved in this too? I don't have any

Re: Recent contributions

Hi Dario, I've already applied MRM-687 and MRM-692. I still need to take a further look at the rest. Anyway, could you also provide tests for MRM-687 and MRM-206? :-) Thanks again! -Deng On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Dário Oliveros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, I've recently

Re: Plan to migrate towards Spring?

On Feb 19, 2008 11:23 AM, Joakim Erdfelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We also have a few of these tasks as dependent on the integration of Spring into the code tree. If we phase in the Spring support, and try to use spring and plexus at the same time we can't phase those tasks in because it'll

Re: Archiva 1.1 Roadmap

for 1.2 now? Cheers, Brett [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Archiva+Roadmap On 11/02/2008, at 5:07 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote: On Feb 7, 2008 7:08 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have some additions :) I also think we need to keep reviewing the types

Re: Recent contributions

Thanks for the patches Darios! I'll look into them this weekend :) Thanks, Deng On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:33 AM, James William Dumay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are some good patches here - could we get them integrated any time soon? James On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 08:06 -0800, Dário

Re: Archiva 1.1 Roadmap

Thanks for putting this up James! Your proposal looks great :) I've also listed below some other things I think we should consider or take note of while planning the roadmap: 1. When is our target date for the 1.1 release? So that we could cut down our roadmap and prioritize based on this target

Re: svn commit: r615848 - in /maven/archiva/trunk: ./ archiva-base/archiva-configuration/src/main/mdo/ archiva-base/archiva-proxy/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archiva/proxy/ archiva-base/archiva-pro

The branch for 1.0.x is now ready: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archiva/branches/archiva-1.0.x It is branched from -r615120 so the patch for MRM-667 needs to be applied, as well as Nicolas' commit for MRM-670.. Thanks, Deng On Jan 29, 2008 9:29 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: svn commit: r615848 - in /maven/archiva/trunk: ./ archiva-base/archiva-configuration/src/main/mdo/ archiva-base/archiva-proxy/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archiva/proxy/ archiva-base/archiva-pro

, at 2:01 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote: The branch for 1.0.x is now ready: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archiva/branches/archiva-1.0.x It is branched from -r615120 so the patch for MRM-667 needs to be applied, as well as Nicolas' commit for MRM-670.. Thanks, Deng On Jan

[VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0.1

Hi Everyone, The Archiva 1.0.1 release candidate has been prepared. JPOX was upgraded from 1.1.7 to 1.1.9 to fix an issue that results for Archiva to hang. Other changes for this release include an improvement for maven 1 artifact resolution and revisions in the documentation. You can take a

Re: svn commit: r609485 - /maven/archiva/trunk/pom.xml

Thanks for the catch Wendy :) I've already added the jpox repo in the pom to be used for now. Thanks, Deng Wendy Smoak wrote: JPOX 1.1.9 is not in the central repo, so this change breaks the build. http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/jpox/jpox/

Re: Help on how Archiva consumers work

Thanks Dario! :) I'll try to take a look at it today or over the weekend. -Deng Da'rio Oliveros wrote: I just posted a new comment at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-622 by attaching the patch files for its fix. Hope it helps. Any comments or suggestions will be welcome.

Re: Help on how Archiva consumers work

Hi Dario, I think the solution you've proposed would work.. to implement it, these are probably what you need to change in Archiva: 1. update the UnprocessedArtifactPredicate - add the constraint to get the SNAPSHOT artifacts as you've mentioned (there is a 'snapshot' field in the

[Results] [vote] Release Archiva 1.0

Below are the results of this vote: +6 Binding Votes (Brett, Joakim, Wendy, Fabrice, John and Myself) +0 Non-binding Vote (Nicolas) Yay! Thanks to everyone's efforts to finally get 1.0 out :) I'll finalize the release and will send an update again. Thanks, Deng On 11/23/07, Maria Odea Ching

Re: svn commit: r594832 - /maven/archiva/trunk/archiva-site/src/site/apt/adminguide/repositories.apt

-- + Maria Odea Ching + -- + 13 Nov 2007 + -- + +~~ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one +~~ or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file +~~ distributed with this work for additional information +~~ regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file

[ANNOUNCE] Archiva 1.0-beta-4 Released

Hi Everyone, The Maven Archiva team is pleased to announce the release of Archiva 1.0Beta 4. Archiva is a build artifact repository manager for use with build tools such as Maven, Continuum and Ant. It has features like repository search and browse, securing repositories, identifying unknown

Re: Archiva installation documentation on 'all' J2EE containers

Thanks Emmanuel :-) -Deng Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I documented Continuum installation on Tomcat, Jetty, JBoss, Geronimo and Glassfish. I documented installations of the standalone version on few OS. I let you look at it if you want to reuse it for Archiva too because the doc is very

Re: Site and parent changes

+1, I like it too it's way more interesting than Archiva's competitors' sites ;-) -Deng On 11/12/07, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like it, the download box dealio is pretty slick. jesse On Nov 11, 2007 12:21 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I alluded to in my

[VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-4

Hi Everyone, Archiva 1.0-beta-4 is now ready for release. The highlights of this release are: - security applied in repository browse and search (only those repositories where the user has permissions are accessible to that user) - fixes in repository purge - improved logging - additional fixes

Release Archiva 1.0-beta-4

Hi Everyone, I'll be releasing Archiva 1.0-beta-4 in 3 hours in preparation for 1.0.That'll be around 1:45PM my time. If there are any objections to this, please say so immediately :-) Thanks, Deng

Re: [Planning] Documentation for 1.0

Joakim Erdfelt wrote: Maria Odea Ching wrote: The outline looks good to me (yay 1.0!) Time for a mexican wave... \o\ \o/ /o/ I just have a few questions/suggestions here: - I assume that the proxying would fall under the Using Archiva as a * Repository sections

Re: [Update 1] Documentation for 1.0

And I'll take the following: - Browsing - Reports - Runtime Configuration Repositories - Runtime Configuration Consumers -Deng Joakim Erdfelt wrote: I've added the appropriate outline as discussed here in the mailing list to svn. The results of the new outline can be seen at

[ANNOUNCE] Archiva 1.0 Beta 3 Released

Hi Everyone, The Maven Archiva team is pleased to announce the release of Archiva 1.0Beta 3. Archiva is a build artifact repository manager for use with build tools such as Maven, Continuum and Ant. It has features like repository search and browse, securing repositories, identifying unknown

[RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3 (Postpone the release)

-beta-3 in the source repo and revert the version in trunk to 1.0-beta-3-SNAPSHOT. Thanks, Deng Maria Odea Ching wrote: Hi All, Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release. The highlights of this release are: - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers) - fixes

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

Sorry, this is the correct url for the binaries.. :) http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/archiva/1.0-beta-3/ -Deng On 10/22/07, James William Dumay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure if I can vote or not but heres my +1. James On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 13:31 +0800, Maria Odea Ching wrote

Releasing 1.0-beta-3

Hi Everyone, Time to prepare for another release again :-) I've listed below the 1.0-beta-3 issues that were already resolved and those that are still open/in-progress.. 1. Fixed/Resolved (we have a long list for this release.. many thanks to Joakim and for everyone who helped and

Re: Archiva Consumers question

The db scanning is basically just querying the artifacts from the database. The list of queried artifacts are iterated and database consumers perform specific actions on each iteration.. Some of these actions are: 1. Adding the project models of the artifact to the database - during repo

Re: svn commit: r584735 - in /maven/archiva/trunk: archiva-base/archiva-consumers/archiva-database-consumers/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archiva/consumers/database/ archiva-base/archiva-consumers/a

Okey dokey :) Thanks Joakim! -Deng Joakim Erdfelt wrote: Maria Odea Ching wrote: Brett Porter wrote: Hi Deng, On 15/10/2007, at 7:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [MRM-37 and MRM-527] - added code for cleaning up the database of artifacts that are no longer existing in the repository

Re: Monster Commit Breakdown - svn commit: r583412 [1/8]

Thanks for this email Joakim :) It helped people to better understand all the recent changes in the codebase. I admit I have also panicked when I saw some of the classes I was using in my codes (that I still haven't committed yet) were removed, but after reading the past threads plus this

Re: Details for the upcoming 1.0-beta-2 release

, Maria Odea Ching wrote: Hi All, We're now preparing for the release of Archiva 1.0-beta-2. The release is scheduled to take place over this coming weekend, and the details are specified below. 1. Issues that have already been Fixed/Closed: - MRM-408 - The mvn deploy:deploy-file command

Re: redback-1.0-alpha-2 released

hooray! +1 to this thanks Jesse :) -Deng Jesse McConnell wrote: I released the alpha-2 of redback 1.0 this morning. It is working its way out into the main repositories and when its there I think we can safely upgrade continuum and archiva to it. Rather excited, this is the first time we

[VOTE] Release Archiva-1.0-beta-1

Hi All, Archiva 1.0-beta-1 is now ready for release. The highlights of this release are: - reporting - repository purge - fixes in configuration, search and browse You can access the release notes for Archiva 1.0-beta-1 here:

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva-1.0-beta-1

Sorry, I forgot to include the known issues for this release. Here they are: - MRM-454 (Index not updated after repository purge) - MRM-455 (Repository Browse not updated after repository purge although the database is updated during the purge) Thanks, Deng On 8/7/07, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL

Re: reporting jasper reports

Brett Porter wrote: Hi all, This is mainly for Deng and Teody as I've seen them working through the issue for reporting... I took a look at the latest patch and it's looking pretty good. I did go to check about the jasper reports license, though, and it appears from the POM that it is

Archiva releases (Take 2)

Hi All, We (Brett, Joakim and I) have segregated the issues in Jira to prep for the upcoming 1.0 release (finally! :-) ). Anyway, there'll be two beta releases first before 1.0. So..here's the plan (excerpted from Brett): - finish all issues for 1.0-beta-1 - then move on to 1.0-beta-2 issues

Re: Archiva releases (Take 2)

Ok, thanks Fabrice :) I'll add that to the list. -Deng Fabrice Bellingard wrote: I've closed MRM-373 (Unable to delete the pre-configured example network proxy), which was no longer valid. Fabrice. On 8/1/07, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, We (Brett, Joakim and I

Re: Repository purge (MRM-294 and MRM-275)

Brett Porter wrote: On 25/07/2007, at 8:54 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote: 3. artifact count to be retained is this within the given version? ie, keep X builds of this snapshot. I think this would be specified for all snapshots, not per version. It would be a long list if it would

Question about pom versions

Hi Everyone, I have a question about the validation of the poms.. For example, I have an artifact artifactA-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom but the in-pom version specified is 2.3-20061118.060205-2. Is this considered to be an invalid/corrupt pom? Thanks, Deng

Re: [Reporting] UI via JasperReports

I don't really know about its licensing though.. -Deng Brett Porter wrote: Me too - 2 years ago, I did both the html paging, and emailing pdfs of the same thing, plus letting people write their own reports to run. how does the licensing fit these days? On 19/07/2007, at 12:53 PM, Maria Odea

Re: [Reporting] UI via JasperReports

I had some experience with JasperReports and iReport. I'll be happy to help out, though I may have to polish up on that. It's been 2 years since I last used it. -Deng Joakim Erdfelt wrote: I'm about to integrate JasperReports into archiva for report presentation in archiva. This will be a

Re: Suggestions/thoughts anyone? (MRM-426)

the timestamped version to have it's own download list? brett joakim: yah, when you navigate to the SNAPSHOT, you should effectively end up at the latest timestamped one (unless there is a non-unique-versioned one) brett it's just a pointer, not a view -Deng Maria Odea Ching wrote: Hi Everyone

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-alpha-1

+1 Everything on the release notes seems to be in place. Thanks Joakim :-) -Deng Joakim Erdfelt wrote: Archiva 1.0-alpha-1 was tagged and built this afternoon. The proposed distribution, including binary distributions, and signatures can be found here: