Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva-1.0-beta-3 (Take 2)

2007-11-01 Thread John Tolentino
+1 :) On 10/31/07, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's my +1, btw :) -Deng On 10/30/07, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, Take 2.. :) Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release. The highlights of this release are: - major fixes in path

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva-1.0-beta-3 (Take 2)

2007-10-30 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Still +1! :-) Fabrice On 10/30/07, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, Take 2.. :) Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release. The highlights of this release are: - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers) - fixes in updating of

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3 (Postpone the release)

2007-10-29 Thread Brett Porter
Any reason not to move forward now? (time permitting, of course :) Things seem to be ok at the moment... I'm using the current trunk and did a whole lot of building without a local repo with a mix of new and existing artifacts yesterday without issues (other than one or two non-blocking

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3 (Postpone the release)

2007-10-29 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
I say do it now, and start the vote now. I've got a security related issue I'm working on now. But I'd like to vet that for the 1.0-beta-4 release, not this 1.0-beta-3 release. - Joakim Brett Porter wrote: Any reason not to move forward now? (time permitting, of course :) Things seem to be

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3 (Postpone the release)

2007-10-27 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 10/25/07, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These are the results of the vote: +3 Binding votes (Fabrice, Brett and Myself) -1 Binding vote (Arnaud) +2 Non-binding votes (James, Olivier) With all the regressions that were discovered in 1.0-beta-3, it seems that it would be

[RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3 (Postpone the release)

2007-10-26 Thread Maria Odea Ching
These are the results of the vote: +3 Binding votes (Fabrice, Brett and Myself) -1 Binding vote (Arnaud) +2 Non-binding votes (James, Olivier) With all the regressions that were discovered in 1.0-beta-3, it seems that it would be better to postpone the release. I will remove the tag for

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

2007-10-23 Thread nicolas de loof
MRM-565 created. As this makes archiva totaly unusable to maven1 users, I consider this as blocker, but maven2-only users will never get this issue, and this is only a beta-release. Based on this release often principle wins. I've no idea how many archiva users use it as maven1 proxy. In my case

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

2007-10-23 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
For MRM-561 I forgot to say that there's a work around : You delete the managed repository. Cheers Arnaud On 23/10/2007, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 23/10/2007, at 6:52 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 10/22/07, Joakim Erdfelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This release has a few

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

2007-10-22 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Of course +1! :-) Fabrice On 10/22/07, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release. The highlights of this release are: - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers) - fixes in updating of metadata files -

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

2007-10-22 Thread Brett Porter
+1, thanks Deng On 22/10/2007, at 3:31 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote: Hi All, Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release. The highlights of this release are: - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers) - fixes in updating of metadata files - fixes in proxy

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

2007-10-22 Thread olivier lamy
+1 I found the following logger a little noisy for a end user distribution : logger name=org.apache.maven.archiva level value=debug / /logger -- Olivier 2007/10/22, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1, thanks Deng On 22/10/2007, at 3:31 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote: Hi All,

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

2007-10-22 Thread Brett Porter
On 22/10/2007, at 11:57 PM, olivier lamy wrote: +1 I found the following logger a little noisy for a end user distribution : logger name=org.apache.maven.archiva level value=debug / /logger agreed: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-185 -- Olivier 2007/10/22, Brett

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

2007-10-22 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
MRM-560 : Dependency Tree causes an Exception MRM-561 : Error 500 while deleting a proxy connector Those are the ones. - Joakim Wendy Smoak wrote: On 10/22/07, Joakim Erdfelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This release has a few exceptions visible to the user. (MRM-560, MRM-561) Should we fix

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

2007-10-22 Thread Brett Porter
On 23/10/2007, at 6:52 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 10/22/07, Joakim Erdfelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This release has a few exceptions visible to the user. (MRM-560, MRM-561) Should we fix these, and wait on 1.0-beta-3? or just make 1.0-beta-4 come out quickly after 1.0-beta-3? I don't

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

2007-10-22 Thread Brett Porter
On 23/10/2007, at 12:45 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: and when I start it I have it saying welcome you to maven Archiva Unknown, already fixed this one on trunk instead to have 1.0-beta-3 Otherwise it seems to work fine (tested only with maven 2). +1 On 22/10/2007, Brett Porter [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

2007-10-21 Thread James William Dumay
Not sure if I can vote or not but heres my +1. James On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 13:31 +0800, Maria Odea Ching wrote: Hi All, Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release. The highlights of this release are: - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers) - fixes in

Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0-beta-3

2007-10-21 Thread Maria Odea Ching
Sorry, this is the correct url for the binaries.. :) http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/archiva/1.0-beta-3/ -Deng On 10/22/07, James William Dumay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure if I can vote or not but heres my +1. James On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 13:31 +0800, Maria Odea Ching wrote: