On 6/23/07, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok, sorry for the question. I didn't remember.
No apology necessary... I wasn't very clear about my plans. :)
It's staged here if anyone wants a preview:
http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/archiva/1.0-alpha-2/
I'll call a vote after I
ok, sorry for the question. I didn't remember.
Arnaud
On 23/06/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/07, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't we have to vote. I'm not specially for this, because we are
working on
> alpha, but what about apache rules ??
Absolutely!
On 6/23/07, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't we have to vote. I'm not specially for this, because we are working on
alpha, but what about apache rules ??
Absolutely! I'll stage it on people.a.o and we'll vote on the actual
proposed distributions. It's not "a release" until it
Don't we have to vote. I'm not specially for this, because we are working on
alpha, but what about apache rules ??
Arnaud
On 23/06/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/20/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I won't have time to test until Friday, but if everything seems to
On 6/20/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I won't have time to test until Friday, but if everything seems to be
in order I'll go ahead with alpha-2 so we have another milestone to
work from.
It looks good to me. I'll do 1.0-alpha-2 on Saturday afternoon (GMT
-7) from trunk, so please
On 6/19/07, Fabrice Bellingard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
which proxy related bugs do you think of? I've tested Archiva proxying for
some days, and it works pretty good for me. I mean, if we'd have to release
alpha-2, I wouldn't say no. :-)
That's good to know. I see 14 closed issues in alpha
ok, fine !
thanks a lot !!
Arnaud
On 20/06/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
m1 is just postponed to a release after 1.0-alpha-2, and before 1.0-final
It's not out, it's not forgotten. :-)
The "1.0.x" fix version is just a holding area for 1.0 related jiras.
Things that are post-
m1 is just postponed to a release after 1.0-alpha-2, and before 1.0-final
It's not out, it's not forgotten. :-)
The "1.0.x" fix version is just a holding area for 1.0 related jiras.
Things that are post-1.0 are in the "Future" fix version right now.
When I get back from my various trips these
I don't agree to postpone m1 support for 1.0.X. It's one of the feature
which create the difference with others proxy repo tools... It's the feature
which help to install archiva in corporate contexts...
Arnaud
On 20/06/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fabrice,
Excellent news! :-
Fabrice,
Excellent news! :-)
Check out jira.
We recently moved a large chunk of issues out of 1.0-alpha-2 to the
nebulous 1.0.x fix version.
The remaining list in 1.0-alpha-2 I consider to be important enough to
address for 1.0-alpha-2, even if that means, a message on the jira that
says "ye
How does the weekend of June 23rd sound for another Archiva alpha
release? Joakim, are you already planning to do one before then?
Any thoughts on how many of the 110 issues marked for 1.0-alpha-2 in
jira could actually make it in that two-week time frame?
Thanks,
Wendy
11 matches
Mail list logo
