Okay then, I think I can start the release now :)
-Deng
Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
I say do it now, and start the vote now.
I've got a security related issue I'm working on now.
But I'd like to vet that for the 1.0-beta-4 release, not this
1.0-beta-3 release.
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
Any re
I say do it now, and start the vote now.
I've got a security related issue I'm working on now.
But I'd like to vet that for the 1.0-beta-4 release, not this 1.0-beta-3
release.
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
Any reason not to move forward now? (time permitting, of course :)
Things seem to be o
Any reason not to move forward now? (time permitting, of course :)
Things seem to be ok at the moment... I'm using the current trunk and
did a whole lot of building without a local repo with a mix of new
and existing artifacts yesterday without issues (other than one or
two non-blocking one
I tested the last snapshot of archiva and now everything seems to work fine.
Arnaud
On 10/26/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> These are the results of the vote:
>
> +3 Binding votes (Fabrice, Brett and Myself)
> -1 Binding vote (Arnaud)
> +2 Non-binding votes (James, Olivier)
>
On 28/10/2007, at 12:53 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 10/25/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These are the results of the vote:
+3 Binding votes (Fabrice, Brett and Myself)
-1 Binding vote (Arnaud)
+2 Non-binding votes (James, Olivier)
With all the regressions that were discovered
On 10/25/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These are the results of the vote:
>
> +3 Binding votes (Fabrice, Brett and Myself)
> -1 Binding vote (Arnaud)
> +2 Non-binding votes (James, Olivier)
>
> With all the regressions that were discovered in 1.0-beta-3, it seems
> that it would
