Hi Patsy,
I would probably put the microfilm number in as an External Document. The
Location doesn't *have* to be a URL, even if it's preferred.
--Rachel
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:07 PM Hand, Sarit wrote:
> HI,
>
>
>
> Are you creating Resource Records or Archival Object records for the
>
I'm having trouble logging in to comment (or even viewing issues, what's
up, Atlassian??), so I'll respond here.
*769: *Yes, please!
*773: *I agree with Ed Busch that both options (this and 950) should be
offered. 950 is about using CSS to print the current webpage rather than
the full finding
Do you by any chance have multiple repositories? Agents will only show
related resources and accessions of the repository you currently have
selected.
--Rachel
--
Please note that I currently *do not have access to ARS email*. If you need
to contact me, use my LAC address:
relevant field(s) in the relevant name table(s).
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Alicia
>
> Alicia Detelich
> Archivist
> Manuscripts and Archives
> Yale University Libraries
>
> From: on behalf
> of Rachel Donahue
> Reply-To: Archivesspace Users Group
Hi all,
I'm running some bulk updates to Agents (in this case people) via the API
and noticed some rather odd changes to sub-records when I check the JSON
after successfully running the update.
1. Every sub-record (e.g. names, telephones) has replaced "created_by" with
the user authenticated by
