John,
If I can assist, please let me know.
-Marc
From: John Curran [mailto:jcur...@arin.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 11:35 PM
To: Lindsey, Marc
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] FYI -- RIPE-605 Services to Legacy Internet Resource
Holders
On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Li
On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Lindsey, Marc
mailto:mlind...@lb3law.com>> wrote:
Hello John,
On Feb 17, 2014, at 5:30 PM you wrote:
“As noted earlier, RIPE 605 covers quite a bit of ground; could you be more
specific about what specific policy changes you are seeking?”
I agree that RIPE 605 co
Hello John,
On Feb 17, 2014, at 5:30 PM you wrote:
"As noted earlier, RIPE 605 covers quite a bit of ground; could you be more
specific about what specific policy changes you are seeking?"
I agree that RIPE 605 covers a lot of ground, and there are opportunities to
improve it. From my perspec
Marty -
Thanks for working on this... it is looking much closer to an policy
proposal. I'll keep my remarks brief, simply to facilitate its
consideration by the Advisory Council -
On Feb 18, 2014, at 6:38 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> This is a bit confusing since "Principles" can be consi
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:54 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2014, at 3:15 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
[ clip ]
> Top priority at this point is a clear in-scope problem statement and
> suggested
> changes to existing policy text. I will note that the policy development
> process
> is us
Kevin is setting up a conference call based on your availability, so yes. Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 17, 2014, at 9:54 PM, "Martin Hannigan" wrote:
>
> Let me know if we can work on this before the meeting.
>
> Side note, I noticed that in January 2013 there was a PDP
> simplification b
