[arin-ppml] Weekly posting summary for p...@arin.net

Total of 33 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 21 00:53:02 EDT 2019 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 9.09% |3 | 11.26% |78698 | fhfredi...@gmail.com 6.06% |2 | 10.30% |72013 |

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN 2019-13 ARIN 2019-13 ARIN Member Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion.

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:55 PM Amy Potter wrote: > Legal restrictions require an in-country legal entity to hold ownership > of the service providing network including the registration of Autonomous > system number used for peering. This is called "rent seeking behavior" by the way. Google it

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

Oppose. On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:27 AM Alyssa Moore wrote: > Hi folks, > > Trying to do a temperature check here. If you're following this thread, > please indicate whether you support or oppose this draft policy. > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:42 AM David Farmer wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun,

[arin-ppml] ARIN 2019-13 ARIN 2019-13 ARIN Member Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion.

Hi all, I have revised the text of ARIN 2019-13 ARIN Member Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion. The previous version provided suggested language to add to section 9 of NRPM, without an exact location in the text. This version just places that language directly in the text. the added text is in bold

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

Oppose. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 21, 2019, at 02:56, Roberts, Orin wrote: Opposed! “ARIN participating in the market seems distasteful and counter to its overall mission”. I would advocate a policy placing those resources for distribution under Section 4.4 (Micro Allocations ie /24) and

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

I'm in favor abolishing the waiting list. The auction language doesn't belong in this policy. *"Add policy section: 4.1.10 - Returned and Reclaimed Resources* *ARIN will auction returned and reclaimed IPv4 number resources to recipients qualified under Section 8.3. Revenues realized from this

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

I oppose the RIR to participate on any market place and thefore to keep the waiting list, BUT limited to a maximum of /22 regardless of the size of who request and ONLY for newcomers as it is in others RIRs. A single /24 is useless for majority of uses, even for CGNAT and other techniques that

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

I oppose this draft policy. — Brian Jones, CSP, CSM, CSPO NIS Virginia Tech bjo...@vt.edu On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:27 PM Alyssa Moore wrote: > Hi folks, > > Trying to do a temperature check here. If you're following this thread, > please indicate whether you support or oppose this draft

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

I am for this policy. Robert Clarke Mobile: +1 (206) 350-9699 > On Jun 20, 2019, at 9:27 AM, Alyssa Moore wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Trying to do a temperature check here. If you're following this thread, > please indicate whether you support or oppose this draft policy. > >> On Mon, Jun

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 168, Issue 32

all mission, but doesn't directly violate > its Articles and Bylaws. > > That said that doesn't mean ARIN can't implement the policy, but > these risks need to be evaluated when compared to other > alternatives being considered, along

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List

Oppose On 6/20/2019 12:27 PM, Alyssa Moore wrote: Hi folks, Trying to do a temperature check here. If you're following this thread, please indicate whether you support or oppose this draft policy. On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:42 AM David Farmer > wrote: On Sun,

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

ARIN would be a competitor AND a regulator in the marketplace. I oppose the idea and support the idea of placing returned and revoked addresses in 4.10. Actually I proposed that as a new policy a few days ago but maybe it got lost or I filled out the template wrong. Regards, Mike Burns

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

IE ARIN would be a competitor in a marketplace for which it holds a monopoly. Orin Roberts IP PROVISIONING Bell Canada -Original Message- From: ARIN-PPML On Behalf Of hostmas...@uneedus.com Sent: June-20-19 12:57 PM To: ARIN-PPML List Subject: [EXT]Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7:

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

Opposed! “ARIN participating in the market seems distasteful and counter to its overall mission”. I would advocate a policy placing those resources for distribution under Section 4.4 (Micro Allocations ie /24) and 4.10 ( IPv4 block facilitate to IPv6 deployment). Orin Roberts IP

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

Oppose I have no problem with the idea of getting rid of the waiting list part of the proposal. I do have a problem with an auction, as I think it will cause lots of issues when ARIN revokes resources, because it certainly will be alleged that "ARIN did it for the money", as has already

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

Oppose. On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 8:27 AM Alyssa Moore wrote: > Hi folks, > > Trying to do a temperature check here. If you're following this thread, > please indicate whether you support or oppose this draft policy. > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:42 AM David Farmer wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun,

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-7: Elimination of the Waiting List (was:Re: Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests

Hi folks, Trying to do a temperature check here. If you're following this thread, please indicate whether you support or oppose this draft policy. On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:42 AM David Farmer wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 2:50 PM Mueller, Milton L > wrote: > >> OK, I’ve read it, and