In re-reading the staff comments for ARIN-2019-10, I would support the
staff's recommendations to instead make changes within section 8.4
instead of 8.2, but that is not what the current policy text as written
does. As written I believe the new text is independent of section 8.4 and
would allow IPv
Total of 11 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri 11 Oct 2019 12:53:05 AM EDT
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
54.55% |6 | 55.55% |92802 | o...@delong.com
18.18% |2 | 25.41% |42449 | far...@umn.edu
I'm fine with what Staff has been doing, the current inter-RIR policy in
section 8.4 clearly doesn't allow IPv6 transfers.
However, the new text added to section 8.2 seems to clearly allow inter-RIR
M&A transfers independent of what section 8.4 has to say and its exclusion
of IPv6.
Current M&A tra
Are you asking why the proposed policy doesn’t effect this change to current
staff action, or are you asking why staff action didn’t change when they
started accepting 8.2-based inter-RIR transfers without a policy change?
Owen
> On Sep 30, 2019, at 11:45 , David Farmer wrote:
>
> I have a q
> On Oct 1, 2019, at 15:13 , David Farmer wrote:
>
> Because of an off-list conversation I'd like to add I think the expectations
> of RFC2008 still exist in our policy manual today;
>
> 4.2.1.1. Purpose
>
> ARIN allocates blocks of IP addresses to ISPs for the purpose of reassigning
> and
> Second is the point that one of the business cases for leasing is for
> spamming. This is something to consider, but I would like for you to put
> yourself into the position of a Lessor. The Lessor knows his blocks will
> lose value if they are blacklisted, so they take steps to mitigate this
> On Sep 30, 2019, at 11:02 , Mike Burns wrote:
>
> Hi Fernando,
>
> You said “RIR is and has always been the one who drives the resources to be
> efficientlly assigned by analysing justifications not private transfer
> companies. If an organization is not using resouces efficiently it eith
Neither in favor nor opposed to the intent of the proposal at this time. I can
see both sides…
Allowing this would potentially increase whois accuracy since currently leases
are happening without recording or registration.
Allowing this would encourage/normalize this behavior which seems, more o
