On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 1:13 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Oct 10, 2019, a 20:34 , David Farmer wrote:
>
> I'm fine with what Staff has been doing, the current inter-RIR policy in
> section 8.4 clearly doesn't allow IPv6 transfers.
>
> Staff has been currently allowing M&A inter-RIR transfers of IP
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 20:34 , David Farmer wrote:
>
> I'm fine with what Staff has been doing, the current inter-RIR policy in
> section 8.4 clearly doesn't allow IPv6 transfers.
Staff has been currently allowing M&A inter-RIR transfers of IPv4 and ASNs even
though there’s no policy permitt
Agree with this point od view and I remain opposed to the proposal as
written with any possibility to transfer IPv6 and 32Bit ASN Inter-RIR even
for M&A.
Suggest it to be more clear in the text.
Fernando Frediani
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, 22:35 David Farmer, wrote:
> I'm fine with what Staff has be
On 10 Oct 2019, at 1:07 PM, Owen DeLong
mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote:
On Sep 30, 2019, at 11:02 , Mike Burns
mailto:m...@iptrading.com>> wrote:
Hi Fernando,
You said “RIR is and has always been the one who drives the resources to be
efficientlly assigned by analysing justifications not priv
