Fernando -
Again, please do not make assertions regarding the structure and governance of
ARIN without direct knowledge of their accuracy. Your statement below ("What
I mentioned several times, is that the Board *can not* make rules for resources
allocation which is a sole prerogative from th
I am not exactly sure what are you trying to ensure here, but most of
what you mentioned below is well known and not disputed.
What I mentioned several times, is that the Board *can not* make rules
for resources allocation which is a sole prerogative from this forum.
Board may or may not adopt
There is no argument here.
Happy pandemic Saturday, all.
-M<
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:15 PM John Curran wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2021, at 8:37 PM, Fernando Frediani
> wrote:
>
>
> I am sure we are talking about the same thing David.
>
> The authority to establish the rules in which resources are
On 16 Jan 2021, at 8:37 PM, Fernando Frediani
mailto:fhfredi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I am sure we are talking about the same thing David.
The authority to establish the rules in which resources are allocated and
revoked is a prerogative from this forum (which includes members and
non-members),
I am sure we are talking about the same thing David.
The authority to establish the rules in which resources are allocated
and revoked is a prerogative from this forum (which includes members and
non-members), as in any other RIR. The PDP guarantees the Board the
ultimate authority to adopt a
No it doesn’t, that authority comes from the membership, not this policy
forum. Yes, there is significant overlap between the two, but they are
distinct groups.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 18:23 Fernando Frediani
wrote:
> Hi David
>
> I am not against it has, but it does because the authority given
Hi David
I am not against it has, but it does because the authority given to them
for that come from this forum (for the revocation part not the fee
structure).
4.2.1.2 makes it very clear and doesn't go into any operational details
and this proposal is willing to remove it.
Fernando
On 16/
The Board has the power to set fees, which includes at least the power to
revoke resources for nonpayment. If it did not, the power to set fees would
be meaningless.
Thanks
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 5:29 PM Fernando Frediani
wrote:
> John, let's make it simple: The Board has no power to *make and
John, let's make it simple: The Board has no power to *make and adopt
policies* concerning resources allocation without passing in this forum.
Look: make policies not just adopt them !
Yes we all understand it has the ultimate authority to adopt all ARIN's
policies, but it *cannot make and ado
On 16 Jan 2021, at 3:39 PM, Fernando Frediani
mailto:fhfredi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Exactly John, that's why the Board of Trustees or equivalent body has to
approve policies that advances from this forum, to make sure they are in line
with the applicable law, operational impacts, etc. But the Bo
Owen, IPv6 hesitation is very common in schools and even at many
universities. Part of it is that with smaller staff, it's generally not
risen up as a priority. (Sorry to be off topic.)
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 1:26 AM Owen DeLong wrote:
> Unless you consider 10+ year old technology “new”, IPv6 d
Exactly John, that's why the Board of Trustees or equivalent body has to
approve policies that advances from this forum, to make sure they are in
line with the applicable law, operational impacts, etc. But the Board
has not power to make policies or define rules for allocation of revocation.
M
On 16 Jan 2021, at 10:35 AM, Fernando Frediani
mailto:fhfredi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Owen
*Any* revocation must always be governed by this forum which is the only body
who has power to define allocation policies and therefore revocation. RIRs
don't have power for that, except on exception
Hello Owen
*Any* revocation must always be governed by this forum which is the only
body who has power to define allocation policies and therefore
revocation. RIRs don't have power for that, except on exceptional
situations (section 10.1) which have to be confirmed by this forum.
The RIR, base
The petition for Board of Trustees adoption consideration of "ARIN-2020-2:
Reinstatement of Organizations Removed from Waitlist by Implementation of
ARIN-2019-16" received the support of at least 25 people from 25 organizations
within the allotted timeframe of five days.
Per the Policy Devel
15 matches
Mail list logo
