On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 1:35 PM WOOD Alison * DAS
wrote:
> The Policy Experience Working Group would like your feedback
> on a potential policy idea: With waiting list times being in years,
> should an org be eligible to get a small block (e.g. /24) via 8.3/8.4
> and stay on the waiting list?
I d
If the requestor's use case works with sub-/24, they can request it. If
they want a /24, they can request that. I agree there are lots of use cases
for which /24 is a de facto minimum (even for MDN when you have a larger
covering aggregate you can announce). But there are some use cases for
which s
The problem is everyone has their filters set to not accept smaller than /24s. It sounds like a simple fix but it’s like herding cats. Justin Sent from my iPhoneOn Jan 27, 2023, at 9:03 PM, Scott Leibrand wrote:IMO orgs who can get by with a smaller block should be able to request one (with no l
IMO orgs who can get by with a smaller block should be able to request one
(with no lower limit: if they really want a /25, they should be able to ask
for that). But orgs who receive a block should be removed from the waiting
list and must reapply to rejoin it, putting them at the back of the list.
I posted a tread to the NANOG list along these lines. There are many (in the dozens) of networks I run across wanting to participate in BGP. They don’t need a /24 but that is the accepted norm. It would be a major undertaking to have people change filters. I think modern routers could accommodat
Hello
My answer is absolutely not to stay in the waiting list. Waiting list
should not be a hope for majority that are there, only for those who
have very little and may be able to wait as long as necessary to get a
few more to keep going with their business. Any other needs that cannot
wait
Hello!
The Policy Experience Report Working Group has been working on the Policy
Experience Report from ARIN 50. I would appreciate your feedback on the
following issue regarding transferring waitlist space.
The current wait list criteria is:
* Must have a /20 or less in total IPv4 hol