there any breakdown of how MANY total orgs with no RSA, and how many of
them are class "A" (/8), versus just holding a single /24?
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, John Curran wrote:
On 14 Apr 2022, at 3:25 PM, hostmas...@uneedus.com
ct
t: 907-868-0116 | w: www.gci.com
From: ARIN-PPML on behalf of hostmas...@uneedus.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 8:10 AM
To: Rob Seastrom
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended D
Pv6 to
their networks. This is what the 2007 statement suggests.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, Michel Py wrote:
hostmas...@uneedus.com wrote :
I noticed this item from 7 May 2007 that I think would support my suggestion:
Unless I have been caught in
ugh it may be.
My 2 cents.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 2, 2019, at 3:35 PM, "hostmas...@uneedus.com"
wrote:
Many hosting and access providers like to give each paying customer their own IPv4
address, since it simplifies DMCA compliance. Otherwise the hosting provider needs to
get i
The member list does not help, as I understand that many legacy holders
have other resources that are not legacy such as IPv6 holdings and thus
are members as well. Of course if they are a member, it it hard to
complain about them having legacy resources, when they are otherwise a
member.
Si
[far...@umn.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:53 AM
To: hostmas...@uneedus.com
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Revised: Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of
Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6
[External Email]
Here is a slightly different formula
It looks to me like as far as using SWIP as a tool to track IPv6
assignments so that we know if they have reached the 75% mark to ask for
more, this is not happening. As reported, NOONE has come back to ARIN at
this time for more IPv6 space because they have exhausted their initital
allocation
residential privacy (if applicable) per the customer request.
___Jason
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:42 AM, John Curran wrote:
On 17 Jul 2017, at 9:47 AM, hostmas...@uneedus.com wrote:
,,,
This is the problem. ARIN is not a carrier. While disclosure to ARIN
to obtain number resources for the con
have found the correct order
on CPNI.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, John Curran wrote:
On 17 Jul 2017, at 1:04 AM,
hostmas...@uneedus.com<mailto:hostmas...@uneedus.com> wrote:
John,
I think this is the FCC ruling he speaks of, and it d
On Sat, 27 May 2017, Peter Thimmesch wrote:
Albert,
I concur 100% with your goal here and believe that there is a path to
creating an equitable policy. Therefore I support, and ask others
responding to this thread, with the intent of your policy proposal.
The sole question, outside of "size
RFC 4291, section 2.5.4 provide that the interface ID is /64 for all
global unicast addresses, which is the reason that all v6 lan networks are
set to /64, and this should include p2p links
Network World at the time had quite a discussion about this and RFC 6164.
They point out that we have no
11 matches
Mail list logo
