Re: [arin-ppml] Request for Feedback: Draft Policy ARIN-2024-8 Restrict the Largest Initial IPv6 Allocation to /20

2024-08-13 Thread Matthew Wilder via ARIN-PPML
Hi PPML, Similar disclaimer to what Chris has shared, this opinion I am sharing is my own, and not that of the AC. Although I am not in favor of the policy right now, one question I think we should bear in mind for this discussion is the following. How many years do we hope IPv6 will last? I s

Re: [arin-ppml] Section 6.5.9 Community Network Allocations - Community Input for NRPM Working Group

2023-12-18 Thread Matthew Wilder via ARIN-PPML
cy exists, potentially resulting in > loss of the policy. > > Owen > > > On Dec 18, 2023, at 11:25, Matthew Wilder via ARIN-PPML < > arin-ppml@arin.net> wrote: > > Hello community members, > > Thank you to everyone who has provided inputs for the working group's

Re: [arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results - November 2023

2023-12-18 Thread Matthew Wilder via ARIN-PPML
Fernando, Indeed I think there is a great deal of public support for IXPs to be able to continue to be an important part of the landscape. We as shepherds of ARIN-2023-2 are considering all of the feedback we are seeing on PPML. I just wish to clarify, by IXP do you mean a public Internet Exchang

[arin-ppml] Section 6.5.9 Community Network Allocations - Community Input for NRPM Working Group

2023-12-18 Thread Matthew Wilder via ARIN-PPML
Hello community members, Thank you to everyone who has provided inputs for the working group's consideration with regard to Section 6 policies. There have been great discussions that we as a working group (and Advisory Council more broadly) are taking note of. In the final Section 6 topic that th

[arin-ppml] Section 6.3 Possible Retirement (NRPM Working Group engagement)

2023-11-27 Thread Matthew Wilder via ARIN-PPML
Hi PPML subscribers, As a continuation of the series of discussions from the NRPM working group, we would like to direct discussions this week toward Section 6.3. Because Section 6 was a collaborative effort spanning RIRs, it did not dovetail perfectly into ARIN's PPML. Section 6.3 goals reflect

Re: [arin-ppml] Section 6.1 – Potential Simplification (from the NRPM Working Group)

2023-11-16 Thread Matthew Wilder via ARIN-PPML
Hello ARIN community members, I just want to remind you that we as a working group value your feedback and would welcome any input you might wish to offer as we consider possible changes to Section 6. As Chris mentioned, I wish to remind you that I will be posting another topic next week. For now

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2023-2: /26 initial IPv4 allocation for IXPs

2023-06-20 Thread Matthew Wilder via ARIN-PPML
Hi Owen, It sounds as though your opposition to this draft policy includes a concern that it is not technically sound. In what ways do you believe that this change would break the Internet or contort it? Thanks, Matthew On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 9:45 AM Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML < arin-ppml@arin

Re: [arin-ppml] LAST CALL - Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2022-11: Clean-up of NRPM – Introduction of Section 2.17

2023-04-24 Thread Matthew Wilder via ARIN-PPML
Support as written. *Matthew Wilder* Sr Engineer - IPv6, IP Address Management On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:41 AM Edward Diego wrote: > The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) met on 19 April 2023, and sent the > following Recommended Draft Policy to Last Call for an extended period with > communication

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2022-11: Clean-up of NRPM – Introduction of Section 2.17

2023-03-21 Thread Matthew Wilder via ARIN-PPML
Hi Bill, Speaking for myself here, not on behalf of ARIN AC, nor even NRPM WG, but as myself only. I am in favour of the policy as written. I had originally written the proposal for this draft policy which came from the NRPM Working Group to introduce a definition for Internet Number Resources b