Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-20: Transfer Policy Slow Start and Simplified Needs Verification

Good morning PPML, I just want to clarify that when Milton says "I want to make it clear that I will not count that as serious or justifiable opposition to a policy proposal in any AC deliberations.² he is only speaking for Milton and not for any of the other members of the AC. There are currently

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised text for Draft Policy 2014-1 (Out of region use)

Good morning PPML, Please provide comments in support or opposition as the plan is to vote to move this to Recommended Draft Status for the Baltimore meeting. Thanks, John On 7/25/14, 2:29 AM, "Milton L Mueller" mailto:muel...@syr.edu>> wrote: At the Chicago meeting there was support for thi

Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Reduce all Minimum Allocation/Assignment units to /24

ur Premium Sponsor" > > So, this could happen very soon.. > > >> On 14-04-29 03:30 PM, Sweeting, John wrote: >> Hi Derek, >> >> In a nutshell the shepherds assigned to this proposal have been asked to >> worked this to have it available and present it

Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Reduce all Minimum Allocation/Assignment units to /24

Hi Leif, That is covered under 4.3.2.1. Thanks, John On 4/29/14, 6:17 PM, "Leif Sawyer" mailto:lsaw...@gci.com>> wrote: Support. Let's make sure we get the end-user policy as well, though. (Per Derek's email) From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:ari

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-9: Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements

Niki In no way should you take Milton's reply as an official stance or answer from the AC. He should have made it quite clear that he was speaking only as Milton and in anyway representing the AC. Thank you John S Sent from my iPhone On Apr 3, 2014, at 4:45 PM, "xiaofan yang" mailto:nikiyan.

Re: [arin-ppml] [arin-discuss] Term Limit Proposal

is there anything further ARIN needs from the membership on the matter? --- Jesse Geddis LA Broadband On Apr 1, 2014, at 1:04 PM, "Sweeting, John" mailto:john.sweet...@twcable.com>> wrote: Jesse Not sure who else you are referring to but Chris is not a sitting A

Re: [arin-ppml] [arin-discuss] Term Limit Proposal

Jesse Not sure who else you are referring to but Chris is not a sitting AC member. Thanks John Sent from my iPhone On Apr 1, 2014, at 11:48 AM, "Jesse Geddis" mailto:je...@la-broadband.com>> wrote: Rotflol conspiracy theories abound. Completely ignoring the fact that the two folks to broache

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-12: Anti-hijack Policy

Hi David, Draft Policies only get posted to PPML once they are moved forward in the process to that state. That being said it was just posted as a DP this week, Tuesday. Discussions need to begin and it will also be presented and discussed at the PPM in Chicago. This is in accordance with the curr

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-9: Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements

Hi David I usually do not weigh in on active policy proposals but I did want to point out that a lot companies do not complete transfers during M&A activities simply because they do not have the resources to do so. The one (or half) person they have dealing with IP resources usually cannot even

Re: [arin-ppml] FYI -- RIPE-605 Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders

as a PDP > simplification by the board. Another discussion happened in February > 2013. There was an update by Bill Woodcock, the "PDP Simplification > Chair" and then nothing. Might be a good committee to breathe some > life back into. > > Thanks! > > -M< > &

Re: [arin-ppml] FYI -- RIPE-605 Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders

Since I just received confirmation from the Primary I can now let you know it will be Kevin as primary and Bill D as secondary. They will be reaching out to you ASAP. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do at this time. Thanks again -john Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2014, at

Re: [arin-ppml] FYI -- RIPE-605 Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders

The shepherds will be notified in the morning. Our next meeting is this Thursday so most likely not but we'll see. They should initially reach out to to tomorrow, I will notify you as soon as they accept the appointment. Thanks. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:52 PM, "Martin Hannigan"

Re: [arin-ppml] IANA advice re: Post Exhaustion IPv4 Allocation

Jason, I agree. At least for the ARIN AC the intent was that the first allocation would be immediately upon activation of Recovered IPv4 Pool and then again in each allocation period. On 12/4/13 8:37 AM, "Jason Schiller" mailto:jschil...@google.com>> wrote: It seems fairly clear to me that t

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles - revised

From: David Conrad mailto:d...@virtualized.org>> Date: Friday, September 20, 2013 9:04 AM To: CJ Aronson mailto:c...@daydream.com>> Cc: "arin-ppml@arin.net List" mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net>> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles - revised Hi

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles - revised

given the current text does not impact IANA, and that I was trying to get the community to consider the merits of a global policy and if we should move in that direction earlier in the process. Thanks, __Jason On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Sweeting, John mailto:john.sweet...@twcab

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles - revised

Thanks Jason. One other option, which I personally like, is that we can continue to process as is and then if/when there is a global opportunity initiated ARIN can participate in that as well. That one of the nice things about policy, it can be changed as required. From: Jason Schiller mailto

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles - revised

Bill Herrin, you are totally out of line here. Please clean it up, there is no excuse for your rudeness below. Period. On 7/10/13 8:47 AM, "William Herrin" wrote: >On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Bill Darte wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:55 PM, William Herrin wrote: > >>> Then perhaps w

Re: [arin-ppml] A Redefinition ofIPv4NeedpostARINrun-out(was:Re:Against2013-4)

Hi, If possible could we move this to a private conversation? This has all been aired on PPML several times before and at this point it serves no purpose. If we could please get back on track and focus on a current draft policy or proposal and state reasons for support or non support it would b

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles / Request for General Thoughts

Hi Bill, The AC has a call scheduled for this Thursday, an update will be posted after that. I will send you an update as well if you like. Thanks, John On 6/17/13 11:21 AM, "William Herrin" wrote: >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Sweeting, John > wrote: >> As wit

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles / Request for General Thoughts

Hi Bill, As with all policy proposals everything that is learned on the list will be taken to the PPM in October where the AC Shepherds will share these statistics along with other pertinent information and also take input at the meeting. We also had some input at the NANOG 58 PPC. Thanks for all