On Jun 13, 2013, at 8:35 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:05:12 -0400
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> It feels like we have been here before,
>
> "Mike Burns" wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>> I understand that there is a danger of overpurchasing (by whomever's
>> definition) that comes from the removal of a needs
.net
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 11:35 AM
To: Mike Burns
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] A Redefinition of IPv4 Need post
ARINrun-out(was:Re:Against 2013-4)
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:05:12 -0400
Hi Mike,
It feels like we have been here before,
"Mike Burns" wrote:
Hi Brian
Jones
To: Mike Burns
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net ; Mike Burns
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] A Redefinition of IPv4 Need post
ARINrun-out(was:Re:Against 2013-4)
Hi Mike,
I suppose it is just my old school thinking that you should be at least
"this tall&
rease the possibility for networking
instability and router misconfiguration issues.
--
Brian
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Brian Jones
> *To:* Mike Burns
> *Cc:* arin-ppml@arin.net ; Mike Burns
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 12,
sting
transfers.
Regards,
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Brian Jones
To: Mike Burns
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net ; Mike Burns
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] A Redefinition of IPv4 Need post
ARINrun-out(was:Re:Against 2013-4)
Hi Mike,
I suppo
; Mike Burns; ARIN PPML
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] A Redefinition of IPv4 Need post
ARINrun-out(was:Re:Against 2013-4)
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Steven Ryerse wrote:
> Certainly the big guys can take care of themselves but they shouldn't
> be arbitrarily excluded.
Huh? How are they exc
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Steven Ryerse wrote:
Certainly the big guys can take care of themselves but they shouldn't be
arbitrarily excluded.
Huh? How are they excluded?
I think this change should apply to the free pool as well. Obviously
hoarding isn't good but there is only so much that can b
erse; Mike Burns
Cc: ARIN PPML
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] A Redefinition of IPv4 Need post ARINrun-out
(was:Re:Against 2013-4)
>Don't know if a /12 cap would work if a big guy like tmobile or
>Microsoft applied for a larger allocation. It is fine for most organizations
>though.
ne 12, 2013 10:26 AM
To: Mike Burns
Cc: ARIN PPML
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] A Redefinition of IPv4 Need post ARINrun-out
(was:Re:Against 2013-4)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 12, 2013, at 10:21 AM, "Mike Burns" wrote:
Hi Steve, Bill, Brandon,
Thanks for your input.
Yes, I should have
