Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2017-13: Remove ARIN Review Requirements for Large IPv4 Reassignments/Reallocations

2018-03-12 Thread Hadenfeldt, Andrew
[mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf Of Jason Schiller Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 2:23 PM To: Mike Burns Cc: ARIN-PPML List Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2017-13: Remove ARIN Review Requirements for Large IPv4 Reassignments/Reallocations The point of this provision was to ensure an ISP

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2017-13: Remove ARIN Review Requirements for Large IPv4 Reassignments/Reallocations

2018-03-12 Thread Jason Schiller
018 2:07 PM > *To:* arin-ppml@arin.net > *Subject:* [arin-ppml] ARIN-2017-13: Remove ARIN Review Requirements for > Large IPv4 Reassignments/Reallocations > > > > This draft policy seems straightforward and non-controversial. IMO, it is > technically sound and promotes fair and i

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2017-13: Remove ARIN Review Requirements for Large IPv4 Reassignments/Reallocations

2018-03-12 Thread Mike Burns
] ARIN-2017-13: Remove ARIN Review Requirements for Large IPv4 Reassignments/Reallocations This draft policy seems straightforward and non-controversial. IMO, it is technically sound and promotes fair and impartial number policy. It has had support in the community. It is my intention to

[arin-ppml] ARIN-2017-13: Remove ARIN Review Requirements for Large IPv4 Reassignments/Reallocations

2018-03-12 Thread John Springer
This draft policy seems straightforward and non-controversial. IMO, it is technically sound and promotes fair and impartial number policy. It has had support in the community. It is my intention to move to advance it to Recommended Draft Policy status at our next teleconference. Now would be a go