> On Dec 20, 2023, at 12:20, Dale W. Carder wrote:
>
> Thus spake Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML (arin-ppml@arin.net) on Mon, Dec 18,
> 2023 at 12:23:31PM -0800:
>> I don’t favor striking the first paragraph. While the topics are out of
>> scope for policy, they provide a good record of the
Thus spake Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML (arin-ppml@arin.net) on Mon, Dec 18, 2023
at 12:23:31PM -0800:
> I don’t favor striking the first paragraph. While the topics are out of scope
> for policy, they provide a good record of the rationale behind this otherwise
> strange carveout. Losing the
Thus spake Martin Hannigan (hanni...@gmail.com) on Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at
05:12:49PM -0500:
> 1. Agree that Community Network, defined in Section 2, should be
> capitalized and updated throughout the document.
>
> This would appear to be an entirely editorial change.
>
> 2. Agree that the header
1. Agree that Community Network, defined in Section 2, should be
capitalized and updated throughout the document.
This would appear to be an entirely editorial change.
2. Agree that the header of Section 6.5.9 could be deleted
Does the NRPM need a Community Networks special treatment policy
I really don’t care about Capitalization or not… I’ll leave that to the lawyers
and grammarians.
Owen
> On Dec 18, 2023, at 13:15, Matthew Wilder wrote:
>
> Hi Owen,
>
> Thank you for the initial feedback.
>
> Do you have any feedback regarding the suggestion to capitalize the term
>
Hi Owen,
Thank you for the initial feedback.
Do you have any feedback regarding the suggestion to capitalize the term
"Community Networks" where it occurs in this section to reference the
Section 2 definition that exists?
Thanks,
Matthew Wilder
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 12:23 PM Owen DeLong
I don’t favor striking the first paragraph. While the topics are out of scope
for policy, they provide a good record of the rationale behind this otherwise
strange carveout. Losing the rationale would likely eventually lead to losing
track of why the policy exists, potentially resulting in loss
Hello community members,
Thank you to everyone who has provided inputs for the working group's
consideration with regard to Section 6 policies. There have been great
discussions that we as a working group (and Advisory Council more broadly)
are taking note of.
In the final Section 6 topic that
