On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 22:35 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
The only item up for (some) discussion seems to be use of Thumb2. Builds
so far have been having problems when turning on T2. For various
reasons, I'm not particularly desperate to see us build with T2. A todo
of mine is to confirm that
Jon Masters píše v St 08. 06. 2011 v 03:20 -0400:
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 01:24 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 23:35 -0400, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
hello guys
any reason to not include fake-kernel into respository ?
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 03:20 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 01:24 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 23:35 -0400, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
hello guys
any reason to not include fake-kernel into respository ?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 09:54 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
Similar package (fake-build-provides [1], [2]) is required in koji on
platforms where 32bit userspace lives with 64bit-only kernel (sparc and
s390x) so I may be worth adding
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 03:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Which gels with the ARM-state PLTs I've seen generated from builds (even
with Thumb2 enabled during build time). I still want to actually finish
testing Thumb2 build libraries used with a non-Thumb application, but I
think it's now
Quoting Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 14:29 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:04:13 +0200, Jaromir Capik wrote:
In both cases the boot gets frozen once the following line appears:
Enabling /etc/fstab swaps: [ OK ]
I tried all of the F13 beta1,
On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10:14:56 AM Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 13:29 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 09:54 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
Similar package (fake-build-provides [1], [2]) is
On 05/16/2011 03:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/16/2011 03:04 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday, May 16, 2011 08:43:17 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/16/2011 02:41 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday, May 16, 2011 08:37:43 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/12/2011 04:57 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:14 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
What do the kernel maintainers think about having a kernel subpackage
that just provides fake deps as part of the main kernel package?
Anyway. To get back to the point...there are some systems that cannot
run a stock Fedora kernel yet or
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 14:15 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:14 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
What do the kernel maintainers think about having a kernel subpackage
that just provides fake deps as part of the main kernel package?
Anyway. To get back to
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 14:59 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
I'll be posting the split out kernel-noarch spec this week, which should
rectify building kernel-doc and kernel-headers, without needing to go
through the half-hearted rigamarole to do it now.
Great! Also +1 to considering the fake deps
11 matches
Mail list logo
