Bootstrapping of GHC is now completed for both armv7hl and armv5tel.
armv7hl packages is in stage4 since a month back.
mock built amv5tel packages can be found at
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/hno/armv5tel/fedora-15/
ghc
hscolour
ghc-rpm-macros
redhat-rpm-config
built from curr
Ho Jon,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 22:09 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>> So ive done some thinking, and talked with some of the stakeholders.
>> Ive come to the conclusion that we should skip f16 and shoot straight
>> for rawhide. two reasons for
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:49 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> So what's the status of this? Are we using the F-15 as the external
> repo base for building F-17? When is it going to happen? My
> understanding is we have enough of both arches built that we can start
> this rolling. It would be good to s
So Moji has burned through all of the armv5tel builds at least once[0];
we have 4092 successful builds and 915 error builds at this point. Jon
and Paul are pulling in some lovingly hand-crafted builds done on the
weekend (thanks tinker915 and Henrick) and working through the error'd
builds -- any h
> - compare the armv5tel and armv7hl package sets again
Do we need another pretty chart? ;-)
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Chris Tyler wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:49 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> So what's the status of this? Are we using the F-15 as the external
>> repo base for building F-17? When is it going to happen? My
>> understanding is we have enough of both arches bui
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Chris Tyler wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:49 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> So what's the status of this? Are we using the F-15 as the external
>>> repo base for building F-17? When is it going to hap
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:53 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> - compare the armv5tel and armv7hl package sets again
>
> Do we need another pretty chart? ;-)
yes please
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 19:17 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Chris Tyler wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:49 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> So what's the status of this? Are we using the F-15 as the external
> >> repo base for building F-17? When is it going to
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 13:53 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > - compare the armv5tel and armv7hl package sets again
>
> Do we need another pretty chart? ;-)
Ideally, crontab'd!
-Chris
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Chris Tyler wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 19:17 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Chris Tyler wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:49 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >> So what's the status of this? Are we using the F-15 as the exte
> Ideally, crontab'd!
Heh. The trick is finding a machine that has both access to the repos
*and* access to a web server, and is powerful enough to run the script
in a reasonable time.
But I'll see what I can do ;-)
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedo
> >> - compare the armv5tel and armv7hl package sets again
> >
> > Do we need another pretty chart? ;-)
>
> yes please
Is there a suitable rsync target we can use to get a local copy of the
appropriate files?
Note: the answer to that partly depends on what kinds of comparisons
you're intereste
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 14:41 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Ideally, crontab'd!
>
> Heh. The trick is finding a machine that has both access to the repos
> *and* access to a web server, and is powerful enough to run the script
> in a reasonable time.
>
> But I'll see what I can do ;-)
We can host
> We can host on Australia -- send me an ssh public key for access.
Will do. What sort of information do we want this new chart to convey?
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
On 10/25/2011 11:52 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> We can host on Australia -- send me an ssh public key for access.
>
> Will do. What sort of information do we want this new chart to convey?
Packages only in armv7hl build (latest version)
Packages only in armv5tel build (latest version)
Changes only
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 14:52 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > We can host on Australia -- send me an ssh public key for access.
>
> Will do. What sort of information do we want this new chart to convey?
I think we need to see if the package sets are congruent, so a display
of the differences between
Plan was to release a good enough F15 but absolutely to do some kind of release
(just cap when we will move on to keep momentum - a couple more weeks and we
need to be focused on rawhide). It's F16 we are wanting to skip in order to
focus on rawhide by the new year.
--
Sent from my phone - mes
> >> - compare the armv5tel and armv7hl package sets again
> >
> > Do we need another pretty chart? ;-)
>
> yes please
http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html
Cool!
What is the plan for reconciling the differences?
A few packages stand out as being particularly concerning:
gcc: There are patches in the armv7hl build that affect volatile
bitfields a
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 02:37 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
> There will be an outage starting at 2011-10-25 14:00 UTC, which will
> last approximately 4 hours. (Services will be restored incrementally,
> with the x86_64 hosts coming up first, followed by the ARM builders).
>
> To convert UTC to your lo
21 matches
Mail list logo
