Re: [fedora-arm] Patching aarch64 support into Fedora

2013-03-05 Thread Al Stone
On 03/05/2013 11:44 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: [snip..] Red Hat's Al Stone has written a script which automatically generates patches for each package that needs it (And updates its spec file). After a complete run we can say that ~1850 packages need such a patch. The number may be larger, but

Re: [fedora-arm] Patching aarch64 support into Fedora

2013-03-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote: Hi everybody, Fedora 19 has many of the enablers for native aarch64 in core packages such as glibc and gcc. Many more packages would compile if config.guess and config.sub recognized aarch64 as a valid architecture, but

[fedora-arm] Allwinner A1x support

2013-03-05 Thread Ajith Kumar
Hello, Referring to http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2013-February/005377.html , is there any A10S support coming up. I got an A10S Donglehttp://www.wits-tech.com/pagesen/tablets.jspfrom WITS Technology, that boots into Android, very low cost US$ 25. The PCB photographs are

[fedora-arm] Allwinner A10S support

2013-03-05 Thread Ajith Kumar
Hello, Referring to http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2013-February/005377.html , is there any A10S support coming up. I got an A10S Donglehttp://www.wits-tech.com/pagesen/tablets.jspfrom WITS Technology, that boots into Android, very low cost US$ 25. The PCB photographs are

Re: [fedora-arm] Allwinner A10S support

2013-03-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/05/2013 10:43 AM, Ajith Kumar wrote: Hello, Referring to http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2013-February/005377.html , is there any A10S support coming up. I got an A10S Dongle http://www.wits-tech.com/pagesen/tablets.jsp from WITS Technology, that boots into

[fedora-arm] Daily Koji Compare Stats

2013-03-05 Thread jon . chiappetta
Tue Mar 5 08:05:01 EST 2013 f19 : arm vs PA Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote | Missing | -- 10465 |0 | 690 |1 |

[fedora-arm] Unable to clone ARMv8 rootfs

2013-03-05 Thread Radha Mohan
Hi, I've been trying to clone the ARMv8 rootfs but do not have success. $ git clone http://fedorapeople.org/groups/armv8/rootfs.git Initialized empty Git repository in /home/rchintakuntla/fedora/rootfs/.git/ error: Unable to get pack file

[fedora-arm] 3.8.x. kernel for F-18/17

2013-03-05 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, We're getting close to pushing a proper updates build for the F-18/17 releases to rebase them to kernel 3.8.x. I have done a scratch build of 3.8.2-202 [1] and I would like some wider testing especially on armv5tel devices. A quick overview of the status of this kernel on the various

Re: [fedora-arm] Patching aarch64 support into Fedora

2013-03-05 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:44:16PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: 1. Do nothing, trip over this issue at least 1850 times during bootstrap. 2. Mail all package owners asking for action. How about posting the list and the suggested action to correct it to fedora-devel, as an initial pass? --

Re: [fedora-arm] 3.8.x. kernel for F-18/17

2013-03-05 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 03/05/2013 12:37 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: * Trimslice - DTS tested working with uboot v2012.04-1.01 [3] (the one with half the RAM) Boots okay with a Fedora 18 rootfs, but there is an issue: Trying to run mock build results in an out of memory error. This works fine with the 3.7 series.

Re: [fedora-arm] 3.8.x. kernel for F-18/17

2013-03-05 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 03/05/2013 02:04 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 03/05/2013 12:37 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: * Trimslice - DTS tested working with uboot v2012.04-1.01 [3] (the one with half the RAM) Boots okay with a Fedora 18 rootfs, but there is an issue: Trying to run mock build results in an out of

Re: [fedora-arm] 3.8.x. kernel for F-18/17

2013-03-05 Thread rihowa...@gmail.com
On Mar 5, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi All, We're getting close to pushing a proper updates build for the F-18/17 releases to rebase them to kernel 3.8.x. I have done a scratch build of 3.8.2-202 [1] and I would like some wider testing especially on armv5tel devices. I