Re: [fedora-arm] PogoPlug E02 -- 25 bucks.

2011-12-14 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2011-12-14 klockan 09:46 -0500 skrev omall...@msu.edu: Buy.com has the pogoplug P21 for 28 dollars with free shipping. http://www.buy.com/prod/pogoplug-file-sharing-solution-black/221688297.html This does have the dual core oxnas chip in it. As I said these devices currently run linux

Re: [fedora-arm] PogoPlug E02 -- 25 bucks.

2011-12-12 Thread Henrik Nordström
mån 2011-12-12 klockan 11:28 -0500 skrev omall...@msu.edu: The pogoplugs depending on the version, can ship with an oxnas armv6 processor though which is different then the guru/ultra plugs. Supposedly there are some proprietary driver issues, according to the archlinux site. I haven

Re: [fedora-arm] FORTIFY_SOURCE

2011-11-18 Thread Henrik Nordström
fre 2011-11-18 klockan 00:30 -0500 skrev Jon Masters: There was some dialog on IRC recently about compile flags. As near as I can see it, we ought to be consistent in r-r-c between v5 and v7. Did I miss something in particular? Just tying up some loose ends here. That was about most of

Re: [fedora-arm] FORTIFY_SOURCE

2011-11-18 Thread Henrik Nordström
fre 2011-11-18 klockan 15:55 -0500 skrev Jon Masters: Thanks for the clarification. I guess we were always going to have one or two of these situations. Let's just hope not too many packages will affect us when we do the Koji build. The armv5tel rebuild have already hit those. Regards Henrik

Re: [fedora-arm] GCC PR #50521

2011-11-09 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2011-11-09 klockan 10:05 + skrev Gordan Bobic: Speaking of alignment, armv5 has been in need of a GCC option to force 4-byte alignment of all arrays (including char[] arrays) and structs since forever. Arguably, it should be on by default on arm. But I guess that is unrelated

Re: [fedora-arm] all my pretty charts for Fedora/ARM

2011-11-09 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2011-11-09 klockan 12:57 -0500 skrev DJ Delorie: http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv7hl-repoclosure.html Remaining dependencies on stage3 RPMs Actually it's not. It's a report of missing dependencies in stage4. Many packages build without all their runtime dependencies, and we

Re: [fedora-arm] all my pretty charts for Fedora/ARM

2011-11-09 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2011-11-09 klockan 18:17 -0500 skrev DJ Delorie: gdm-3.0.0 failed due to out of disk space Requed go get correct logs. Was something else if actually fails on but logs got overwritten in mass rebuild of failed packages. Regards Henrik ___ arm

Re: [fedora-arm] all my pretty charts for Fedora/ARM

2011-11-09 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2011-11-09 klockan 18:09 -0500 skrev DJ Delorie: http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv7hl-repoclosure.html Remaining dependencies on stage3 RPMs Actually it's not. It's a report of missing dependencies in stage4. I've updated the script to check with and without stage3,

Re: [fedora-arm] VFAD Monday for armv5tel/armv7hl reconcilliation and prep for koji startup

2011-11-08 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2011-11-08 klockan 16:59 -0500 skrev Chris Tyler: I propose a VFAD to clean up and reconcile armv5tel/armv7hl pre-koji package sets and prep for koji startup: When: Nov 14 - 11:00 am EST / 8:00 am PST / 15:00 UTC where:#fedora-arm What: armv5tel-armv7hl package set

Re: [fedora-arm] Another repository verification check that would be useful

2011-11-02 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2011-10-26 klockan 23:56 +0100 skrev Daniel Drake: perl-Coro built in armv7hl stage3 but failed in stage4, and hence is only present in stage3. specfile now patched and rebuilt on armv7hl. Failed due to ucontext not working on ARM and fedora patched it to force the use of ucontext when asm

Re: [fedora-arm] qt-4.7.4-3.fc15.armv5tel for moji

2011-11-02 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2011-11-02 klockan 03:44 -0500 skrev Rex Dieter: If that problem is ongoing, consider disabling patch105 (qt-everywhere- opensource-src-4.7.1-webkit_debug_javascriptcore.patch) on arm, which should help a bunch. More an issue of making sure builders are properly configured I think. It

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 16

2011-10-29 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2011-10-26 klockan 13:34 -0400 skrev omall...@msu.edu: My concerns still are we need to make sure the current patches are getting upstream to f16+ and rawhide. And we are actively working on that together with mainline package maintainers. The goal is even to get them into F15+ with as

[fedora-arm] ghc bootstrapped for armv5tel (and armv7hl earlier)

2011-10-25 Thread Henrik Nordström
Bootstrapping of GHC is now completed for both armv7hl and armv5tel. armv7hl packages is in stage4 since a month back. mock built amv5tel packages can be found at http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/hno/armv5tel/fedora-15/ ghc hscolour ghc-rpm-macros redhat-rpm-config built from

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 16

2011-10-20 Thread Henrik Nordström
ttor 2011-10-20 klockan 17:30 +0100 skrev Peter Robinson: How many of these have been submitted upstream? I suspect very few, there's only about 100 odd there so it shouldn't take long to get them upstreamed. It's not really that many. A very large group of those are the ghc related ones

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 16

2011-10-19 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2011-10-18 klockan 22:09 -0500 skrev Dennis Gilmore: So ive done some thinking, and talked with some of the stakeholders. Ive come to the conclusion that we should skip f16 and shoot straight for rawhide. +1 from me. It's already late to start on F16. F17 is a more realistic goal.

Re: [fedora-arm] arv7hl SRPM status updates

2011-10-13 Thread Henrik Nordström
tor 2011-10-13 klockan 15:57 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordström: tor 2011-10-13 klockan 02:25 -0400 skrev Jon Masters: Henrik, what do you think? Do we have enough of these packages under control that a VFAD is overkill? Or is there benefit in having one? I would love to get to next week

[fedora-arm] U-Boot?

2011-10-13 Thread Henrik Nordström
Been a rather intense discussion regarding U-Boot on IRC today, and time for some reflections and a little decision to be taken. In stage3 we do have an u-boot package which provides uboot images for pandaboard, trimslice, beagleboard and some more. The pandaboard requires u-boot on the boot

Re: [fedora-arm] armv5tel gcc F15 bootstrap complete

2011-10-03 Thread Henrik Nordström
mån 2011-10-03 klockan 09:32 +0100 skrev Daniel Drake: Hi, binutils (now from F15 mainline), cloog, gcc and libtool all available from: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/for-f15-arm/ Excellent! Please import into main repo Is there any changes in any of the srpms compared to mainline? Whats

Re: [fedora-arm] armv5tel F15 toolchain update

2011-10-01 Thread Henrik Nordström
lör 2011-10-01 klockan 10:46 +0100 skrev Daniel Drake: Great. I'm not surprised that its needed. We will put the same version into armv5 stage3 then we'll be in sync on that. Just curious, how did you identify that what you faced is the same issue? By comparing the ld stacktrace which

Re: [fedora-arm] armv5tel F15 toolchain update

2011-10-01 Thread Henrik Nordström
lör 2011-10-01 klockan 15:01 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordström: Brendan is working on getting them rebased to 4.6.1-9 and identifying and documenting what changes is there. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora15_HardFP_Bootstrap_package_status#gcc More work remains to clean

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 - ARM v5 and v7 plan of attack

2011-09-26 Thread Henrik Nordström
sön 2011-09-25 klockan 21:59 -0400 skrev Chris Tyler: On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 00:32 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote: Also, do our hacked rpm yum versions work for both arch versions currently? If not then that should be fixed as soon as possible to allow builders to build for both targets

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 - ARM v5 and v7 plan of attack

2011-09-25 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2011-09-21 klockan 16:17 -0400 skrev Jon Masters: We will continue to build ARMv7 packages in the bootstrap effort. We will use GA packages as we have done. Those packages that fail to build with the GA sources will be built using updated sources. KDE and other stacks on a case-by-case

Re: [fedora-arm] LLVM

2011-09-24 Thread Henrik Nordström
lör 2011-09-24 klockan 23:12 +0100 skrev Richard W.M. Jones: On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 01:29:35PM -0400, Jonathan Masters wrote: llvm (needs ocaml) I don't know exactly what the OCaml dep is here, but I'll just say that (a) [thanks to DJ Delorie] I pushed out a new ocaml package in Rawhide

Re: [fedora-arm] LLVM

2011-09-23 Thread Henrik Nordström
fre 2011-09-23 klockan 11:36 -0400 skrev Jon Masters: Hey aph, Copying Fedora ARM public mailing list. See also #fedora-arm on Freenode if you'd like to swing by and talk about Java packages :) I need some advice. We're 13 packages shy of a minimal package set for F15 (if we exclude

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 - ARM v5 and v7 plan of attack

2011-09-22 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2011-09-21 klockan 15:26 -0700 skrev Brendan Conoboy: On 09/21/2011 01:59 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote: We will hold a review session tomorrow (Thursday September 22) on IRC that will be announced as a VFAD.[snip] At what time? Per Chris Tyler's recent email ([fedora-arm] Triage

[fedora-arm] armv7hl distro bootstrap updates

2011-09-20 Thread Henrik Nordström
Background for those who haven't seen the discussion on IRC. There is a ongoing debate if the F15 effort should initially target to build F15 GA (original release) or F15 with current updates. Here is my views. In the stage4 distribution bootstrap we are seeing an annoyingly high rate of FTBFS

Re: [fedora-arm] Thumb mode IT instruction requirements and -mimplicit-it assembler flag

2011-09-19 Thread Henrik Nordström
mån 2011-09-19 klockan 03:13 -0400 skrev Jonathan Masters: Right. I wrote that then realized I was thinking rpmbuild not mock. I blame it on being pulled in other directions while working on the weekend ;) So anyway, we should fix this in the am by getting the stage4 macros changed accordingly

Re: [fedora-arm] Thumb mode IT instruction requirements and -mimplicit-it assembler flag

2011-09-18 Thread Henrik Nordström
sön 2011-09-18 klockan 15:49 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordström: No, it's on every package. Or at least was before the stage3 trim. Need to double check current status (nothing should have changed, but..) Just verified. The default compiler flags are still the same after stage3 was trimmed: mock

Re: [fedora-arm] Updated F15 bootstrap image for TrimSlice

2011-09-18 Thread Henrik Nordström
Is there any other significant difference from the previously published rootfs other than that this is easier to boot on the trimslice as tegra kernel uboot images are already prepared and includes the NFS client tools? sön 2011-09-18 klockan 05:44 -0400 skrev Jon Masters: Folks, Updates

[fedora-arm] Thumb mode IT instruction requirements and -mimplicit-it assembler flag

2011-09-17 Thread Henrik Nordström
The armv7 distro bootstrap have run into a number of packages failing to compile in Thumb mode (default enabled in rpmrc) failing on ARM assembly parts with conditional branch instructions. In thumb mode one apparently need to use the IT instruction to hint to the CPU about the conditions of

[fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp status update

2011-09-16 Thread Henrik Nordström
THe hardfp bootstrap is progressing quite well, now at the stage of resolving a fairly long list of build failures and circular package dependencies. The brute force dependency resolution have now come to an end, and manual action is required to continue building packages. It's quite amasing how

Re: [fedora-arm] Include prelink in fedora arm?

2011-09-09 Thread Henrik Nordström
tor 2011-09-08 klockan 12:31 +0100 skrev Peter Robinson: I agree. Most of the discussion in this thread seems to be based upon opinion not raw facts. Alot of the prelink stuff seems to come down to certain preferences or use case. I think we should follow upstream, its not like it can't be

[fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp status update notes

2011-09-09 Thread Henrik Nordström
. That is the actual upstream, not just Fedora bugzilla. Regards Henrik Nordström ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

Re: [fedora-arm] Slow USB storage on A9 processors

2011-09-09 Thread Henrik Nordström
fre 2011-09-09 klockan 12:36 +0100 skrev Peter Robinson: I know it was discussed a while ago how the USB storage on PandaBoards was slow, not sure what the resolution was but saw this article on LWN that looks like our problem there for those that might not have seen the post elsewhere and

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp status update notes

2011-09-09 Thread Henrik Nordström
fre 2011-09-09 klockan 16:08 -0400 skrev Jonathan Masters: Only thing I would add is that we had been just adding arm1 (no period) to NV*R* (release bit). I don't object rootfs your suggestion but we should standardize. Opinions? To follow sane naming guidelines there need to be a period at

Re: [fedora-arm] TrimSlice

2011-09-05 Thread Henrik Nordström
sön 2011-09-04 klockan 21:12 +0200 skrev Guillaume FORTAINE: Hello, For your information : http://www.trimslice.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=51t=280 To quote : Fedora Linux is actively being ported to the TrimSlice, with several developers using TrimSlice PRO for building. Yes, I

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora on ARM

2011-01-23 Thread Henrik Nordström
fre 2011-01-21 klockan 23:00 +0800 skrev Misha Shnurapet: I have a question. What does it mean for Fedora? That there should get a bigger momentum around Linux on ARM in general, including Fedora, and that the current task of getting the Fedora ARM up to date is an important enabler for Fedora

Re: [fedora-arm] Updated cross binutils and gcc patches against rawhide

2010-12-23 Thread Henrik Nordström
tor 2010-12-23 klockan 18:54 +0530 skrev tuxdna: If we can do that, then building packages for ARM would be faster I guess. ( I am not aware of various issues with buidling RPMs using cross compilers. ) Semi-cross builds is reasonable. That is an ARM build host using distcc to hosts of

Re: [fedora-arm] where to look for fedora cross toolchain SRPMS

2010-12-22 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2010-12-22 klockan 14:36 + skrev Andy Green: I kind of hoped the originators of the cross stuff would uplevel to it and keep doing what they had been doing, but it seems that it's not their focus right now. My understanding is that the one who built the old cross toolchain is no

Re: [fedora-arm] ARMv7 rootfs/repository?

2010-12-22 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2010-12-22 klockan 11:15 -0500 skrev Chris Tyler: It's not a Fedora infrastructure issue, the ABIs are incompatible. I wish you could mix'n'match but that doesn't look possible. Should be possible I think using multilib techniques. This assuming a hardfp kernel can run softfp bnaries. If

Re: [fedora-arm] rootfs - Packages yet to be built for dist-f13 on arm-koji

2010-12-16 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2010-12-14 klockan 13:57 -0600 skrev Dennis Gilmore: you have to use an arm machine to do it. since the post install scripts wont work on a non arm machine. Note: qemu-system-arm is a suitable arm machine if you have trouble running it on actual arm hardware. Regards Henrik

Re: [fedora-arm] Support for ARMv7, hardware math

2010-12-04 Thread Henrik Nordström
lör 2010-12-04 klockan 07:38 -0500 skrev Jeff Voskamp: I'd be happy with any updated to F12 since I see some packages have been re-built for that. the F12 repository on the arm koji seems a bit messed up if you ask me. Many of the packages have an fc13 release tag in their rpm name which I

Re: [fedora-arm] Flashing Fedora-12 onto a SheevaPlug?

2010-11-19 Thread Henrik Nordström
tor 2010-11-18 klockan 21:58 -0500 skrev Derek Atkins: Luckily my sheeva is still running its original config. uboot is working (albeit with the default version): If you have uboot working and access to it then reflashing is better done from there than using JTAG. You can use uboot to load

Re: [fedora-arm] Augen {smart|net}book creation ... can it run Fedora ARM?

2010-09-16 Thread Henrik Nordström
tor 2010-09-16 klockan 07:53 +0100 skrev pbrobin...@gmail.com: I've been meaning to ask similar questions about the Tegra 2 ARM A9 processor from Nvidia. I presume they use their own GPU technology so while they're not open source GPU kernel drivers generally I wondered whether nouveau would

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora XO 1.5 on Android tablets

2010-09-03 Thread Henrik Nordström
lör 2010-09-04 klockan 00:36 +0530 skrev Narendra Sisodiya: I was talking about generics steps and existing work. It's hard to speak about generic steps here. But afaik no efforts have been put into making a Fedora ARM Tablet edition if that is what you wonder. But Fedora in general do

Re: [fedora-arm] Guruplug | uaputl fail

2010-08-13 Thread Henrik Nordström
fre 2010-08-13 klockan 23:24 +0200 skrev Bernhard Schuster: Anyone any idea? Any ideas hints, whatever.. I just do not know where to search start searching beyond google which only spits my last mail within the mail archieve at me... No ideas here other than to try another kernel. But not a

Re: [fedora-arm] uaputl

2010-07-28 Thread Henrik Nordström
mån 2010-07-26 klockan 11:34 +0200 skrev Bernhard Schuster: Please can anyone provide me the uaputl binary? I accidently erase the whole nand and forgot to backup uaputl and I can not find it anywhere at plugcomputer nor on the browsable net. You can find the full tar of the original root fs

Re: [fedora-arm] Mybook World, old edition

2010-07-25 Thread Henrik Nordström
sön 2010-07-25 klockan 12:57 +0200 skrev Dan Horák: Fedora glibc required kernel at least 2.6.18 until this Wednesday, now it requires 2.6.32, the minimum kernel version defines how much compatibility stuff is included into glibc Ok. So I'll either have to update kernel to at least 2.6.18, or