hey everyone,
So ive done some thinking, and talked with some of the stakeholders.
Ive come to the conclusion that we should skip f16 and shoot straight
for rawhide. two reasons for this. one to become a primary arch at some
point we need to be caught up and doing releases at the same time. my
lon
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 22:09 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> So ive done some thinking, and talked with some of the stakeholders.
> Ive come to the conclusion that we should skip f16 and shoot straight
> for rawhide. two reasons for this. one to become a primary arch at some
> point we need to be ca
tis 2011-10-18 klockan 22:09 -0500 skrev Dennis Gilmore:
> So ive done some thinking, and talked with some of the stakeholders.
> Ive come to the conclusion that we should skip f16 and shoot straight
> for rawhide.
+1 from me. It's already late to start on F16. F17 is a more realistic
goal.
Rela
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> So ive done some thinking, and talked with some of the stakeholders.
> Ive come to the conclusion that we should skip f16 and shoot straight
> for rawhide. two reasons for this. one to become a primary arch at some
> point we need to be caug
2011/10/19 Henrik Nordström :
> tis 2011-10-18 klockan 22:09 -0500 skrev Dennis Gilmore:
>
>> So ive done some thinking, and talked with some of the stakeholders.
>> Ive come to the conclusion that we should skip f16 and shoot straight
>> for rawhide.
>
> +1 from me. It's already late to start on F
I thought we should have skipped F15, but I do agree we are probably
going to have to skip one release. Even if say armv5 does 16 and armv7
does 17 then a unified 18.
Is there a way to check all the arm source repositories for changes
that have been made to verify they made it into the mainl
> I thought we should have skipped F15,
Back when I started, F16 was just a glimmer, and deemed too much of a
moving target. V5tel was still working on F13 and so targetting F15
was, at that point, already skipping a release.
> Is there a way to check all the arm source repositories for changes
Quoting DJ Delorie :
>
>> I thought we should have skipped F15,
>
> Back when I started, F16 was just a glimmer, and deemed too much of a
> moving target. V5tel was still working on F13 and so targetting F15
> was, at that point, already skipping a release
It is all good. F17 is just a glimmer r
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:49 PM, wrote:
> Quoting DJ Delorie :
>
>>
>>> I thought we should have skipped F15,
>>
>> Back when I started, F16 was just a glimmer, and deemed too much of a
>> moving target. V5tel was still working on F13 and so targetting F15
>> was, at that point, already skipping
ttor 2011-10-20 klockan 17:30 +0100 skrev Peter Robinson:
> > How many of these have been submitted upstream?
>
> I suspect very few, there's only about 100 odd there so it shouldn't
> take long to get them upstreamed.
It's not really that many. A very large group of those are the ghc
related on
On 10/20/2011 08:14 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> ttor 2011-10-20 klockan 17:30 +0100 skrev Peter Robinson:
>
>>> How many of these have been submitted upstream?
>>
>> I suspect very few, there's only about 100 odd there so it shouldn't
>> take long to get them upstreamed.
>
> java-1.5.0-gcj
>
Ho Jon,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 22:09 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>> So ive done some thinking, and talked with some of the stakeholders.
>> Ive come to the conclusion that we should skip f16 and shoot straight
>> for rawhide. two reasons for
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:49 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> So what's the status of this? Are we using the F-15 as the external
> repo base for building F-17? When is it going to happen? My
> understanding is we have enough of both arches built that we can start
> this rolling. It would be good to s
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Chris Tyler wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:49 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> So what's the status of this? Are we using the F-15 as the external
>> repo base for building F-17? When is it going to happen? My
>> understanding is we have enough of both arches bui
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Chris Tyler wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:49 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> So what's the status of this? Are we using the F-15 as the external
>>> repo base for building F-17? When is it going to hap
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 19:17 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Chris Tyler wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:49 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> So what's the status of this? Are we using the F-15 as the external
> >> repo base for building F-17? When is it going to
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Chris Tyler wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 19:17 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Chris Tyler wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:49 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >> So what's the status of this? Are we using the F-15 as the exte
phone - message formatted and/or shortened accordingly.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Robinson [pbrobin...@gmail.com]
Received: Tuesday, 25 Oct 2011, 11:17
To: Chris Tyler [ch...@tylers.info]
CC: Fedora ARM secondary architecture list [arm@lists.fedoraproject.org]
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] F
: Peter Robinson [pbrobin...@gmail.com]
> Received: Tuesday, 25 Oct 2011, 11:17
> To: Chris Tyler [ch...@tylers.info]
> CC: Fedora ARM secondary architecture list [arm@lists.fedoraproject.org]
> Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 16
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Chri
On 10/26/2011 10:34 AM, omall...@msu.edu wrote:
> Can we get away with taking a snapshot of the F15 base and F15 Updates
> trees, and merge them and call that F15 base?
Keeping F15 updates spinning during the F17 work is a sensible thing to
do as we could really use a stable ARM Fedora release to
ons 2011-10-26 klockan 13:34 -0400 skrev omall...@msu.edu:
> My concerns still are we need to make sure the current patches are
> getting upstream to f16+ and rawhide.
And we are actively working on that together with mainline package
maintainers. The goal is even to get them into F15+ with as
21 matches
Mail list logo
