http://rhombus-tech.net/riscv/shakti/m_class/pinouts/
added the smartphone/tablet scenario, added DDR3, SYS and POWER
pins total comes to 290! that's around 18x18 on a side, maybe
19x19 to make space for routing, which in a BGA form-factor @ 0.8mm
pitch would be a 15x15mm package!
0.8mm
could i ask people for some help, here?
http://rhombus-tech.net/riscv/shakti/m_class/pinouts/
http://rhombus-tech.net/riscv/shakti/m_class/pinouts.py
i'm looking for scenarios, to be added to the above, as "tests" of the
SoC multiplexing pinouts. it's a mobile-class, 32-bit-wire
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 04:25:36AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 4:26 PM, wrote:
> > https://www.sifive.com/products/risc-v-core-ip/u54-mc/
> >
> > What can we expect from this cpu?
> > There is no gpu, you cannot get a board which
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f6d5/e754da444b7ede6e4eeaf0d61e8cbb82ade9.pdf
https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.02318
so, the compression and something called macro-op fusion results in a
significant reduction in code size that happens also to result in less
cache usage and also faster execution time.
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Bill Kontos wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> wrote:
>
>> the initial plan is to use the main processor
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> the initial plan is to use the main processor with some basic SIMD
> vector-processing instructions, which in quad-core would be more than
> adequate.
>
> bear in mind this is - preliminarily - to be around
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> ---
> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>
> RISC-V is *significantly* less power-hungry, performance/watt. also,
> those 3 watts will include a Monster GPU, which will
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Bill Kontos wrote:
> 600mW sound like an aweful little for desktop use. I can't fathom
> javascript loading speeds in such a package. For reference my phone
> has
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> it's the "mobile" class. get this: in 28nm they're looking at 600mW
> power consumption for the m-class :)
>
600mW sound like an aweful little for desktop use. I can't fathom
javascript loading speeds in