Dear armchairs,
charitable organisations claim that paying for blood donations could worsen the
situation because it mostly attracts people from high risk groups (junkies etc.)and
those who donate blood are people with a low risk of "poor blood quality". But
otherwise there is a lack
, or a deed for any real property
worth more than X, and get put on a "unlikely bum" list?
Daniel
- Original Message -
From: "Hentrich, Steffen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, February 23, 2004 11:06 am
Subject: paying for blood donations
> Dear armchairs,
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, February 23, 2004 11:06 am
Subject: paying for blood donations
> Dear armchairs,
>
> charitable organisations claim that paying for blood donations
> could worsen the situation because it mostly attracts people from
> high risk groups (junkie
On 2004-02-23, Dan Lewis uttered:
>While that may add a barrier to donating -- many people won't want to
>do a good deed if it requires such an invasion of privacy -- why not
>treat giving blood as any other donation, and make it a tax deduction
>worth $X?
Around these parts, blood donations are
y 23, 2004 8:09 pm
Subject: Re: paying for blood donations
> While that may add a barrier to donating -- many people won't want
> to do a
> good deed if it requires such an invasion of privacy -- why not treat
> giving blood as any other donation, and make it a tax deduction worth
>
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Of course, there may be differences between
blood and semen.
Speaking from experience, one of these donation
processes is also much more pleasant than the other.
Cheers,
Osborne
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only th
We often have emergencies requiring large amounts of blood, but I can't
recall the last emergency requiring large amounts of semen.
David
In a message dated 2/24/04 2:29:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Of course, there may be differences between
>blood and semen.
