Hello,
On slackware-current I can not compile the kernel on my raspberry Pi
anymore. Until and including
Mon Jun 18 08:07:25 UTC 2012 changes in the slackware-current repository
I recompiled the kernel several times with succes. With the changes that
were made on Thu Jul 5 07:56:34 UTC 2012 i
Hello!
Before I start doing something with this device and probably ruin it I
have a question.
Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
-
Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
In my experience, yes. You may have to update the uboot in it so it will
boot off USB device. That is what I had to do to get my dockstar running
On Jul 10, 2012 1:58 PM, "Gregg Levine" wrote:
> Hello!
> Before I start doing something with this device and probably ruin it I
> have a question.
>
On 10 July 2012 19:58, Gregg Levine wrote:
> Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
adding support".
--
Ottavio
___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.a
> > Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
>
> I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
> adding support".
Not to answer *that* question I wouldn't.
The dockstar is supported in the way that a kernel is supplied that runs
on that device.
Much t
The Dockstar has an identical processor ("Kirkwood") to the
SheevaPlug, which is supported.
It takes some extra effort to "hack" the bootloader on the Dockstar,
but once I had that sorted, running Slackware on my Dockstar was no
problem.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
> He
> Until and including
> Mon Jun 18 08:07:25 UTC 2012 changes in the slackware-current repository I
If you're using -current you need to keep up to date -- this date is of an
old batch.
The latest batch has a toolchain upgrade and lots of other changes.
__
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Stuart Winter wrote:
>
>> > Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
>>
>> I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
>> adding support".
>
> Not to answer *that* question I wouldn't.
>
> The dockstar is supported in t
No hardware clock, have to use ntp to sync the time. This is a problem if
it is not connected to the "internet"
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Stuart Winter
> wrote:
> >
> >> > Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port
> Hello!
> Okay, what about them bothers you?
I always think about using the machines as either 'desktops' or build
machines, so anything that is of low spec doesn't interest me at all -
especially when there are better machines out there.
The dockstar has no RTC and only 128MB RAM. IMO if you w
> > Until and including
> > Mon Jun 18 08:07:25 UTC 2012 changes in the slackware-current repository I
>
> If you're using -current you need to keep up to date -- this date is of an
> old batch.
>
> The latest batch has a toolchain upgrade and lots of other changes.
Aha I misread your post!
This
On 7/10/2012 13:09, Stuart Winter wrote:
> so anything that is of low spec doesn't interest me at all -
> especially when there are better machines out there.
The Dockstar is such a cute form factor, though. Especially when you
put one of the 2.5" drives in it. But you're right, only 128MB is
pa
> >
> > The latest batch has a toolchain upgrade and lots of other changes.
>
> Aha I misread your post!
>
> This is common for Fedora, apparently:
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2012-March/003001.html
>
> Have a dig around and see whether there's a fix for it that Fedora have
>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:16 PM, David Madden wrote:
> On 7/10/2012 13:09, Stuart Winter wrote:
>> so anything that is of low spec doesn't interest me at all -
>> especially when there are better machines out there.
>
> The Dockstar is such a cute form factor, though. Especially when you
> put on
On 07/10/2012 03:50 PM, Stuart Winter wrote:
Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
adding support".
Not to answer *that* question I wouldn't.
The dockstar is supported in the way that a kernel is suppl
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Rich wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 03:50 PM, Stuart Winter wrote:
Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
>>>
>>> I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
>>> adding support".
>>
>> Not to answer *that* question
On 10.07.2012 23:54, Stuart Winter wrote:
The latest batch has a toolchain upgrade and lots of other changes.
Aha I misread your post!
This is common for Fedora, apparently:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2012-March/003001.html
Have a dig around and see whether there's a fix for
On 11.07.2012 08:21, Sorin Mitrica wrote:
On 10.07.2012 23:54, Stuart Winter wrote:
The latest batch has a toolchain upgrade and lots of other changes.
Aha I misread your post!
This is common for Fedora, apparently:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2012-March/003001.html
Have a d
18 matches
Mail list logo
