"If you issue the submit - and have not populated 179 - and then do a set
fields in a filter say field-179-copy = $179$, I expect you will find a null on
field-179-copy. (I have not done this.)"
Well, I think you should. I think you'll be surprised with the results.
I never said that field 179
Hi Scott,
I am not wrong. If you issue the submit - and have not populated 179 - and
then do a set fields in a filter say field-179-copy = $179$, I expect you
will find a null on field-179-copy. (I have not done this.)
Neither 1 not 179 require "a completed commit to the db". They are se
Brad,When your Creating the Service Request Defination we have mapping there we
have to enter the quuestions and mapped occurding to that it will displays in
the notes field in the Incident Management--Sanjeeva Naidu G9731802802On Mon,
06 Dec 2010 19:14:46 , Bradley Murphy
All,
I believe the confusion surrounding field ID 179 is this:
Prior to ARS 6.3, if you wanted to use a GUID for creating parent/child
relationships, the GUID had to be created using the Application-Generate-GUID
process (there was no field Id 179).
In ARS 6.3, Remedy introduced field ID 179. T
The GUID field has always (since its invention) been automatically populated
ON SUBMIT - that is when all workflow has fired and the record is being
written to the database - much like field 1.
If you need it ahead of that (in filters or ALs) then you need to populate
it.
Cheers
Ben Cher
The GUID isn't automatically populated in earlier versions of ARS (I believe
7.5 is the first version which does). For lower versions you need to use a
run process as you have been doing. Sounds like there's either a
documentation bug or you're looking at a newer help file.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at
**
Check your web logs for redirects. Navigation messages are typical of a redirect occurring. Also the messages can show when workflow calls a close window action. You can monitor _javascript_ activity in Chrome or Firefox (via firebug for instance) on top of enabling workflow logging. That shou
Elaine,
Do you have problems with this folder filling up?
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Tang, Elaine
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:07 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: /attstore
**
Yes you are right. It's a tempor
Yes you are right. It's a temporary folder for downloading attachments from the
AR server.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 2:23 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: /attstore
**
Remedy/Mid
We are seeing something on our CM 7.5 application that we haven't seen
before. After creating an RFC, any attempt to save it displays a dialog
asking if we are sure we want to navigate away from this page. Essentially,
from that point no changes can be saved, and only closing the Change with
the
Hi Brad,
SRM uses CAI plugin to push data to back end application. CAI Events and CAI
Event Parameter forms would be good place to start.
Thanks
Vinay Vermani
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Bradley Murphy wrote:
> ** Hi All
>
> *Applications Running:*
> *
> *
>
>- Remedy Server 7.5 Patc
Potentially you could write an active link on say lose focus of a field to call
$PROCESS$ @@:Application-Generate-GUID and set the output to a field on the form
This way you will have the GUID created.
Now when you save / submit the request then an entry will be created in
database.
This way you
The presence of the field does not mean that the value is available before
the record is submitted to the db. You need to use the run process command
to populate a guid in the field prior to the record being submitted if you
need that value before the record is submitted.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1
ARS 6.3 on a Sun Solaris system and Oracle 10.x
Quick question.
It's been awhile since I've done this, I've build a GUID field (ID 179) on a
request form.. it's my understanding that this would make the GUID available
prior to submitting the ticket, however that doesnt seem to be the case. Am
I
All
I have a need to implement creating multiple tasks to an Incident for
assignment to various groups.
I see that there is a solution for this (Task Groups)with the Change
Management, but ony ad hoc tasks are available for Incident Managment by
befault.
It looks like the framework is the
Frank,
I don't know if you've heard of the Column Search product yet, but it allows
you to do case-insensitive searches against your Oracle database (plus a
whole lot more!!!).
If you (or others!) are interested in learning more about it, go ahead and
contact me and I can coordinate a demo
We have been told that FTS is the best solution. Setting Oracle to be case
insensitive causes performance issues.
Rick
On Dec 6, 2010 7:50 AM, "Frank Caruso" wrote:
> ARS 7.6.3
> ITSM 7.6.3
> Solaris 10 64bit
> Oracle 11g 64bit
>
> Looking to find out how others are handling case insensitive se
ARS 7.6.3
ITSM 7.6.3
Solaris 10 64bit
Oracle 11g 64bit
Looking to find out how others are handling case insensitive searches in
Oracle 11g? Or is FTS the way to go?
Thank you
Frank Caruso
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSli
Hi All
*Applications Running:*
*
*
- Remedy Server 7.5 Patch 003
- SRM 7.6
- ITSM 7.6
Does anyone know how SRM processes answers to questions when they are pushed
to a back end application such as Incident mgmt? We have come across a
problem where the answers to our questions in SRM ar
Ravi,
Ask the user to delete all the cookies and all the files from the browser
2) i think some java or .net api's are there plz try to install on the user
mechine
please see ant latest apis are there in the microsoft site,
i think this sloves u r problem
Thanks
Sanjeeva Naid
20 matches
Mail list logo