Re: 7.5 Adhoc approvals

2010-02-08 Thread Charles Baldi
> is still technically manually selected, we have to incorporate the adhoc > process. > > > > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Guillaume Rheault > *Sent:* Monday, February 08, 2010 2:17 PM > *To:* arslist

Re: 7.5 Adhoc approvals

2010-02-08 Thread Guillaume Rheault
T.ORG Subject: Re: 7.5 Adhoc approvals ** We actually don’t use that button, but a collector form does allow our customer to select from a predefined list of approvers. Because the approver is still technically manually selected, we have to incorporate the adhoc process. From: Action Request S

Re: 7.5 Adhoc approvals

2010-02-08 Thread Moellmer, Matthew
SList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Guillaume Rheault Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 2:17 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: 7.5 Adhoc approvals ** Hi Matt, I can personally attest to this issue. It seems to me this is a bug. At this point, you have two options: 1. You can either di

Re: 7.5 Adhoc approvals

2010-02-08 Thread Guillaume Rheault
: Monday, February 08, 2010 2:02 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: 7.5 Adhoc approvals ** Manually adding an approver to the Change Module in 7.5 results in approvals being bypassed erroneously. You can test this by manually adding an approver and moving through the process flow. Has anyone

7.5 Adhoc approvals

2010-02-08 Thread Moellmer, Matthew
Manually adding an approver to the Change Module in 7.5 results in approvals being bypassed erroneously. You can test this by manually adding an approver and moving through the process flow. Has anyone dealt with this or found a work around? We have automated "collector" forms which rely on adhoc