Here's what we figured out with the final problem we were having with
FTS.
The server I upgraded to ARS 7 also has SLA installed. Many fields on
various SLA forms are marked for full-text indexing; it's just that a
6.3 server ignores that attribute. Once the server was upgraded to ARS
7, all the f
the server and specify
> > this
> > > > thread when using the Admin tool.
> > > > This way you shouldn't tie up the admin thread.
>
> > > > Fred
>
> > > >
> > > > From: Action Request Syst
r and specify
this
> > thread when using the Admin tool.
> > This way you shouldn't tie up the admin thread.
>
> > Fred
>
> >
> > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
That was on solaris right ?
I cannot get it to work on MS - so I was just checking.. thanks.
On 6/19/07, George Barsan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We only replaced the files for patch 3.. Are you looking for something
special?
On 6/18/07, patrick zandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **
> George
We only replaced the files for patch 3.. Are you looking for something special?
On 6/18/07, patrick zandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
**
George -
From the ARS 7.01 P3 level - did you use the installer or file replacement ?
For my own side information ?
did you have any issues with your installati
George -
From the ARS 7.01 P3 level - did you use the installer or file replacement ?
For my own side information ?
did you have any issues with your installation?
On 6/18/07, George Barsan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Mike, all,
I've been troubleshooting FTS related bugs with BMC over the
Hi Mike, all,
I've been troubleshooting FTS related bugs with BMC over the last
weeks.. We're running on Solaris 10, Oracle and ARS 7.0.1 Patch 3 and
ran into very strange behaviour (indexing fails, takes extremely long
- i.e. more then 3 days on 250k records, failover within the server
group onl
>
> >
> > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of patrick zandi
> > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 3:58 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: ARS 7 and FTS
>
&g
riday, June 15, 2007 3:58 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7 and FTS
** I might be working some this weekend.. I will try a couple of things to
see if anything like what you are seeing.. happens..
On 6/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, 32 is
ystem discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of patrick zandi
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 3:58 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7 and FTS
** I might be working some this weekend.. I will try a couple of things
to see if anything like what you are seeing.. ha
I might be working some this weekend.. I will try a couple of things to see
if anything like what you are seeing.. happens..
On 6/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, 32 is pretty excessive, but I was trying to see if I could get
the behavior to change.
Just to be clear, u
Yeah, 32 is pretty excessive, but I was trying to see if I could get
the behavior to change.
Just to be clear, updating the FT index when a record changes take
virtually no time at all. It's the initial indexing when one first
marks a field to be full text indexed that's "locking up" the server.
Mike,
I have ARS 7.00 P2 and FTS.
FTS is working fine, and it very fast on the updates.. and accurate from
what I have tested.
I have not seen the lockup at all. I am not on 7.01P2 yet, however I tryed
P3 and could not login to the server..
I do not know if it was related to what you are saying y
Anyone out there using FTS on ARS 7? If so, I have some questions
about your experiences:
First off (this is one of my development servers):
ARS 7.0.1 patch 2, Windows 2003 SP1, SQL 2000 SP4, Java 1.5.0_11
So I recently purchased some FTS fixed user licenses and I've applied
them to one of my de
14 matches
Mail list logo
