Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?

2014-01-17 Thread Pierson, Shawn
-Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of RainingRemedy Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 1:07 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug? Jesus, This is not considered a bug. The AssetLifeCycle status

Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?

2014-01-17 Thread Ortega, Jesus A
. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of RainingRemedy Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 1:07 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug? Jesus, This is not considered a bug. The AssetLifeCycle

Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?

2014-01-17 Thread Jason Miller
1:07 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug? Jesus, This is not considered a bug. The AssetLifeCycle status field has been effectively moved from the CMDB forms and placed on the AST:Attributes form. The Status field you see is just the leftover core field

CMDB 8.1 Status bug?

2014-01-16 Thread Ortega, Jesus A
I have run into a potential bug in Atrium 8.1. BMC, in its infinite wisdom, decided to disperse a lot of fields that were once on BMC.CORE:BMC_BaseElement to BMC.CORE:BMC_ComputerSystem and a new form AST:Atributes. Additionally, they renamed BMC.CORE:BMC_ComputerSystem AssetLifecycleStatus to

Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?

2014-01-16 Thread Rick Cook
Did you also notice that the form structure changed in CMDB 8.x? Rather than a relatively flat structure, what you have now is nested joins (as deep as 6 levels) that mirror the structure of the CDM. So that, at least in part, explains the more relational data structure you're seeing. I can see

Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?

2014-01-16 Thread Roger Justice
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Thu, Jan 16, 2014 11:32 am Subject: CMDB 8.1 Status bug? ** I have run into a potential bug in Atrium 8.1. BMC, in its infinite wisdom, decided to disperse a lot of fields that were once on BMC.CORE:BMC_BaseElement to BMC.CORE:BMC_ComputerSystem and a new form

Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?

2014-01-16 Thread patrick zandi
Yeah :: another bug:: do not uninstall the application Web services: (BMC said too to fix an issue with integrator) -- now we are stuck. one application (the uninstaller) says the application is not installed, the installer application says it is already installed... so which is it.. BMC is

Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?

2014-01-16 Thread Ortega, Jesus A
...@lyondellbasell.commailto:jesus.ort...@lyondellbasell.com To: arslist arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Thu, Jan 16, 2014 11:32 am Subject: CMDB 8.1 Status bug? ** I have run into a potential bug in Atrium 8.1. BMC, in its infinite wisdom, decided to disperse a lot of fields that were once

Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?

2014-01-16 Thread Roger Justice
to create one. -Original Message- From: Ortega, Jesus A jesus.ort...@lyondellbasell.com To: arslist arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Thu, Jan 16, 2014 12:19 pm Subject: Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug? ** Here is the scenario: ยท I have a dataset that receives assets from a SAP system. When

Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?

2014-01-16 Thread Ortega, Jesus A
@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Roger Justice Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:26 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug? ** This is a process issue and not a reconciliation issue. The concept of not merging CIs into BMC.Asset until additional non discoverable data is available

Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?

2014-01-16 Thread RainingRemedy
Jesus, This is not considered a bug. The AssetLifeCycle status field has been effectively moved from the CMDB forms and placed on the AST:Attributes form. The Status field you see is just the leftover core field that is not being used. From what I've read, I don't think there is any plan to