Hi Folks,
I am just trying to get my head around the AR_SERVER_INFO changes introduced
in release 9.
ARS 9 does something not done previously with these values:
It changes the integer in some Info values and deletes some Info values
Image this scenario: You have a release 9 API acc
Ben,
Have you contacted BMC about this?they historically try to ensure
backwards/forwards compatibility...this obviously breaks things
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Ben Chernys <
ben.cher...@softwaretoolhouse.com> wrote:
> **
>
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> I am just trying to get my head around
.ORG] On Behalf Of Ben Chernys
Sent: 17 March 2016 02:17
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Confusion over AR_SERVER_INFO values as changed in the Rel 9 API -
even worse with 9.1.0
**
Well folks,
I'm afraid it just got a lot worse!!!
9.1.0 identifies itself as 9.0.0 but has a different s
ction Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Ben Chernys
> Sent: 17 March 2016 02:17
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: Confusion over AR_SERVER_INFO values as changed in the Rel 9 API
> - even worse with 9.1.0
>
> **
> W
.
Cheers
Ben
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
Sent: March-17-16 05:57
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Confusion over AR_SERVER_INFO values as changed in the Rel 9 API -
even worse with
server you should see some
>> clients with protocol version 23 so it looks like the C and Java APIs
>> may be at different levels in 9.1.
>>
>> I've tried to put together a list of release and protocol/db versions
>> here -
>> https://communities.bmc.com/docs/DOC
7 March 2016 11:57
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Confusion over AR_SERVER_INFO values as changed in the Rel 9 API -
even worse with 9.1.0
Hi Mark,
Do you really think that the server will map 379 to 380 depending on the client
API version? The API version in ar.h seems to be the same in
actual INFO values themselves and shudder to think
> what I may find.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Ben
>
>
>
> From: Ben Chernys [mailto:ben.cher...@softwaretoolhouse.com]
> Sent: March-01-16 10:24
> To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
> Subject: Confusion over AR_SERVER
-16 03:04
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Confusion over AR_SERVER_INFO values as changed in the Rel 9
API - even worse with 9.1.0
**
Ben,
I'm not 100% certain but my understanding is that the API version does not
indicate the server version but the version of the API specific
6 10:24
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: Confusion over AR_SERVER_INFO values as changed in the Rel 9 API
Hi Folks,
I am just trying to get my head around the AR_SERVER_INFO changes introduced
in release 9.
ARS 9 does something not done previously with these values:
It changes th
Ben
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: March-17-16 10:14
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Confusion over AR_SERVER_INFO values as changed in the Rel 9 API -
even worse with
; here -
> https://communities.bmc.com/docs/DOC-37267
>
> Mark
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Ben Chernys
> Sent: 17 March 2016 02:17
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: Confusion over AR_SERVER
12 matches
Mail list logo
