t; *Sent:* Monday, April 14, 2008 11:23 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: Difference between H and T table on SQL 2005
>
> ** One way would be to create a view of that form and give them access to
> just the view. That way, you don't have to mess with the perms on the m
Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 11:23 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Difference between H and T table on SQL 2005
** One way would be to create a view of that form and give them access to
just the
02 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: Difference between H and T table on SQL 2005
>
> **
> Thanks Rick for clearing that out. I didn't really paid attention to the
> data on the table and I was just looking at the number of rows. My mistake.
>
> *From:* Action R
AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Difference between H and T table on SQL 2005
**
Thanks Rick for clearing that out. I didn't really paid attention to the data
on the table and I was just looking at the number of rows. My mistake.
From: Action Request System discussion li
46 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Difference between H and T table on SQL 2005
** The H tables store Status History. As such, they've been around for a
VERY long time. Not all forms contain an H table, but all Regular forms do -
basically any form that contains the core fi
The H tables store Status History. As such, they've been around for a VERY
long time. Not all forms contain an H table, but all Regular forms do -
basically any form that contains the core field Status (Field ID 7).
Rick
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:37 AM, tricky maybe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm just curious what the difference is between the T table and the H table on
SQL 2005.
I don't think the H table existed before we upgraded from SQL 2000. They
sure look the same for me but I'm not a SQL guy so I'm not sure why there's an
H table now. They both look the same with the same
7 matches
Mail list logo
