Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-11 Thread Nancy Tietz
@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems Nancy, I do not have the error message form installed on my server. Do you have the luxury of installing it on your server? This form when installed and populated with the data by importing the related arx file that comes with its def file

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-11 Thread Joe Martin D'Souza
: public.remedy.arsystem.general To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems No I don't have this form. We are not on Unix, we are on Windows - and I don't even know which one. I come from an Oracle / Unix background, and here I'm now in MS SQL Server and Windows. Go figure! I

Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread smiley
this message in context: http://ars-action-request-system.1093659.n2.nabble.com/Direct-SQL-in-Active-Link-problems-tp7547138.html Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Axton
: http://ars-action-request-system.1093659.n2.nabble.com/Direct-SQL-in-Active-Link-problems-tp7547138.html Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Nancy Tietz
Hi Axton – Oh that’s right – somebody said to use ‘$SERVERTIMESTAMP$’… *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Axton *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:50 AM *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Joe Martin D'Souza
mentioned getting an error. What is that error? Joe From: Nancy Tietz Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 12:00 PM Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems ** Hi Axton – Oh that’s right – somebody said to use

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Grooms, Frederick W
Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 12:11 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems ** Yes $SERVERTIMESTAMP$ is a better candidate when you need

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Nancy Tietz
Okay - I'll try that. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:33 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems Mid-Tier may

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Nancy Tietz
The error message was:Error in parsing the Run Process or Direct SQL command (ARERR 9102) thanks -Original Message- From: Nancy Tietz [mailto:nti...@umich.edu] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:45 PM To: arslist@arslist.org Subject: RE: Direct SQL in Active Link problems Okay - I'll try

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Jason Miller
in context: http://ars-action-request-system.1093659.n2.nabble.com/Direct-SQL-in-Active-Link-problems-tp7547138.html Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Nancy Tietz
Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Jason Miller *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:59 PM *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems ** Hi Nancy, It has been fun to help you to work out these issues. I have a question

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Nancy Tietz
...@umich.edu] *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:42 PM *To:* arslist@arslist.org *Subject:* RE: Direct SQL in Active Link problems Hi Jason – thanks for your help – I did try the other form method first as it seemed to be the better option, however I never got it to work. What happened

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Nancy Tietz
10, 2012 5:21 PM *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems ** Do it in an action just before the direct SQL action i.e. In your Active Link Action 1: Set Fields $zMyDisplayOnlyInteger$ = $SERVERTIMESTAMP$ Action 2: Direct SQL update

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Joe Martin D'Souza
: public.remedy.arsystem.general To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems The error message was:Error in parsing the Run Process or Direct SQL command (ARERR 9102) thanks -Original Message- From: Nancy Tietz [mailto:nti...@umich.edu] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:45 PM

Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems

2012-05-10 Thread Joe Martin D'Souza
: public.remedy.arsystem.general To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Direct SQL in Active Link problems ** Hi again – Is there something I have to do to get the Integer value INTO the Date field??? Here is the ONLY way I could put the DATEDIFF into the Integer field… just before doing the UPDATe in the Direct SQL