-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Romain
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 1:16 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: EIE vs. arimportcmd flat file import performance
I did some initial testing of EIE into CMDB 2 and found
usually takes time?
Joe D'Souza
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Romain
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 3:37 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: EIE vs. arimportcmd flat file import performance
Joe
We are strategizing a way to import a large number of records on a
routine basis. I'll just skip all the details since they really are not
relevant to the core question:
Has anyone compared import speed between the EIE and using the old
school arimportcmd command line process in order to import
: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Romain
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 1:16 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: EIE vs. arimportcmd flat file import performance
I did some initial testing of EIE into CMDB 2 and found it much slower
(about
4 matches
Mail list logo
