close attention and be illuminated by its brilliance. - paraphrased by me
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Robin
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 3:07 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: EXTERNAL: Help on arch
are Development Analyst
> Lockheed Martin - MS2
> The star that burns twice as bright burns half as long.
> Pay close attention and be illuminated by its brilliance. - paraphrased by
> me
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
&g
quest System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 7:01 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Help on archiving data.
Hi,
RRR|Chive has the ability to MOVE things, which is good when you do
archiving. If the form
List)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 7:01 AM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Help on archiving data.
>
> Hi,
>
> RRR|Chive has the ability to MOVE things, which is good when you do
> archivin
list@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Help on archiving data.
Hi Rick,
Can you elaborate on the "caveat"? There should be no 10K limit to the number
of records RRR|Chive can move in a single run.
And why not run it every night. This would minimize impact even further, as
fewer reco
Thanks for the reply.
I have two options infront of me.
1) Use DB Script
2) Use RRRchive
Can you please let me know the advantages of RRRchive over DB script for
archiving?
Regards
Robin
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access AR
RRR|Chive will use ARS API. That means that the workflow will be fired and
it can be slow (because of your ARS server, not because RRR|Chive. Also
both source and destiny must be ARS servers (can be the same).
DB is faster but you are doing things outside ARS. That means that it's not
supported, t
Hi,
There is an option to disable workflow on the target form:
target_disablemergefltr = YES
There is also an option for the delete in the source form:
source_disabledeletefltr = YES
The problem with the delete-filter is that RRR|Chive needs to disable the
filter completely, and that is an admin
Agree
Jose Manuel Huerta
http://theremedyforit.com/
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Misi Mladoniczky wrote:
>
>
> You can then, as I mentioned earlier, use RRR|ArxToHTML to create HTML web
> pages of the ARX-files, which can be accessed with any browser. Either on
> a web server or on a file
Thanks Misi and Jose for your reply.
Misi,
Changing the Filter qualification on the source form is a good idea.
If I propose RRRchive as a solution for archiving,the first concern comes in
everyone's mind will be the performance impact on the application server as it
uses API.
Can you please
Hi,
If you run the archiving scripts often, the impact will be less.
In any event, the impact should be light, as RRR|Chive normally does not
trigger any table scans.
If a lot of records are archived ("deleted") at the same time, this might
have a small impact.
Records are merged and deleted on
11 matches
Mail list logo
